Sentences with phrase «reading majority opinion»

«Federal Appellate Judge Dissents Without Reading Majority Opinion ``: At «The Volokh Conspiracy,» Eugene Volokh has this interesting post about a Second Circuit decision issued yesterday that I previously noted at this link.

«These amendments do not, however, resolve our concern with how some lawyer referral services operate in Florida,» reads the majority opinion, «especially those that refer clients to other professionals and occupational disciplines for services arising from the same incident.»

I may have some comments in a later post once I have a chance to read the majority opinion and the two concurrences.

Not exact matches

My point is that millions of poeple have read the bible and there is no clear majority opinion as to what it says on several major points.

Like many social conservatives, especially Christian ones, I spend a lot of my time reading and writing about religious freedom, especially how it might be affected by the legalization of same - sex marriage and the campaign for «gay rights» more generally.Yet at the same time, I harbor doubts about the position we are staking out.You see, I sometimes think that Justice Scalia's majority opinion in Employment Division v. Smith may have been correct.

I still remember my great disappointment in reading Chief Justice Burger's opinion in Lemon, but I hoped then that we would, some day, have a Supreme Court majority that would recognize the paramount importance of the Free Exercise Clause.

At times Im not sure what kills more brain cells, a multiple day bender or reading the opinions of the majority of fans on this forum that constantly overrate our players.

... As I read the filed opinions, a majority of the Court would approve statutes that provided for a moment of silence but did not mention prayer.

The 2012 AAEP Horse Owner - Trainer Veterinary Services Survey revealed that vets are highly valued and trusted, with a strong majority of the respondents saying that they value their vets» opinions more than anything they might read on the Internet.

The 2012 AAEP Horse Owner - Trainer Veterinary Services Survey revealed that veterinarians are highly valued and trusted, with a strong majority of the 6,148 respondents saying that they value their veterinarians» opinions more than anything they might read on the Internet.

How exactly are you proving your point when you admit (emphasis mine)... «yes, the temperature moved FIRST» and you make hidden conciliatory statements like... «for the MAJORITY of that time» and then you freely admit... «CO2 did not trigger the warmings» and then you rely on the lamest of hollow arguments... «according to climate THEORY and model EXPERIMENTS» and then you stumble back to close with complete opinion and conjecture... «we may well» and «The likely candidates» Anyone with a brain will read your post and laugh - it's pathetic and you've actually done nothing but strengthen the skeptics argument.

He compared the output of his 10 - person publication (which includes a print edition, a Web site with daily content, a blog with 15 to 20 items each day and a video operation) with that of his 27 - person L.A Times «Opinion» division that created just two pages each day in the newspaper, the majority of which was written by others and read by no one, he says.

(Stevens had no majority opinion from that sitting; Rehnquist had two, and the other one was the majority opinion in the Miranda blockbuster Dickerson v. United States; and to my eyes at least, Stevens» dissent, with its detailed statement of facts, reads like a converted majority opinion.)

And yet, even though Cunningham majority opinion had six votes for a seemingly strong view of the Court's Sixth Amendment work, reading all the opinions in Rita gives me the impression that only three Justices (Justices Scalia, Souter and Thomas) are deeply concerned with safeguarding, in Justice Souter's words, «the guarantee of a robust right of jury trial.»

A code opinion was the majority opinion, annotated so a computer could read it.

the majority's opinion raises the concerning possibility that the Court's new reading of section 96 in conjunction with the rule of law principle may be used to undermine existing provincial authority over access to alternative dispute resolution, and private international law more generally.

(The majority opinion is worth reading for its illumination of current law on this question.)

Government has no skin in the game, except at the ballot box, and non-professional Realtors (the vast majority of the Realtor population, in my opinion) are mightily outnumbered by the masses of consumers... who read (unlike most Realtors) and think about stuff that affects their lives... which leads to their determination of vote selections.