This page highlights examples of successful state strategy and policies to implement the College - and Career -
Ready standards in the State Education Agency (SEA) Common Core Implementation: Progress and Capacity Rubric.
Not exact matches
We remain
ready to support both the federal and
state governments
in establishing
standard technical and vocational training facilities which will be useful
in providing skills to women and youth of this country.
Nothing about these learning pathways is
in conflict with the call for higher career - and college -
ready standards, such as the Common Core
State Standards adopted by 45
states and new science
standards adopted so far by a smaller number.
The success of the Massachusetts approach has important implications, especially as
states roll out the new Common Core
standards academic goals for what students should be able to do
in reading and math at each grade level to ensure high school students graduate
ready for the demands of higher education and the 21st century workforce.
It's one thing if Congress goes along with such an approach — and if
states are given a reasonable amount of time to demonstrate that their own
standards are
in fact set at a college -
ready level.
It is vital students, parents and educators receive reliable and valid information on student achievement of
standards, student growth, and whether students are on - track to being college and career
ready regardless of what
state they reside
in.
As we work with
states in developing these systems, one of the key components is making sure the information is translatable for parents, that they can understand what percentage of students
in that school who are mastering
standards and achieving grade - level expectations and whether or not those students are going to be
ready to graduate from high school and be successful
in college.
One of the greatest challenges that the education community faces
in implementing the Common Core
State Standards (CCSS) initiative is ensuring that the education workforce is
ready to help students succeed under these new, higher
standards.
Require
states to back - map achievement
standards down to at least third grade, so that passing the
state assessment
in each grade indicates that a student is on track to graduate from twelfth grade
ready for college or a career.
Even
in non-Common Core
states, there are new demands on instruction called for by «college and career
ready standards» that merit investigation.
If the assessments that
states use
in connection with the Common Core don't match the
standards» ambitious learning expectations, then few young people will end up learning what they will need (
in these two subjects) to be truly college and career
ready.
Most governors,
state commissioners of education,
state boards of education, and Chambers of Commerce seem to have an unshakable confidence
in Common Core's
standards as the silver bullet that will make all K - 12 students college and career
ready.
These insights were embedded into college - and career -
ready standards that most
states adopted
in 2010.
As teachers and administrators gain a better understanding of the new, more rigorous Common Core
State Standards and other college - and career -
ready expectations
in mathematics, they will need to understand which
standards are the most challenging for students so they can make the most of their instructional time to ensure students are successful.
In states operating Title I programs under ESEA accountability waivers, curriculum content
standards and assessments must meet the additional requirement of evaluating whether students are «college and career -
ready.»
Race to the Top rewarded
states with hundreds of millions of dollars
in exchange for the adoption of new college - and career -
ready assessments aligned to higher
standards, among other requirements, but the Education Department didn't define those
standards or tests.
The other $ 4 billion was intended by Congress to fund grants to help
states improve
in four key areas: building data systems, adopting «career - and - college
ready»
standards and tests, hiring great teachers and principals, and turning around low - performing schools.
Back
in 2009 and 2010, when the Common Core was adopted by a host of
states ready to promise pretty much anything
in exchange for Race to the Top funds, it was fueled by twin promises: It would «raise
standards» and it would make it easier to compare how schools and
states were faring
in reading and math.
As for ESEA flexibility waivers, a condition of receiving a federal waiver from No Child Left Behind was that
states have
in place «college - and career -
ready standards.»
The groups say that this role must be maintained
in any bill to reauthorize the ESEA, along with ensuring that each
state adopts college and career -
ready state standards, aligned statewide annual assessments, and a
state accountability system to improve instruction and learning for students
in low - performing schools.
One of the most ambitious educational improvement projects
in recent years was the adoption of new, more rigorous college - and career -
ready academic
standards by more than 40 U.S.
states.
In many states, the standards are more rigorous than what were in place before, which is why supporters of the standards say this «big thing» will eventually produce more high school graduates who are truly ready for colleg
In many
states, the
standards are more rigorous than what were
in place before, which is why supporters of the standards say this «big thing» will eventually produce more high school graduates who are truly ready for colleg
in place before, which is why supporters of the
standards say this «big thing» will eventually produce more high school graduates who are truly
ready for college.
Michigan is one of 42
states to receive a waiver from the 13 - year - old federal law
in exchange for implementing requirements like career - and college -
ready standards, stronger school accountability
standards and a system to evaluate teachers and identify underperforming ones.
We are all for having our students be «college and career
ready,» but we're not sure that the socioeconomic infrastructure is there yet to support student, teachers, and schools
in meeting the Common Core
standard's definition of that
state of readiness (p8).
U.S. Department of Education Assistant Secretary Deborah Delisle wrote
in a letter to Oklahoma
state Superintendent Janet Barresi that the state's waiver was denied because Oklahoma «can no longer demonstrate that the State's standards are college - and career - ready standards.&r
state Superintendent Janet Barresi that the
state's waiver was denied because Oklahoma «can no longer demonstrate that the State's standards are college - and career - ready standards.&r
state's waiver was denied because Oklahoma «can no longer demonstrate that the
State's standards are college - and career - ready standards.&r
State's
standards are college - and career -
ready standards.»
ESSA retains the requirement that
states test all students
in reading and math
in grades three through eight and once
in high school, as well as the requirement that
states ensure those tests align with
states» college - and career -
ready standards.
The
state is among the top 10 for having proficiency
standards aligned with the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP); one of seven
states selected for a National Math Science Initiative grant; one of the eight
states participating
in Career and College -
ready Policy Institute mentioned previously.
The bill would require
states to have «college and career -
ready standards» for student performance and would replace a system of proficiency targets that labeled many schools as failing with a focus on federal intervention
in underperforming schools.
Rep. Todd Rokita of Indiana, the top Republican on the subcommittee overseeing K - 12 policy, also asked about language
in the administration's budget request that would provide $ 389 million
in assessment grants to
states that have adopted college - and career -
ready standards.
The pause proposal that passed the General Assembly this spring keeps Indiana's current assessment, the ISTEP,
in place until the
State Board of Education has reaffirmed its support of the Common Core or adopted other college - and career -
ready standards.
What they are: The Common Core
State Standards are a set of academic
standards in language arts and math that have been adopted
in more than 40
states and intended to be the guideposts for children from kindergarten through 12th grade to ensure that they are
ready for college and employment.
But there's concern that just pausing implementation could put Indiana's No Child Left Behind waiver
in jeopardy, as
states had to adopt of college - and career -
ready standards to win approval.
As the
state struggles to bring common core curriculum
standards into California classrooms, Elk Grove Unified School District is far enough along to
ready plans for testing its students midway through the coming school year on the new content goals
in math and English.
If Common Core aligned high schools prepare students for community college (as the writers have of the
standards have
stated) those who «pass» these new
standards should theoretically be
ready for Common Core Community College — but can automatically get
in and get tutoring to get
in even if not
ready: http://www.cga.ct.gov/2012/act/pa/pdf/2012PA-00040-R00SB-00040-PA.pdf
The focus
in each
state is to build comprehensive professional learning systems aligned with college and career
ready standards and systems of educator effectiveness.
She told board members she's worried the panel reviewing the
state's academic
standards has too many professors of math education and too few professors of mathematics, who she says are
in a better position to say what skills students need to be
ready for college - level coursework.
Frederick M. Hess, a resident scholar and the director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, blamed the widespread testing problems
in part on federal pressure to quickly introduce new assessments based on the Common Core
State Standards in many
states, and other new college and career -
ready standards in others.
To even be eligible for funding,
states had to promise that they would fully adopt a set of common college - and career -
ready standards supplemented with only 15 % of their own
standards.2 Applicants also had to demonstrate that they would expand their
state's longitudinal data system to be
in the same format as other
states and to contain new data including student health, demographics, and success
in postsecondary education.3
adopt a common set of college - and career -
ready standards «substantially identical across all
States in a consortium» by December 31, 2011, and implement the
standards by the 2014 — 15 school year;
The first On the Same Page document was intended to serve as a tool to support
state level agencies and district organizations
in collaboratively developing a plan that sets direction and determines support for implementation of college - and - career -
ready standards.
In 2013, WestEd, the Understanding Language Initiative of Stanford University, and the Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO) developed a set of English Language Proficiency (ELP)
Standards that correspond to
states» college - and career -
ready (CCR)
standards for English language arts, mathematics, and science.
We've collaborated with the Collaboration for Effective Educators Development, Accountability and Reform (CEEDAR) Center and The National Center for Systemic Improvement (NCSI) as well as launched a diverse coalition of organizations to support
states in their efforts to develop teachers and leader who can successfully prepare students with disabilities to achieve college and career -
ready standards.
By combining existing research with the latest PISA data, The Deepest Learners offers four recommendations based on practices
in high - performing countries that can inform policymakers on the implication for deeper learning as
states move forward to implement college - and career -
ready standards.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the voluntary benchmarks were strongly pushed by the Obama administration through its $ 4.35 billion Race to the Top education - grant competition, which rewarded
states bonus points
in their applications if they instituted changes like «college and career
ready»
standards.
In exchange, the
states had to set their own
standards for student success, by implementing college and career -
ready standards and developing solid accountability systems, among other things.
The tests, delivered
in grades 3 - 8 and 11, were developed by
states and are aligned to college - and career -
ready standards.
In exchange for relief, the administration is requiring a quid pro quo:
States must adopt changes that include meaningful teacher and principal evaluation systems, make sure all students are
ready for college or careers, upgrade academic
standards and lift up their lowest - performing schools.
Past fellows have written op - eds for major news publications, participated
in state and national - level discussions with policymakers on education initiatives, and developed recommendations and solutions for enhancing teacher effectiveness systems as well as college and career
ready standards implementation, as outlined
in the Teacher Evaluation Playbook.
Central to that debate is Common Core, a set of universal, college -
ready academic
standards in reading and math developed by
state education officials.
Reflected
in the college and career -
ready standards being implemented across the United
States, an emphasis has been placed on preparing students with both the literacy and technology skills needed to succeed
in postsecondary education and the workforce.