Sentences with phrase «recent decisions point»

Recent decisions point to two trends that may impact you.

Not exact matches

The recent decision by Ford, Renault, Volkswagen and Nissan to expand their production in Spain is a case in point.

«And we are now at a decision point: sustained global commitments and recent funding cuts affect capacity and capability for a full - spectrum fight against a near - peer adversary.»

The memo points out that in recent decisions, the statutory mandate to exclude value arising from the merger itself has strongly influenced the approach to valuation.

In fact, a recent Think with Google report confirmed that nearly 75 % of B2B buyers were watching video during some point in the purchase decision.

He pointed to the president's recent decision to impose tariffs on imports of solar panels and washing machines, as well as ongoing renegotiations of trade deals with Canada, Mexico and South Korea, as ways in which the United States would narrow the trade gap.

A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision raises two interesting points concerning the obligations of corporations that undertake mergers with subsidiaries

In recent years, however, many have challenged the decision - point model of morality.

However, the de Blasio administration is entitled to cancel the City's contract with QDG, and to rescind the sale of two acres of Willets Point property already transferred to QDG for $ 1, due to the recent decision of the New York State Court of Appeals which found that QDG's proposed «Willets West» mega-mall on parkland located west of Citi Field stadium can not proceed as it lacks legislative approval.

State Sen. James Sanders (D - Jamaica) pointed to recent attempts to dissuade minority voters from casting their votes in the 2012 presidential election and blasted the court's decision.

In recent months, the city's battle over school segregation has played out in a few specific schools in some of the its fastest - gentrifying (or already gentrified - to - saturation - point) neighborhoods: Nikole Hannah - Jones chronicled the Brooklyn version of the saga in her much - discussed New York Times Magazine piece last weekend, «Choosing a School for My Daughter in a Segregated City,» about her decision to send her black daughter to a mostly minority school, only to have that school rezoned to include an affluent, predominantly white population.

Megan McArdle notes in a recent article in the Atlantic that one of the worst decisions anyone can make from a financial point of view is to start a business.

I talk to someone who does research on gaming addiction about the concept in general, how hard it is to research it, and the APA's recent decision to (possibly, at some point in the future) include Internet Gaming Disorder as a real mental disorder in the handbook psychiatrists use to diagnose someone.

- It appears that Activision has backtracked on its recent decision to shutter Underground Development (formerly Z - Axis) at the end of May, since the Foster City, CA studio is «currently working on an expansion for the highly rated Guitar Hero series,» according to some web pages Vox Populi was pointed to.

He also points to a recent paper that had questioned Christy and Spencer's decision to use preliminary data in their congressional testimony while it was still in the peer review stage: [44]

In an email on Tuesday, he pointed to two recent court decisions.

I've also appreciated Steven's recent arguments here on CA that Climategate has to have been an inside job, not least because of the cute decision to hack RealClimate to kick the game off (a point that has always seemed dead obvious to me, however much spin about nefarious hacking has been employed).

One need only point to Shell's recent decision to restart its deep drilling efforts (since cancelled) in the Arctic.

For example, the New York and Alabama bar sites are «excellent» because of their extensive tools, but she takes points off the ABA's score, «in light of its recent penny - pinching decision to cut the Solo and Small Firm Standing Committee within the ABA.»

Of particular interest on this point is the recent decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in R. v. W. (P.H.L.), which appears to contemplate an expanded role for amicus.

The searches we executed with this tool, which still targeted a couple of recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions, pointed the class to the highly informative blog thecourt.ca (housed at Osgoode), which, I suspect, is now a bookmarked site for the students.

He quotes Adam Feldman, a postdoctoral fellow at Columbia Law School and creator of a high court statistics blog, Empirical SCOTUS, as saying some recent decisions had fractured the justices, with each seemingly wanting to have their own say, which «shows they're having trouble finding that point of consensus not along ideological grounds.»

If a lawyer asks for a copy of a court decision, it is a matter of minutes at little or no cost to also provide the lawyer note - up records for the decision along with leading case comments, blog posts and more recent cases on point, something many lawyers might not do (or might not know how to do) for themselves.

A recent decision of the BC Court of Appeal in Donell v. GJB Enterprises Inc., 2012 BCCA 135 has given me an opportunity to do what annoying lawyers do best - pick apart a minor, inconsequential plot point in a tv show.

The key question for the Upper Tribunal in the recent decision in Denley v HMRC was whether the Excise Goods (Holding, Movement and Duty Point) Regulations 2010 were in breach of the EU Excise Directive (Directive 92 / 12 / EEC).

Whilst the recent decision focuses on some important points, i.e. that a costs order was already in place, it follows that where parties wish to suggest that the ABTA mediation scheme should be used, such suggestions need to be made at an early stage and certainly before the case settles and an order for costs is made.

The importance of the third point above is demonstrated by the recent decision of the European Union Court of Justice (EUCJ) which in September 2014 gave judgment in the appeal from the General Court in the dispute between the Groupement des cartes bancaires and the European Commission (Groupement des cartes bancaires v European Commission C - 67 / 13 P (CB)-RRB-.

Among the opinions offered on the case by this country's jurisprudes, Michael Geist has pointed out how Justice Phelan's ruling runs contrary to a recent series of Supreme Court decisions that have taken «a broad, liberal approach to fair dealing,» and he imagines that the appeal could makes its way to the Supreme Court.

Then I'll point to recent enough Ontario Court of Appeal decision — Donley Investment Ltd. v Canril Corporation 2011 ONCA 625 where there is no uncertainty at all in what the Court said about why the trial decision was wrong in law.

This point has been exercised recently in the US courts in relation to shareholder claims but whereas there have been some indications that the US court would entertain claims from English shareholders, recent decisions show a more conservative approach as to who can sue there.

On the other hand, this equally recent decision of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal shows that some judges of that court get the point.

Hold informal «lunch and learn» sessions to discuss topics of shared professional interest, e.g., substantive legal points, recent court decisions, legislative actions, case developments, or firm clients.

Michael also raised a number of interesting points from the recent decision in Breyer Group plc & Ors v Department of Energy and Climate Change [2015] EWCA Civ 408 regarding the successful Human Rights damages claims (A1P1) by a group of solar panel companies, which arose from the effects of the (lawful) consultation in relation to an unlawful proposal.

As Mummery LJ points out in the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Birmingham City Council v Abdulla [2011] EWCA Civ 1412, [2011] All ER (D) 210 (Nov) there have been many issues exercising / plaguing the law on equal pay over the last few years, but choice of forum has not been one of them — until now.

ICBC also pointed to the fact that 80 per cent of customers reporting an injury claim had no previous recent claims, indicating their decision to obtain a lawyer had more to do with outside factors such as advice from friends and family or marketing by legal firms.

More to the point, it's hard to claim that the CBC has a compelling interest in removing Mr Ghomeshi from his post for the purposes of protecting his fellow employees — he's not accused of assaulting his co-workers (there is an allegation of sexual harassment, although it's not clear what role that played in the CBC's decision — the CBC referred to «recent» information, the allegation of harassment appears to be older — and in any event doesn't appear to rise to the level of a criminal act).

Despite this, Kennedy continued to re-argue the same points in her most recent submission, according to the decision.

Further, recent decisions of the English courts concerning the law of privilege (for instance, in relation to the identity of the client (for the purposes of legal advice privilege), [26] and when litigation is reasonably in contemplation (for the purposes of litigation privilege, in the context of a criminal investigation)[27] point towards a more restrictive interpretation of the scope of the protection that it offers.

Delegate Feldman also referenced the recent ONCA decision of Economical Mutual Insurance Company v. Caughy in support of the point that a vehicle need not be active / moving to be considered «operational».

I point out this recent decision to applaud the Supreme Court for disbarring these guilty lawyers, and also to inform people that hiring runners is a practice used only by the worst of the worst.

(At this point, I can't help but mention that in recent years the late Mr. Hendrix also has become legendary in Seattle courts for his role in fashioning decisions on the right of publicity and the trademark use of his likeness, signature, and name in connection with commercial products like artwork and vodka.)

A recent Telegraph article on Asbestos claims arising from a landmark legal decision of Sienkiewicz v Greif and Knowsley MBC v Willmore is a case in point.

We all know this to be a fact, but a couple of recent Ontario Superior Court decisions drive home the point.

Reiterating a point we discussed earlier, however, maybe enough has already been done in this area with the Supreme Court's recent fee - shifting decisions, including in Octane Fitness.

Belobaba J. pointed out that while his opinion was more consistent with the latter interpretation, the debate may have been decided in favour of the more lenient interpretation by the Supreme Court of Canada's recent decision in R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada, 2011 SCC 42.

He has been involved in a number of significant High Court decisions in recent years, one of which established a new point of law relating to the consequences of terminating a multi-party LLP agreement by repudiation.

Two recent court decisions illustrate key practice points for in - house counsel of companies contemplating significant transactions that will give use to shareholder dissent rights.

Hmm, TWU supporters rest their case on a recent SCC decision directly on point.

The recent decision of Kim v. International Triathlon Union, 2014 BCSC 2151 is a good illustration of that point and how... [more]

Both of these recent EAT decisions (under respectively Judge Burke and Lady Smith) were primarily concerned with other issues, but each raised incidental points on the uplift which could be of general importance.