Not exact matches
In other words, putting family first doesn't imply nepotism, but
rather ordinary
human responsibility.
According to Bercier, «the highest act of man is not his exercise of reason in discerning the forms of nature» but
rather his «
responsibility for his own being and identity as it is authoritatively addressed to him by the Logos»; in other words, man's special dispensation of reason is for the sake of directing
human nature towards «its most perfect end in man's own right self - governance» versus a liberation from the yoke of that nature.
So according to him, Sakhkhara does not mean the conquest or exploitation of nature
rather it should be a kind of relationship in accordance with God's laws and
responsibility of the
human beings as vicegerents of God.
Man's total dependence on and submission to an authoritarian God is also in tension with
human responsibility and maturity; supernaturalism has too often resulted in the repression
rather than the fulfillment of man's natural vitalities.
But there have also been theologies that have emphasized
human freedom and
responsibility and thought of God's relation to creature, or at least to
human creatures, as persuasive
rather than coercive.
So I'd
rather define what it is to be
human — kind; loving; compassionate; empathetic; self - aware; honest; respects him / herself and others; generous of spirit; realizes he / she is part of a much bigger picture; takes
responsibility for his / her actions, and has a moral compass.
Since taking over from the
rather more liberal, Kenneth Clarke Grayling has attacked
human rights as «political correctness», proposed dramatic restrictions to the right of individuals to challenge the state through judicial review, imposed significant restrictions on access to lawyers with no - win no - fee cases, moved the government back on to the course of building more (and bigger) prisons — despite the evidence against them — and is set on dramatically privatising up to 70 % of the probation service ceding state
responsibility for offenders to commercial enterprises.
Because
rather than compartmentalize Gen's issues into movie - friendly tics that separate «normal» from «crazy,» Curtis» potency — apart from his soulfully pinched mug — is in offering up a portrayal of concerted betterment built with the things that make us all
human: a swirl of worry, joy, persistence, intelligence, confusion, sadness and
responsibility.
As a good dog chaperone — I choose this term over «owner» as a reminder that the relationship between
humans and dogs is one in which both living beings must be enriched — we have a
responsibility to our companion animals to teach them that being alone is not something to fear;
rather, it should be embraced as an opportunity to relax and regain strength.
Rather than representing yet another sign of
human hubris, this name change would stress the enormity of humanity's
responsibility as stewards of the Earth.
Bird lovers would do well to take
responsibility for the
HUMAN contribution to the problem, and invest generously in conservation,
rather than blame cats, who are, in general, NOT the creatures who are cutting down forests and destroying wetlands.
Rather, the Bill proposes to devolve power and
responsibility for Indigenous heritage to States and Territories without ensuring that State and Territory - based protective regimes will meet
human rights standards.
So I'd
rather define what it is to be
human — kind; loving; compassionate; empathetic; self - aware; honest; respects him / herself and others; generous of spirit; realizes he / she is part of a much bigger picture; takes
responsibility for his / her actions, and has a moral compass.