Sentences with phrase «real gods require»
Filed Under: Articles and Opinions, Ben Robins, London Film Festival, Movies Tagged With: 61st BFI London Film Festival, Charlotte Regan, Fry Up, Great Choice, Kate Herron, Moin Hussain, Real Gods Require Blood, Shogun, Slap Happy, Smear, The Comeback Kid, The Night I Dance With Death, Turbo Killer, Wave
https://www.flickeringmyth.com/ Not exact matches
Real worship, for Evangelicals, would seem to require a saving knowledge of God, and a heart transformed through conversion to worship him.
Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.
Things are real here before us, and have no absence that requires God.
Zeus on the other hand has been proven real, he said so himself and he said everyone, all the other gods in other cultures are fakes...» = > upon what are you basing your positive belief (you slipped up there in acknowledging atheism requires a positive disbelief in a diety
Gratitude to God requires that we live not by evading the real nature of existence, not by denying the violent character of nature and history, but by facing reality as best we can, finally affirming the whole of life in all its sorrow and pain as a great gift.
Yet it will also require a countercultural way of life, a deep faith in the goodness of God and in the intelligibility of creation, and real hope in the transcendent vantage, beyond our immanent success or failure, opened up by the Resurrection.
I am open minded when it comes to «real truth» but real truth requires real evidence of which there is none for a god.
The real trouble is that Augustine and the classical theological tradition not only affirmed the mystery but also insisted that God's perfection requires his absolute changelessness.
The position that gods that are impossible to exist are not real, likewise requires no faith.
The result is that America is a nation deeply divided between people who are concerned about real - life issues — war and peace, social justice, the health and welfare of people — on one hand, and other people who are concerned, instead, about «values,» by which they mean adherence to ancient taboos, dependence on a magical God, enforcing acceptance of ancient creeds, requiring everyone to believe as they do, and finding safety in raw (though often hidden) social and economic power.
For «spiffy» not to be written by a real human being will require just as big a miracle as «God» being written by God.
For in fact the world is not patient of deity in any real sense, if at the crucial point it is required that God thus break into his own ordering of things» (p. 108).
I would like to hear sermons giving shape to possibilities of human delight in the future God intends for us and setting forth the moral imperatives that are required to make the ideal real.
not sure i said this before or not, i have been on cnn.com for over a year — anyway — i have been going to random churches, temples, really place that worships any form of the of abraham and others — i have yet to get anywhere but where i started from — which is what i am, what i am meant to be, and what i was... only this has been gained — gained is a gift of a word for i knew all of this before i started and so i view my time as wasted only for this the reason of getting somewhere — i did meet many great people with great views but all required the very real existence of god which was something lacking and why they had a constant failure yet what they called «keeping the faith» att itude type results... something was missing or missunderstood — your take?
«Again, respect of persons, in uncovering the head and bowing the knee or body in salutation, was a practice I had been much in the use of; and this, being one of the vain customs of the world, introduced by the spirit of the world, instead of the true honor which this is a false representation of, and used in deceit as a token of respect by persons one to another, who bear no real respect one to another; and besides this, being a type and a proper emblem of that divine honor which all ought to pay to Almighty God, and which all of all sorts, who take upon them the Christian name, appear in when they offer their prayers to him, and therefore should not be given to men; - I found this to be one of those evils which I had been too long doing; therefore I was now required to put it away and cease from it.
A real belief in God requires true openness and, frankly, that's pretty scary.
You do not have a single piece of evidence, let alone the large amount of supporting evidence required to show god is real - you know, real as in «reality.»
To follow Jesus requires us not to choose 12 disciples or to turn water into wine but to take his life project — making the coming of God's reign of Shalom real and immediate — our own.
It is particularly true for the atheist / agnostic there is the real consequence of abandoning possible portions of our humanity that are pulled to God and require God (eg.
If a non-skeptical bias is required to reach what you view as the «correct» interpretation of the bible, and if different viewpoints result in different interpretations, then your «god» really must have a communication weakness, and therefore is not a real god with the characteristics that are being claimed for it.
If a non-skeptical bias is required to reach what you happen to view as the «correct» interpretation of the bible, and if different viewpoints result in different interpretations, then your «god» really must have a communication weakness, and therefore is not a real god with the characteristics that are being claimed for it.
And congratulations for having the gnat's ass - worth of sense that it requires to realize that God is real, and fetuses are humans.