Sentences with phrase «recent literature shows»

Recent findings Recent literature shows that bullying behaviors are common in children as young as kindergarten age, that there is a strong association between being a bully or victim and a range of psychosomatic and depressive symptoms in children, and that interventions including family therapy and school - based programs are effective for bullies and victims.

How about you address the actual scientific literature, including the more recent literature showing increasing water vapor and positive water vapor feedback?

Not exact matches

Another expert, University of Georgia meteorology professor Marshall Shepherd, said that «while we have to be careful about knee - jerk cause - effect discussions, the National Academy of Science and recent peer - reviewed literature continue to show that some of today's extremes have climate change fingerprints on them.»

There is a finely graded inverse association between age and cognitive performance, 3 4 5 but the age at which cognitive decline becomes evident at the population level remains the subject of debate.5 6 7 A recent review of the literature concluded that there was little evidence of cognitive decline before the age of 60.8 This point of view, however, is not universally accepted.5 6 Clinicopathological studies show good correlation between neuropathology and the severity of cognitive decline, 9 10 11 and neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid plaques, the hallmarks of pathology, are known to be present in the brains of young adults.12 13 Emerging consensus on the long gestation period of dementia14 15 also suggests that adults aged under 60 are likely to experience age related cognitive decline.

, recent studies shows that our brains are more likely to retain information and comprehend more clearly when we read on paper, which makes sense, since we've all become «skimmers» of online content (I was an English literature major, and now I skip over anything that looks like it's more than a five - minute read).

Unfortunately I do not have any statistics for Canada and Australia, however recent literature has shown that within the USA alone, the incidence of pelvic floor dysfunction is going to rise from 28.1 million WOMEN in 2010, to 43.8 million in 2050 (1).

The optimal intake level is called a «set point,» and recent literature has shown that set points can be different for everyone.

The recent medical literature shows that low testosterone is associated with increased mortality.

Studies show that it will take most doctors and specialists, on average, 17 years to adapt these cutting - edge therapies into their practices even though they are highly supported in the most recent medical literature.

In recent articles, we have put these mistaken notions to rest by showing the extensive scientific literature on the benefits of cod liver oil and vitamin A, as well as on the synergistic - rather than antagonistic - relationship of vitamins A and D. To bolster our premise that vitamin A is not toxic and that vitamin D can be obtained from food sources, we have published many articles on traditional diets, showing the high levels of vitamins A and D in traditional foods.

One recent study reduced the anxiety levels in mice just by giving them yoghurt bacteria [2] «There is growing literature showing a strong correlation between gut health and mental wellbeing,» says Judy, who suggests trying her Berry Yoghurt Trifle.

Recent reviews of the scientific literature show that eating saturated fat and cholesterol does not raise cholesterol levels in the blood in most cases, and even if it did, high cholesterol alone does not cause heart disease.

Yet in recent years, the «peer effects» literature has shown the benefits of grouping students of similar abilities together.

This theory has definitely been mentioned in the literature but recent studies in human athletes seem to show that glucose levels may drop to levels that would ordinarily be indicative of hypoglycemia without any clinical signs of low blood sugar levels.

«Now, I am hedging a bet because, to be honest with you, if the hiatus is still going on as of the sixth IPCC report, that report is going to have a large burden on its shoulders walking in the door, because recent literature has shown that the chances of having a hiatus of 18 of 20 years are vanishingly small.»

No, scientific inquiry and results published in peer - reviewed scientific literature have shown the recent global warming is primarily due to anthropogenic GHG emissions.

The best estimates I have been able to find of sulphur emissions — those by Stern (2003), cited in van Vuuren and O'Neill, «The Consistency of IPCC's SRES Scenarios to Recent Literature and Recent Projections», «Climatic Change», March 2006: Table VI on p. 38 — show a steep drop in the first half of the 1990s to a level comparable to that projected in the A1T scenario for 2030.

«Combined with a literature review, the results showed that high N2O emissions from peat decomposition in the tropics tend to be common; which is in contrast with most recent IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] emission factors,» she says.

Comparison with the literature shows that the CSSR draft misleads by omission in not mentioning both the strong decadal ‐ scale variability of GMSL rates during the 20th century and the fact that the most recent values of the rate are statistically indistinguishable from those during the first half of the 20th century.

Monaghan et al. further note «recent literature suggests there has been little overall change in Antarctic near - surface temperature during the past 5 decades» and «the absence of widespread Antarctic temperature increases is consistent with studies showing little overall change in other Antarctic climate indicators during the past 50 years such as sea ice area and snowfall.»

the first was correctly identified on your show, the most recent was the result of a recent literature survey apparently undertaken precisely for the purpose of bolstering the original 97 % estimate.

That said, Plimer's recent Independent Weekly article didn't say much worthy of refutation, but his claim that climate scientists ignore contrary evidence (shall we call these «inconvenient truths») was simply false and shows that he either doesn't read the literature or doesn't mind saying things which are clearly false.