Sentences with phrase «recorded observations show»

Recorded observations show an increase in air temperature which is associated with an earlier onset of hop phenological phases and a shortening of the vegetation period.

Not exact matches

I even created printable recording sheets that kids in preschool and early elementary can use to show their observations.

Six models showed favourable effects on primary outcome measures (e.g., standardized measures of child development outcomes and reduction in behaviour problems).13 Only studies with outcomes using direct observation, direct assessment, or administrative records were included.

But is it a secret that satellites and ground observations show a meltdown in Arctic sea ice that will open new shipping lanes — and security concerns — for the first time in recorded history?

But it seemed that the military kept no record of those observations — that is, until last year when WikiLeaks showed otherwise.

The study is a «painstaking analysis» of the fragmented satellite record and shows some consistency between models and observations of clouds, says meteorologist Bjorn Stevens of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, Germany.

RSS v4 shows about 5 % more warming than the NASA record since 1979, when satellite observations began.

These observations support studies of the postcranial fossil record which have concluded that H. erectus was an obligatory biped, whereas A. africanus showed a locomotor repertoire comprising facultative bipedalism as well as arboreal climbing.

Patient diary records showed observations of smoother and softer skin and wrinkle decreases.

That is, a record must be kept on a longitudinal, per student basis based on observations and measures that show how much GAIN a set of students has made - NOT how many students in a class are (or are not) performing at some standard level.

Huen records observations with fleeting details and transient moments, according to the gallery, showing quotidian experiences with deep sensitivity.

The sea ice concentration record from the Cryosphere Today site shows an unbroken chain of observations from 1979 to 2008.

Internal variability as estimated from observations can't explain sea - ice loss Superposition of a linear trend and internal variability explains sea - ice loss Observational sea - ice record shows no signs of self - acceleration

That doubt was prompted by my own observations of how much a nearby building affected my own readings and has been vindicated by recent surveys of U S recording sites showing a pitiful attention to site standards.

Since Michael Mann felt that he could get away with using falsified tree ring observations from two trees in Siberia to make his hockey stick graph when pollen records show something very different.

He also showed no understanding of how science assembles the collection of observations and analyses, drawing on fundamental conservation laws of energy, etc. (of course, medicine does not have such laws — so maybe that is his problem), into a coherent picture of how the Earth is functioning (and how this matches how the planets are functioning, etc.) and so develops a paradigm for Earth system behavior that incorporates theory, observations, results of field and laboratory studies, paleoclimatic records, and so on.

I think you dismiss the effect of quantitative things like forcing changes and imbalance, and even if I told you the much weaker 11 - year solar forcing cycle is detectable in the temperature record, you would dismiss that on the same principle despite the observations showing it.

Estimates from proxy data1 (for example, based on sediment records) are shown in red (1800 - 1890, pink band shows uncertainty), tide gauge data in blue for 1880 - 2009,2 and satellite observations are shown in green from 1993 to 2012.3 The future scenarios range from 0.66 feet to 6.6 feet in 2100.4 These scenarios are not based on climate model simulations, but rather reflect the range of possible scenarios based on other kinds of scientific studies.

There are, however, caveats: (1) multidecadal fluctuations in Arctic — subarctic climate and sea ice appear most pronounced in the Atlantic sector, such that the pan-Arctic signal may be substantially smaller [e.g., Polyakov et al., 2003; Mahajan et al., 2011]; (2) the sea - ice records synthesized here represent primarily the cold season (winter — spring), whereas the satellite record clearly shows losses primarily in summer, suggesting that other processes and feedback are important; (3) observations show that while recent sea - ice losses in winter are most pronounced in the Greenland and Barents Seas, the largest reductions in summer are remote from the Atlantic, e.g., Beaufort, Chukchi, and Siberian seas (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 2009].

While the climate change signal is much clearer in the northern latitudes - where longer - term records show a relatively steady retreat of Arctic sea ice - evidence of global warming's impact around Antarctica is also showing up in the observations.

The full NAO record exhibits energetic inter-annual fluctuations (not shown), and consequently there is very little autocorrelation in any of the simulated time series, consistent with observations (Fig.

Because the GISS analysis combines available sea surface temperature records with meteorological station measurements, we test alternative choices for the ocean data, showing that global temperature change is sensitive to estimated temperature change in polar regions where observations are limited.

[Please note the model shows a lot of Amazon heating, but little (annual mean) Amazon drying — which does not correspond well with findings from the Pleistocene climate record or present - day (2005, 2010 droughts) observations.

There are at least 90 models that differ by a factor of more than 3 and almost all show much higher temps than have been recorded (see Spencer «95 % of climate models agree; the observations must be wrong»).

A 35 - year dust record established from Barbados surface dust and satellite observations from TOMS and the European geostationary meteorological satellite (Meteosat) show the importance of climate control and Sahel drought for interannual and decadal dust variability, with no overall trend yet documented (Chiapello et al., 2005).

I'm afraid all my efforts to match recorded observations to them only seem close to matching the very coldest 1990 predictions and I'd love to see a graph that can more clearly show me where I'm going wrong.

The Sedlacek and Knutti paper is only about oceanic temperatures, not the land record, it shows that the models do a poor job matching observed oceanic changes over the 20th century when relying only on natural forcing, and that if the natural - only runs are scaled to have an overall trend that matches the observations, the models predict a more heterogeneous distribution of trends than was observed.

Recent observations at the surface in the North Atlantic show record - high saltiness, Tung said, while at the same time, deeper water in the North Atlantic shows increasing amounts of heat.

These records have not been calibrated (though all show positive correlations with local temperature observations), but have been smoothed with a 20 - year filter and scaled to have zero mean and unit standard deviation over the period 800 — 1995.

The historical climate record and recent observations (as against fallible computer models) show that CO2 doesn't cause warming — game over for the AGW supporters, which means that the thousands on non-jobs that have been supporting this non event (hoax) need to go.

This recent shift towards more intense and frequent El Niños is related to the recent increase in dry areas around the world.5 However, past observations and reconstructions of El Niño events from non-instrumental records such as corals show that El Niño events naturally fluctuate in magnitude and frequency over time, and this has been demonstrated in long climate model simulations of past and future climate as well.6

Drawing from millions of wildlife observations on iNaturalist, Seek shows you lists of commonly - recorded insects, birds, plants, amphibians, and more in your area.

It's part of the observations they take, it's part of the discussions they have in reflective practice, it's part of what we record when we show parents children's learning.

You can snap photos at showings, record your spoken observations using your phone's microphone, or type a text memo and then add these files to the personal notes section of any property in RPR.