Not exact matches
part of the utility is that Charney sensitivity, using only relatively
rapid feedbacks, describes the climate
response to an externally imposed forcing change on a particular timescale related
to the heat capacity of the system (if the
feedbacks were sufficiniently
rapid and the heat capacity independent of time scale (it's not largely because of oceanic circulation), an imbalance would exponentially decay on the time scale of heat capacity * Charney equilibrium climate sensitivity.
A climate model that has positive
feedback can be «tuned» by adjusting the inputs and internal model variables produce
to make the model produce a
rapid, very large, abrupt temperature
response,
to a small forcing change.
To say this another way, even if worst case warming scenarios with regards to feedbacks do emerge, all it does, from the human standpoint, is make rapid responses to climate change all the more urgent and necessar
To say this another way, even if worst case warming scenarios with regards
to feedbacks do emerge, all it does, from the human standpoint, is make rapid responses to climate change all the more urgent and necessar
to feedbacks do emerge, all it does, from the human standpoint, is make
rapid responses to climate change all the more urgent and necessar
to climate change all the more urgent and necessary.
So now there only remains for you
to factor in the time lagged
responses of isostatic adjustments, albedo
feedback, ice melt and ocean heat accumulation
to rapid forcing changes.
The growth and decay of continental ice sheets represents a slow
feedback operating over millennia; if one is concerned with the more
rapid response of the climate
to CO2, ice sheets have
to be accounted for as a major forcing.
This study therefore suggests the
rapid response to CO2 forcing is (apart from a possible small negative
response from LW water vapour) essentially confined
to cloud fraction changes affecting SW radiation, and further that significant
feedbacks with temperature occur in all cloud components (including this one), and indeed in all other classically understood «
feedbacks».
Motivated by findings that major components of so - called cloud «
feedbacks» are best understood as
rapid responses to CO2 forcing (Gregory and Webb in J Clim 21:58 — 71, 2008), the top of atmosphere (TOA) radiative effects from forcing, and the subsequent
responses to global surface temperature changes from all «atmospheric
feedbacks» (water vapour, lapse rate, surface albedo, «surface temperature» and cloud) are examined in detail in a General Circulation Model.