Sentences with phrase «rawlsian justice theory»

Product Quality and Pay Equity between Lower - Level Employees and Top Management: An Investigation of Distributive Justice Theory.

For example, in one of the better chapters, entitled «Human Justice and Animal Fairness», the reader is introduced to Maasai systems of gift - giving, game theory as applied to chimpanzee behaviour, canine sensitivity to fairness, rules of play among wolves and rats, before a brief detour into Martha Nussbaum's development of Rawlsian justice theory leads us to an extended discussion of Aquinas» understanding of justice as a virtue, acquired and infused.

Their unwillingness to argue over which social justice theories are correct ends up confirming the professors» monolithic conception.

The Restorative Justice theory emphasizes the value of accountability.

Together, PUC and LMU designed a program that is centered on social justice theory and includes a focus on how teachers can create more equitable schools and classrooms, according to Leslie Chang, PUC Schools superintendent for instruction and leadership.

Roman Catholic social - justice theory, derived from such sources as the papal encyclical Rerum Novarum and the work of the French neo-Thomistic philosopher Jacques Maritain, had a strong influence on these alumni.

Zero Carbon, Zero Poverty — The Climate Justice Way, a major new report written for the Mary Robinson Foundation: Climate Justice by Sivan Kartha and Paul Baer of the Climate Equity Reference Project, breaks new ground in global climate justice theory and analysis.

One might ask who are the high emitting regional and local governments, organizations, businesses, and individuals that are exceeding their fair share of safe global emissions given differences in distributive justice theories.

«Reparations under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Reparative Justice Theory», 3 International Journal of Transitional Justice 250 (2009).

Of course, if you're from the «law and... blank» stream, you may be of the view that corrective justice theories are bunk, and working from that stream could get you to your view that the difference is one of degree.

In addition, two legal academics were recognized for their contributions to legal and social justice theory.

That eventually led him to studying law where he saw the opportunity for the practical application of justice theory.

Legitimacy, Trust and Compliance: An Empirical Test of Procedural Justice Theory using the European Social Survey Hough, M., Jackson, J., and Bradford, B. (2013 forthcoming) in Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration, Yale University Press These related works present and discuss findings of an empirical test of procedural justice theory using the European Social Survey.

Attention is given to the background and political context of procedural justice theory.

In this first article in a planned quartet, Professor Markel proposes using public retributive justice theory to frame a new system of punitive damages.

Not exact matches

One theory is that schools» justice systems are not subject to the same standards of evidence and burden of proof as the criminal - justice system.

It called the showdown «reckless» and accused the Justice Department of rushing to «legal war with dubious theories.»

There are three important points to make about the complaint that the Justice Department has filed under Section 7 of the Clayton Act to block the AT&T / Time Warner merger: (1) The main theory of the case is relatively straightforward and plausible.

Justice Kennedy's majority opinion said that there was no principled way to distinguish between media corporations and other corporations and that the dissent's theory would allow Congress to suppress political speech in newspapers, on television news programs, in books and on blogs.

(For the conservative critics, that would be one more count against Rawls's general theory of justice and political morality.)

Giambrone's claims that «Justice Scalia's legal theory has no ultimate framework for holding the government accountable before God» and that he sees natural law as merely a «rhetorical cover for the preferred moral agenda of any given judge.»

Proceeding in this way enables us to connect the private good of individuals with the common good of the community, unlike liberal theories of justice that consider only «rights.»

Yet today, that same thesis is liable to provoke a firestorm as intense as when Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas started paying compliments to such extremist and radical notions as Aristotelian natural law theory.

If just - war theory is in poor repute today it is because it has been pressed into service to justify war rather than to prevent or restrain it; rather than being used to advance the cause of peace or justice, the theory has often provided a quickly accessible patina of moral justifiability to disguise aggression and expansionist policy.

(Roe's theory of «substantive due process,» which was also the basis for Dred Scoff and Lochner, has always landed the court in trouble, because it strikes down properly enacted laws that interfere with whatever the justices conclude is an important «liberty»)

None of them has appealed to or provided a well - developed theory of justice.

It appears that to be truly just, we would have to apply this theory of justice categorically» both to the death penalty and to war.

We do not need a comprehensive theory or even a successful definition of justice before demanding this correction.

The economic theory based on Homo economicus has no place in for any notion of fairness or justice.

In our recent history, the most influential quasi-Kantian effort to establish a moral basis for democracy is John Rawls» A Theory of Justice.

nothing makes the atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the world... If there wasnt a god in the first place, humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would be a non-issue to us... survival of the fittest would not permit the emotions of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any of those and many other of the best of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away by synapse or neurons... without a Supreme Being, there would be no sense of justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there is no Ultimate Moral Standard to compare it.

One critical action today might just be thinking — clarifying the basic theory on which to preach, teach and act for justice.

Accordingly, economic theory has no place for community or for such values of community as justice.

Here we can borrow a bit from John Rawls's A Theory of Justice and assume that justice may be done even if the dam's location causes some individuals the inconvenience of having to move their resJustice and assume that justice may be done even if the dam's location causes some individuals the inconvenience of having to move their resjustice may be done even if the dam's location causes some individuals the inconvenience of having to move their residence.

In other words, a valid theory of justice requires an internal distinction between the formative principle or set of principles that should be explicitly articulated in a democratic constitution and the substantive principle or set of principles that ought to determine decisions taken in or through the full and free political discourse.

Furthermore, there seems to be specifically Christian wisdom at work in talk about the «ethics of long - range responsibility,» or in John Rawls's insistence that the notion of justice be expanded to include justice to future generations (A Theory of Justice [Harvard University Press, 1971justice be expanded to include justice to future generations (A Theory of Justice [Harvard University Press, 1971justice to future generations (A Theory of Justice [Harvard University Press, 1971Justice [Harvard University Press, 1971]-RRB-.

Laudato Si, last week's encyclical from Pope Francis, seeks to address a plethora of problems in the modern world — predominately focusing on environmental issues, distributive justice, and perceived problems with consensus developmental economic theory.

Hence, it is not uncommon in Christian political theory — particularly contemporary Christian political theory — to reject the concept of a universally known justice via creation ordinances and turn, instead, to the notion of «redemption ordinances.»

The truth is that, as, for instance, in Rawls» A Theory of Justice, contract thinking engages ideas of promise and obligation that take on at least the appearance of being covenantal.

Historically, the theory was, as articulated by Zacharias Ursinus, that «the Church... looks to the reformation and salvation of the offender; the magistrate to the execution of justice and the public peace.»

His three conditions necessary for a just resort to force — sovereign authority, just cause, and right intention — correspond directly to the three goods of the political community as defined in Augustinian political theory: order, justice, and peace.

But where do you find it proper within your legal theory of Justice, to charge smokers extra to provide health care for kids that aren't even theirs?

Third, the context has shifted: in contrast to the traditional Catholic conception of the political community, and politics within such communities, as the means of achieving real if limited justice for human life in the world, and a corresponding theory of international relations, recent Catholic thought on war often treats the state as a locus of injustice and the goals of particular states as inherently at odds with the achievement of common human goals, while an internationalism defined in terms of the United Nations system is proposed as the best means to those common goals.

Some ethical theories stress the need for order in relations among states, while others stress the requirements of justice.

The theory of the identity of religion with the sum total of man's cultural and social life does not do justice to its peculiar nature.

It is an ideology seizing threads of environmental, social, racial, and economic justice, and interweaving them with strands of multiculturalism, gender discourse, gay rights, queer theory, post-colonialism, and anti-capitalism.

While love and justice are separable concepts in theory, in fact they are made inseparable for the Christian by their mutuality and indissolubility in God's self - revelation.

It is unselfconsciously evident in the text of A Theory of Justice.

, Sojourners 6 (October 1977): 11 - 14; Stephen Charles Mott, «Egalitarian Aspects of the Biblical Theory of Justice,» Selected Papers of the American Society of Christian Ethics: 1978.

As far as I can tell, she means opinions that contradict fundamentally what the late Harvard professor John Rawls described in A Theory of Justice.