Sentences with phrase «reading view which»

Not exact matches

Three facets of today's U.S. civic discourse would worry the Framers, said Eisgruber: «mistrust of institutions,» which they considered crucial to forming a republic; the «geographic sorting» that finds people of like - minded views grouping together rather than being more evenly distributed throughout the country; and the rise of technologies (read: Facebook) that are keeping people from reading facts and views that give them proper «civic understanding.»

Publisher Springer Nature has built «SharedIt,» which allows readers on a number of media websites to view read - only versions of their articles without a paywall.

«Reading can offer richer, broader and more complex models of experience, which enable people to view their own lives from a refreshed perspective and with renewed understanding,» says Josie Billington of the University of Liverpool, who's an expert on the effects of rReading can offer richer, broader and more complex models of experience, which enable people to view their own lives from a refreshed perspective and with renewed understanding,» says Josie Billington of the University of Liverpool, who's an expert on the effects of readingreading.

«The point of the «about us» page is to educate visitors about your business, which means it should be interesting to read, view or interact with.

At the same time, we view the improvement in global conditions as contributing to investor complacency, which has been reflected in subdued volatility index readings in Europe and the United States during 2017.

Yesterday I was reading an interesting point of view expressed in an editorial in The Financial Post which perhaps you saw.

The key is «listening,» which in the world of content marketing, really means reading (of course you may also be «playing» and «viewing» media assets that showcase multimedia).

Lars Christensen's blog The Market Monetarist, which I make sure to read regularly, used the recent centenary of Milton Friedman's birth to discuss Friedman's views...

Last year I wrote on Suven Life Sciences, also I did some secondary level maths to get a sense of returns an investor could get buying the business at then market cap (~ 2000 INR Crores or 400 Million USD) and exiting in 2024 See Snap shot below The base case CAGR didn't excite but reading management commentary compelled me to take a tracking position in model portfolio Over to this year One thing in AR gave me a Jeff Bezos moment For the first time management was sounding optimistic (this is coming from a management which is very conservative on record) Emphasis mine Management views on past Despite having grown the business every single year across the last five years, our business sustainability has been consistently questioned.

Well beyond clicks and views, this taxonomy - driven tool delivered real insights into which content pieces were (and weren't) being read, shared, commented on, shared again and so on.

Read Rodney Stark's «The Rise of Christianity» to get a realistic view of the radical changes Christianity brought about in the Roman Empire... many of which are * assumed * as rights in modern Western Civilization.

But in a week of coverage, much of which is sure to be either generically retrospective or gleefully judgmental (a Reuters article I came across yesterday made sure to note, in its final paragraph, that his papacy had been «besieged» by the sexual abuse crisis — a claim which, aside from its mild bias, is not exactly accurate), it's refreshing to read a piece that takes a longer view.

read its views on earth and sun etc. which is terribly flawed.

When you read through the Bible chapter for chapter one will get a broader view or the full context about what happened, maybe where it happened why it did happen and for which purpose it happened but: «All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:..»

Reading breathless media reports about CO2 «pollution» and about minimizing our carbon footprints, one might think that the earth can not have too little CO2, as Simpson thought one couldn't be too thin — a view which was also overstated, as we have seen from the sad effects of anorexia in so many young women.

Depending upon which Biblical software one is using, one can see anything from a dozen to 10,000 manuscripts, to view the variant readings in context.

For to Jews the Holocaust is not an event to read about in a few books, or to remember on a few special occasions; it is for them to confront, to agonize over, to reject and resist, to search deeply and widely for a glimmer of hope - all this with a view to a Jewish self - understanding, of which an essential part is being heir of the murdered millions, the remnant of the catastrophe.

We do not read it, or any other texts, as a literal instruction manual for life, but rather as a living, breathing text which we can view with fresh eyes each time we open it.

The presentation supposes that it is theological views that at least trigger developments in the other areas, which is understandable in a book that proposes a theological reading, not a sociological analysis, of developments in marriage customs.

All this is to say that Wendy is not yet convinced of my view, but wants me to incorporate an alternative view (which I shared with her a few months ago but have not ever read anywhere else) into this new view.

The Christian view is that God, in the form of Jesus, was his own servant, which is ridiculous in relation to how Isaiah 53 reads.Also, verse 10 reads «he shall see [his] seed, he shall prolong [his] days».

More recently, I read some entries in the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament which challenged my thinking regarding the view of inspiration itself.

from what i read the american people are idolizing the bald eagle which also from a religous point of view is agianst God's law.

Many will choose to stop reading here because they've figured out where I'm going but that shows the unwillingness to consider any other option, which is the same fault that you complain about; I ask that you take just a moment to consider my point of view.

If what you read contradicts what you discovered on your own, you must weigh the arguments that are used against the arguments you used, and decide which view is best.

For those who have defended the traditional interpretation of the resurrection of Jesus as an historical event involving the raising and removal of a physical body, that which has carried most weight is simply the fact that, on a plain reading of the New Testament, the Bible itself seems to give unqualified support to such a view, in some places if not in all.

He has a take on angels, Satan, and demons which I have never heard before, and which seems to fit the biblical text in a way that, if true, would cause me to read much of Scripture in a whole different way, and which would cause me to view life, and governments, and cities, and politics, and animals, and plants and pretty much everything in a whole new way also.

In this period, it is true, the J writer, according to the generally accepted view, was penning his remarkable history, which, like every history worth reading, was also a philosophy.

In other words, J. Denny Weaver's approach in this book is that he read a bunch of books on the atonement, and then wrote 5 - 10 pages summarizing the views and arguments of each book, which are then all compiled into this book on the atonement.

There are always pessimistic and optimistic views over Islam but my religion teaches peace and humanity and jihad is to resist against wrong no matter if some one have same faith, it can be through writing also and please if u haven't read my religion, (which I can see) then please DO N'T comment.

Clearly you need to do some more reading on what the contraceptive mentality is and how it distorts our views on babies, and how even the Supreme Court has described abortion as a fall - back when contraceptives fail (which they do).

His view of faith, grace and salvation apart from the law has become the lens through which episodes like the story of the sinful woman and the Pharisee are read.

The direct evidence consists of what Whitehead himself tells us, first, about how his books are meant to be read and understood, about the genesis of his ideas, and about modifications in his views; and second, about the nature of his thinking, about his difficulties in translating his thoughts into words, about the sources of his philosophical terminology, and about the peculiar manner in which he composed his books.

Borges's poetics of reading does not obviously examine literary history from a chronological point of view, a linear mode according to which precursors invariably connect themselves from one life to another — and on toward the present.

Certainly the Bible bears witness to the wonderful works of God, the signs and miracles of His grace, but it is anachronistic to read into these affirmations a much later understanding of miracle, one which belongs particularly to the medieval view of the interpenetration of the two worlds — the natural and supernatural.

Such a view is based on a reading of the household codes that elevates their cultural context over their gospel message (and sometimes on a misunderstanding of the creation narrative, which I discuss here).

I myself bought my iPad almost solely for the purpose of spiritual blogging on the bus (which I am doing right now), and it has given me more time to think about these matters and to read a much larger diversity of views than I would otherwise.

In other words, this position has several elements and perspectives, depending on which book you read or which scholar you listen to, but the main elements of this theory are described below (Note: Many hold various versions of this view, but you can read one summary of it on the Eternity Bible College blog).

I used to agree with the predominant Christian view on this topic, until I began reading observations which challenged this viewpoint.

I find, for example, the five following characteristics in these liturgies: (1) an affinity with the liturgies of the ancient church; (2) an order that follows the pattern of revelation and Christian experience; (3) a significant emphasis on reading and hearing the Word of God; (4) a high degree of congregational involvement; and (s) a view of the Lord's Supper which affirms its mystery and value for spiritual formation.

Aside from the fact that this is an example of that penal substitution view rearing it's head, for in this view, God hates sin, and is angry at sinners, and so must kill His Son as a way to appease His own wrath against sin (which doesn't make much biblical or theological sense), the real reason I was shocked to read this statement is because it is the exact opposite of what Paul actually says in Romans 8:32!

It seems to me that both Against the Nations and The Peaceable Kingdom, the two books Hauerwas has published since which directly develop his views in Christian theology (he has published other books in the time on other topics), can be read in the light of them.

I think the discrepancy lies in the fact that theology is the remaking of the word of God into something academic — which is, of course, the antithesis of reading with a view to do.

On the other side there are certainly many passages which run counter to O'Connor's theory in that they take for granted the centrality of signification for St Thomas's view of the Mass as the representation of Calvary, as anyone reading the Summa on the Eucharist will quickly discover.

Why then are there Atheist that report that there is this book or that which all of us Faithful should read to change our entire view of life and Faith?

I have found my training posts are my most viewed... which surprises me, but I guess we learn what people want to read Tina Muir recently posted... Pool Running to Maintain Fitness During Injury

Arsenal, meanwhile, will be big favourites to beat Championship side Reading at Wembley, which may not make terrific viewing for neutrals who would normally keep an eye on a big game at the late stage of the popular FA Cup competition.

I've just read the latest article on arseblog, which have some very interesting and valid view on the issue.

we have no chance of signing benatia i recently read an article where bayern said they wouldn, t sell him and even if they did benatia said he wouldn, t be against a return to roma for whom he played for, also bayern turned down an offer from juventus to sign benatia first on a season loan (2millions) with a view to buy him, a similar deal to the one they have with kingsley coman between the 2 clubs also juventus have a very good relationship with bayern because of the sale of vidal and loan of coman which put them in a better position than us!!

If you are interested in supporting this good cause and are also keen on reading great articles about United players, check out the RoM 2013 - 14 season review and World Cup PDF which has professional writers from each country our players represent talking about how they are viewed back home.