Sentences with phrase «rational people make»

Rational people make rational decisions.

No rational person makes decisions based on such distorted logic in any other area of life, and decisions regarding the textual veracity of the Biblical text should not be an exception to that rule.

Atheism is simply the sounds that any rational person makes in the presence of religious nonsense.

Not exact matches

But when you claim that you've «beaten» your main competitor, Lyft, and say that an additional service will be more expensive and you hear that people don't trust you anymore because things keep changing and they can't make rational plans, getting angry and blaming them isn't the solution.

A wise person will never invest in a company the day it's founded, for the simple fact that there's no information available to make a rational decision.

Behavioral finance is a fairly new term and area of research that surfaced when researchers realized that investors, people who make otherwise rational decisions throughout much of their life, do not make rational decisions when it comes to money.

The smarts - dominated leader is rational, makes decisions based on facts, sets goals, delegates responsibility and knows how to hold people accountable.

Every major sell - off in history has been accompanied by a mix of economic concerns, monetary policy shifts, geopolitical tensions, or some other source of consternation that might make a rational person demand a higher premium for putting their capital at risk.

People who work with a financial advisor feel more confident, they save more, they take action (and don't procrastinate retirement planning) and they make rational moves with their money.

People don't always make rational decisions when it comes to money.

Unlike some of the comments left on this subject, I would hope that intelligent, rational people would listen and make their own decision as to what they believe, that is the freedom we have.

All of that, and there is no verifiable proof that any of it is or was ever true can lead a rational person to only one conclusion: a man - made fairy tale at best and a means of mind - control, torture and prejudice at worst.

Or perhaps I simply realize that many of the so called rational atheists who post on CNN are dedicated to reason only as long as it supports their positions and when it doesn't immediately switch to ad hominem attacks to try to get people to ignore the legitimate point that was made.

The obvious contradictions and the lack of any verifiable evidence make that leap virtually impossible for any rational person.

But just because these domestic terrorists try to instill fear of rational people into their idiot audiences, doesn't make them right.

are people so simple they crave the misguided beliefs of others to feel better about themselves or are we triing to understand the lunacy of our citizens to believe something as pathic as a 3000 year old IDEA in order to act properly when voting in those who will run this country for the next 4 years a.k.a. voting in one who using rational thinking and logic to make choices!

People probably should make rational decisions

They want a rational chronology of events that make rational sense and there is an obvious pattern of one person being the wrong doer.

Its called fuzzy logic, the idea that since people are rational but almost always don't have all the necessary information to make a perfectly logical conclusion, the resulting truths are always assailable.

You can call me a coward and say I «ran away» or whatever your malicious, childish mind wants to make up to make yourself feel better, but I prefer to actually have adult conversations with rational people who can articulate their opinions based in reasonable, rational thought.

You can not convince a person that rational thought is the highest authority without making a rational argument.

You can call me a coward and say I «ran away» or whatever your malicious, childish mind wants to make up to make yourself feel better, but I prefer to actually have adult conversations with rational people who can articulate their opinions based in reasonable, rational thought ========= Apparently, since you are still addressing me, I must be «adult» in my conversation and displaying rational thought.

Typical of these right - wingers; they make these outlandish, incendiary statements, designed to rev up their base, then quietly apologize when they are called out by rational people.

Your comments show a level of bigotry and ignorance that would make a reasonable, rational person embarrassed.

He is thus against natural law theory but for a DCT in which God, by creating rational creatures, is bound to make their highest end a relationship with the divine persons, but free to pursue that end via any number of routes.

Religious people can not be trusted to make rational decisions where their religion is concerned.

Christian theology must make its case, I have argued, by presenting a worldview that is intrinsically convincing to people because of its rational coherence and its adequacy to the facts of experience.

I believe we are our brothers and sisters keepers and one could make the argument that it falls under the category of rational self interest; however, the minute people think they can enforce that philosophy at the end of a barrel of a gun (gov «t) the whole thing falls apart and religion becomes secular humanism where the state replaces God.

You say the issue isn't if there's a God or not, yet people (yourself included) keep making the extraordinary claim of an incorporeal sentient being without the slightest bit of evidence or rational argument.

It does make Christians look bad and I have never seen a group of people who were more rational and down to earth.

In addition to these crazy and immoral laws, there are plenty of examples of God's irrationality by his direct killing of many people for reasons that defy any rational explanation such as killing children who make fun of bald people, and the killing of a man who tried to keep the ark of God from falling during transport.

But the fact that Santa is based on a real person makes belief in him more rational than a belief in gods.

This is done in an attempt to make people who have rational arguments against church doctrine and church history seem irrational and therefore making their arguments invalid.

But as a person is an individual ofrational nature, what makes us rational?

One may make that argument in an eminently rational way, although in a way that will not be convincing to many people.

We can, from a Rawlsian view, presume that consent from all future generations; persons will always be for changes to nature that make them more free, responsible, and rational.

In deciding what enhancements to make generally available, it make sense to say, Mehlman goes on, that «The government decision - maker might look to John Rawls» notion of «primary goods» — those that every rational person should want.»

I don't even make fun of the more rational people that believe in one religion or another.

If you take the time to sit and think about each and every story in the Bible, you will realize that none of it makes any rational sense to rational people.

Not sure about the majority, but if more people made rational decisions then we would have a better shot at making this country better for more people, yes.

Conservative View: Government Guarantees Your Freedom Natural Law = Moral Truth Moral Truth = Legal System People are Rational and Can Make Their Own Choices within Context of Legal System

I was just thinking about her today, by chance, and her amazing reversion, because my mother read her Jesus books... And I was thinking, damn, it's such crap the way she talked about how she stopped being an atheist because of the historicity of Jesus, no rational person can make that argument, she walking on glass, then BOOM!

Then the lucid addition of «So Satan may not tempt you with your lack of self control» I mean one can easily make the rational assumption or argument that masturbation is a good remedy in this regard as well to help relieve the desires of the flesh that might other wise lead a married person to adultery.

@Sigh: attempting to make rational arguments gets tedious when it amounts to beating your head against a brick wall — it tends to make people irritated and impolite.

typically, when people make outlandish claims, others of undoubtedly more rational thinking, prefer to see said claims substantiated with some evidence.

Your problem is obviously that you go into your rationale with the intent to make people feel like their beliefs are childish and they are inferior to you and your so - obvious rational adult mentality.

It's great for winning others to the side of reason, of course — but I assume you want to slow the flight of rational people from Christianity rather than making them flee so as not to be associated with the nutters.

It's also irrational to think that the number of people involved makes their belief the slightest bit more logical or rational.

First, many people still believe that science has advanced by fighting religious superstition and making the world safe for rational inquiry.

No rational thinking person can believe in fairy tales and make that his whole life.