He listed the following as Regents» achievements: winning $ 700 million through the federal
Race To The Top competitive grant program, raising standards, achieving a significant new investment in pre-kindergarten and increasing graduation rates.
Schools used their share of $ 4.3 billion in federal
Race to the Top competitive - grant money to make significant progress in areas including state data systems and instructional resources for teachers.
Critics note, however, that the federal government has encouraged states to adopt the Common Core through
the Race to the Top competitive grant program and a streamlined path to waivers from the provisions of No Child Left Behind.
In particular, the Obama administration, through
its Race to the Top competitive grants and its waivers of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requirements, is putting pressure on states to incorporate student test scores as a significant component of any new teacher evaluation system.
The Education Department also on Thursday released a report on the Obama administration's $ 4 billion
Race to the Top competitive grant program, describing how it ushered in sweeping policy changes in many states, including some that proved controversial, such as new teacher evaluations tied to student test scores.
However, he opposes current legislation aimed at improving the state's eligibility for up to $ 700 million in the federal
Race to the Top competitive grants.
In the Obama administration's 2009
Race to the Top competitive grant program, for example, the federal government favored states that permitted the use of student test scores in teacher evaluations.
As a staffer in the administration of former Tennessee governor Phil Bredesen, Pinkston was instrumental in devising the state's successful proposal to receive money from the Obama administration's
Race to the Top competitive grant program.
Not exact matches
The one fact of the mighty empiricist in this article is that we were in 4 cup finals in the last 5 years and won 3 the rest of the piece is opinion about the unfair treatment of his supplier... another fact is that we were incapable of getting past the last 16 in the CL in that time and another fact is that we were never at any point serious contenders
to win the EPL and another fact is that at the end of that cup run we dropped out of the
top 4 and will now drop out of the
top 5... Another fact is that for over a decade we haven't been
competitive in the two
races that define a
top flight european club even though the promise was that by building a shiny new stadium and charging the highest gate prices in world football we would... And a million and one other facts that point
to one thing WENGER OUT
If all the players mentioned above do move
to the
top four or five clubs in the Premier League, then there will be no question that the
race for the title in the English
top flight will be the most
competitive in the world.
This will hopefully lead
to a more
competitive title
race, meaning more teams involved as the points tally between the
top two or three is always close.
Rep. Timothy H. Bishop's re-election has once again surged
to the
top of the cycle's list of most
competitive House
races, and Republicans are more optimistic than ever they can defeat the battle - tested New York Democrat.
Missouri is playing host
to one of the year's most
competitive Senate
races, and Attorney General Josh Hawley is supposed
to be among the
top Republican recruits.
At this still - early point in the»08 cycle, it's hard
to overlook the dearth of
top - tier Republican candidates in potentially
competitive Senate
races.
«By passing legislation
to raise the charter cap, reform charter schools, improve teacher evaluation, and invest in tracking educational outcomes, the Senate Democratic Majority helped give New York the
competitive advantage it needed
to become a finalist in the
Race to the
Top,» Sampson crowed.
David Davis [Minister for Leaving the EU] said the UK wanted
to lead a «global
race to the
top» in rights and standards not, as some feared, a «
competitive race to the bottom».
In 2009, through the «
Race to the
Top» program, the federal government offered $ 4.35 billion in
competitive grants
to states that adopted Common Core standards and developed plans
to improve state test scores and teacher evaluation results.
Ball has also co-sponsored a bill
to ditch the Common Core altogether, along with the federal competitive grant program Race To The Top, which is President Obama's signature education initiativ
to ditch the Common Core altogether, along with the federal
competitive grant program
Race To The Top, which is President Obama's signature education initiativ
To The
Top, which is President Obama's signature education initiative.
Alcivar noted the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has declined
to elevate Derrick
to their
top - tier support program designed
to aid candidates in the country's most
competitive races.
So yes, there are inevitably going
to be
competitive races that don't make one person or another's
top 10 list of the MOST
competitive ones.
The Common Core standards were developed by a group of state education leaders but promoted by the federal government, particularly through
Race To The
Top, a nationwide
competitive grant program that required the adoption of standards that boost college - and career - readiness.
Here's POLITICO's guide
to the massive battlefield of congressional
races - including every district the
top analysts call
competitive - with the latest polls, fundraising numbers and up -
to - date handicapping.
Each month seems
to find the
top three in most categories getting closer
to each other and making this
race super
competitive.
He also, unexpectedly, made the case for the continuation of the
Race to the
Top approach of federal incentives for state - level reforms (presumably via
competitive grant programs).
The idea of New York being
competitive in a national
race to the
top in education reform was a no - brainer
to people around the state.
Obama programs such as «
Race to the
Top,» a $ 4 billion
competitive grant program that rewards states that develop reforms, has some support from states but is «not easy
to explain,» said Jal Mehta, an assistant professor of education.
It seems almost peevish
to criticize U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan's game - changing
Race to the
Top plan that dangles $ 4 billion in new
competitive - grant funding before states willing
to reform their schools.
Duncan announced
Race to the
Top (RttT), a
competitive grants program that had been authorized and funded by the education stimulus package.
At the same time, the
Race to the
Top program offered
competitive grants that awarded points
to states based on their implementation of policies like performance - based evaluations.
The
Race to the
Top program, announced in 2009, allotted $ 4.35 billion for
competitive state grants and encouraged states and districts
to revamp their teacher evaluations.
If, for example, it releases funds as formula grants, which are distributed
to all states on the same basis, it can ensure universal adoption of programs like Title I.
Competitive grants like
Race to the
Top arguably make policy implementation more efficient: the executive branch can regulate, clarify, and be selective about its enforcement of the law.
After a protracted debate, delegates
to the National Education Association have voted
to take a position of «no confidence» in the U.S. Department of Education's
Race to the
Top guidelines and in the use of
competitive grants as a basis for the reauthorization of ESEA.
If the extension makes it into the final spending bills for fiscal year 2011, advocates say, that could mean more states will take the reform - minded steps emphasized in the
Race to the
Top program, such as revamping their teacher - evaluation systems and lifting caps on charter schools, in order
to get a slice of the
competitive grants.
With the Department of Education proposing a new $ 5 billion
Race to the
Top — style
competitive grant program aimed at teacher policy, however, it's worth taking a closer look at
Race to the
Top's results.
President Barack Obama is forcefully defending his signature education initiative, the $ 4.35 billion
Race to the
Top program, which has come under fire from civil rights groups that worry the
competitive nature of the program creates a system of winners and losers that could hinder schools serving poor and minority students.
Third, the Education Department could mount a
competitive - grant program akin
to Race to the
Top for states and / or districts that want
to engage in more school choice.
Earlier in 2009, also through
Race to the
Top, the administration had offered $ 4.35 billion in funding through a
competitive grant program designed
to encourage states
to enact the feds» preferred school - reform policies — including the adoption of better standards and assessments.
The use of adaptive learning is closely tied
to the
Race to the
Top early learning reform initiative, alignment with Common Core State Standards, and
to teach 21st century skills
to increase U.S. student
competitive advantage.
The expanded federal role has been most evident in a thoroughly revamped National Assessment of Educational Progress (1988); the Clinton administration's Goals 2000 Act (1994); the Bush administration's No Child Left Behind Act (2001); and, most recently, the «
Race to the
Top» component of the 2009 economic stimulus act, which will award
competitive grants
to states that, in the judgment of the Obama administration, have what it takes
to turn around failing schools and boost student achievement.
His program was a federal grant, called «
Race to the
Top,» which was doled out on a
competitive basis.
In the study,
to be published in the Spring 2011 issue of Education Next and available at www.educationnext.org, authors Stuart Buck and Jay P. Greene examined the key characteristics of performance pay plans currently in place in school districts, in light of increased attention given
to merit pay in national debate and in the Obama Administration's
Race to the
Top (RttT)
competitive grant program.
Everything else will be left on the cutting room floor — specific requirements about interventions in failing schools; mandates around teacher evaluations or «highly qualified teachers»;
competitive grant programs a la
Race to the
Top.
And the present decade opened with the
Race to the
Top, the brainchild of U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, based on the bold hypothesis that sizable grants of federal dollars, disbursed via a
competitive process, can induce states
to jump through reform policy hoops that they likely would not otherwise have attempted.
Meanwhile, the findings conclude that the U.S. Department of Education rewarded two states that have historically implemented among the lowest standards in the country — Tennessee and Delaware — with highly
competitive Race to the
Top (RttT) funds.
«We promise there will be plenty of money left in phase two,» Joanne Weiss, the department's
Race to the
Top director, told states gathered in the Baltimore area for a department - sponsored technical seminar on the
competitive - grant program.
But not
to worry: Washington Education Association sounds happy that
Race to the
Top and its «underlying
competitive nature» is going away.
He also pressed for innovation by implementing
competitive grant programs, such as
Race to the
Top and Inventing in Innovation (i.e., «i3»).
As with the No Child reauthorization plan put together by Alexander, Kline's proposal would restrict the Obama Administration and its successors from requiring states
to implement high - quality curricula standards or specific accountability systems as condition of receiving Title 1 dollars or funds from
competitive grant programs such as
Race to the
Top.
But Duncan can also leverage his
competitive grant programs — including
Race to the
Top — for this purpose by requiring additional data collection
to be a condition of gaining those funds.
There would be an additional $ 1.35 billion for
Race to the
Top, $ 500 million for a similar contest called Investing in Innovation and hundreds of millions of dollars for
competitive grants
to improve teaching and school leadership.