Not exact matches
@Dave The proof is all around us, do you look up into the sky and be greatful for the great gas ball is
in the sky and your whole
life is based on
random chance.
The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine
in a
random way which by
chance resulted
in a
living cell.
You laugh at the Supernatural, even though scientists have calculated the odds of
life forming by natural processes to be estimated less than 1
chance in 10 to the 40, ooo power — But you find nothing wrong with believing that billions of years full of
random mutations would result
in the impossible.
I believe that no one does the math — the logic of math is
in favour of creation over evolution — «
random chance» aka evolution is mathematically to astounding to believe — Alfred Hoyles number don't lie... and dna is a code —
random chance can not create a code sequence nor can
random chance ever improve itself... just think about it — mathmatically speaking there is a god or creator or creators of the code for
life.
It was just by «
random chance» that the sun is the perfect distance from the earth so we don't get baked or frozen, that the moon is the right distance and size so the tides don't flood us, that the earth rotates so we are evenly heated, that water - which is absent on other planets and vital to our
life - is present here, that there is a balance of
living things to keep each other
in check.
If, on the other hand, we define evolution
in the Darwinian sense — as a process of
random mutation and natural selection by which all
living beings have arisen by
chance from single - celled organisms over 100's of millions of years — we may not be on equally firm ground from a scientific perspective.
in the atheistic view, the universe was created by
chance, from nothing,
life originated from
random collections of molecules, etc..
What the argument by probability does is to reflect on the «fine - tunedness» of a universe
in which
life can exist, reflects on the
chance of
life occurring through purely
random events, and concludes that the
chance of
life coming into existence through purely
random forces of nature is so infinitesimally small as to be almost non-existent.
Ask a
random person on the street to name his or her five favorite scientists,
chances are you would hear a litany of familiar names — perhaps Marie Curie, Albert Einstein or Louis Pasteur — all of them instrumental
in casting the world
in which we
live.
Science's assumption of a dumb
random universe —
in which
life arose by
chance — has the secondary effect of isolating us from nature.
Most of those reasons are related to human error and negligence, some are related to the bad side of humanity
in general, and some are related to the fact that your
life is impacted by
random chance on a daily basis.
There is no certainty
in life or
in the markets, just
chance events and
random probabilities.
Every fur - creature
in my
life came to me through
random chance and or because I went to a place and selected ones with whom I / my family felt a special connection.