Sentences with phrase «refereed journal papers»

The effect was to let the public be deluded about such things, by those who hoped that the public would rise up and demand politicial action, while the climate scientists could comfortably sit back, let the wild claims appear to be part of their famously «settled» science, knowing that if the «predictions» failed, they could point to their refereed journal papers that made no such explicit claims, or at least none with claimed certainty, thus achieving sensational scare stories but with plausible deniability.

Refereed journal papers are the coin of the academic realm.

What I said just above and in post # 37 provide good reasons that science does not rely on the findings of a single refereed journal paper.

Not exact matches

To date, only two research papers in refereed academic journals have investigated the impact of confidentiality / no confidentiality on abortion or pregnancy rates.

The references list eight earlier papers by Snelling 2 in refereed journals (or symposium volumes) on aspects of uranium mineralisation; three as sole author and five as junior co-author.

Well, every creation «scientist» needs to gain scientific credibility by publishing papers in refereed scientific journals and books and the sort of nonsense Dr Snelling publishes in Creation Ex Nihilo is unlikely to be accepted in any credible scientific journal.

«I didn't even bother to submit my papers to journals because I had been so much harassed by the referees [of earlier papers],» she told New Scientist.

-LSB-[Italic part for written statement only, not to be read aloud]-RSB- I've published papers on climate change in Science, Nature, and other refereed journals; I am the author of a technical book on the subject.

As of December 31, 2002, data and images hoovered by the Hubble had given rise to 3,577 papers in refereed journals.

We have written drafts of three scientific papers that we plan to soon submit to refereed journals.

For example, the most widely recognized news peg for a science story is publication of the research in a refereed journal or delivery of a paper on the work at a major scientific meeting.

A recent Ph.D. as well as at least one first - author paper (in a refereed English - language journal) is required.

Similarly, any publication of material based upon or developed at NSO, other than scientific articles or papers published in refereed journals, must contain an acknowledgment of NSF support and disclaimer in the following terms:

All submitted papers will be refereed according to the usual high standards of the journal.

In addition to publishing more than 60 papers in refereed research journals Seth is heavily involved in science outreach.

Besides refereed papers, he edited 12 dedicated journal volumes and co-authored two outreach books.

He holds 2 patents; co-authored 3 books; edited 4 monographs; published 34 book chapters, over 550 SCI journal and 250 refereed conference papers.

Now the journal Nature Methods has finally responded to the controversy, publishing several critiques of the original study and officially retracting the paper after a review by four independent referees.

You will know this because it will feature in published papers in good quality refereed journals - don't be shy to ask for evidence that the FCoV test your lab is using really works.

It is shocking that this paper has been able to pass the journal's referee system.

He never published his papers breaking the rules of the Institute that solutions must be published in a refereed mathematics journal of worldwide repute.

At a meeting of the full board of the Journal of the American Mathematical Society, the board acknowledged the referee's extremely high praise but nevertheless rejected the paper for lack of «interaction with other areas of mathematics.»

He is a member of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) and the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and has published and presented over 110 papers in refereed journals and technical conferences.

According to Pimentel, dozens of scientific papers reporting on research from the Rodale Institute Farming Systems Trial have been published in prestigious refereed journals over the past 20 years.

We welcome the additional review of anonymous journal referees (and indeed, agree that this is still an important gateway to ensure that all papers have a minimum of reviews)-- but we feel that our work should be judged primarily on the statistical approach used and the transparency of our analysis — not on the fact that we have been published in a peer reviewed journal.

Certainly, the journals ask one to assess validity as best as one can and to find errors as well as one can but they certainly don't expect referees to determine definitively if the paper is error - free.

Also, Wagner does not say he is resigning because he disagrees with RS management practices regarding referee selection, he is saying he is resigning because of the publication of S&B, even though he can't point to any flaws in the process and he has not received any rebuttal papers and his own journal doesn't plan to retract the paper.

On the other hand, as I just explained to the Editor, after getting more familiar with Scafetta's activities in the blogosphere I have now revised my earlier suggestion and I do not think that a refereed journal would be the right place for the paper.

Leif Svalgaard says: October 28, 2012 at 5:42 pm «Regardless of who rejected the paper, there are almost always several referees, especially with high - quality journals.»

I am specifically proving that EEJ, a specific paper written by Jelbring and published in a journal (God help the referees, absent that day on vacation or something), violates the zeroth but especially the second law of thermodynamics when it asserts that there will be a thermal lapse rate in an adiabatically isolated column of ideal gas in thermal equilibrium in a gravitational field.

Towards the end of this «proof» site, he lists comments from some of the referees of journals that rejected his paper.

bothering to deal (this posting) with these cranks Steig et al... at least I published 27 statistical papers in refereed journals... its becoming a joke and not worth anymore of my time,.

«We have actual papers in refereed journals,» Cohen laughs.