Not exact matches
Commenting on the statement by the Secretary
of State for Education setting out proposals to
reform the
system of primary assessment, Chris Keates, General Secretary
of the NASUWT - The Teachers» Union, said: «It is important to recognise, and as the NASUWT has stated consistently, that many
of the concerns expressed about statutory primary assessment are the direct result
of their use in the current high stakes school
accountability regime.
The addressing
system, he said, is part
of the institutional
reforms by the government aimed at easing business registration and other
accountability and management purposes.
At noon, Citizens Union will unveil its position on a variety
of police oversight
reforms and urge New York City government officials to enact local laws that create a more cohesive
system of public oversight with enhanced
accountability to New Yorkers, City Hall steps, Manhattan.
However, once the proposed
reforms are published, I hope to see further changes to ensure better public interest
accountability and a visible improvement for all
of us who wish to see a thriving 21st century railway
system in our country.
Among other
reforms, he suggests that improving the representativeness
of MEPs by using open - list voting
systems, increasing the
accountability of the -LSB-...]
They want a tougher
system of accountability, and I think a
reformed electoral
system would help deliver that.»
But perhaps most substantially, there is a growing awareness in the world
of education
reform that the big battles over getting new teacher - evaluation laws passed or school
accountability systems implemented are not the end
of the story («The Teacher Evaluation Revamp, In Hindsight,» features, Spring 2017).
The question
of whether testing and
accountability systems are an effective
reform tool has seldom been the subject
of rigorous research.
In taking
accountability away from school
systems and placing it on individual schools and their employees,
reform calls into question the current
system of governance — and leaves no room for «excuses» such as weak family structures, poverty, discrimination, lack
of aptitude, peer pressure, diet, television, etc..
In choosing this year's «Better Balance,» for example, the editors signaled that something is awry in the existing balance between the «hard» elements
of standards - based
reform (namely the academic standards, assessments, and interventions that make up a state's
accountability system) and such «soft» components as teacher training, instructional materials, and classroom environment.
One interpretation
of the emphasis on developing the common core curriculum is that these debates provide a convenient diversion from potentially more intractable fights over bigger
reform ideas like using improved teacher evaluations for personnel decisions, expanded school choice, or enhanced
accountability systems.
Moreover, summative assessment sat at the core
of many
of the policy
reforms that the leaders described: additional
accountability levers such as teacher evaluation
systems and statewide school report cards draw on data coming out
of these summative tests to make determinations and comparisons regarding teacher and school - level performance.
For going on two decades now, the twin movements to expand parental choice and foster
accountability have been the major drivers
of reform in the K - 12 education
system.
Regardless
of the
reform strategy — whether new standards, or
accountability, or small schools, or parental choice, or teacher effectiveness — there is an underlying weakness in the U.S. education
system which has hampered every effort up to now: most consequential decisions are made by district and state leaders, yet these leaders lack the infrastructure to learn quickly what's working and what's not.
With the advent
of competitive
reforms such as merit pay, test - based
accountability, and market - based
systems like vouchers and charters, we are already seeing unintended consequences in the forms
of cheating, competition for scarce resources, and a
system of winners and losers.
Accountability systems have worked well with other
reforms — such as effective choice policies, the expansion
of early - childhood - education and other school - readiness programs, and efforts to improve the teaching force through evaluation and tenure
reform — to improve education for children around the country.
In addition, the report takes a hard look at the Adult Basic Education (ABE)
system at the state Department
of Education (DOE) and calls for a series
of reforms, new investments, and
accountability measures.
Even though
accountability is increasingly recognized as the linchpin
of education
reform, only a few states have made real progress in establishing
accountability systems.
Which was that we wanted to make a commitment not just to the
accountability side
of the
reforms, but also to what might be called the instructional core and to invest in capacity and the capacity
of people on the front lines
of the educational
systems; to give them better preparation, to give them better tools, to give them better professional development.
A unique blend
of education - savvy business leaders, a superintendent with stamina, and a mature
accountability system has made Houston into the darling
of urban school
reform.
She would undo most if not all
of the «structural»
reforms that have been put in place in recent years — mayoral control, performance - based pay, charter laws and other choice schemes, reliance on entrepreneurship and market incentives, federal efforts to incentivize and prod the
system to change in constructive directions, testing - and results - based
accountability and more.
Education policy in the United States has long been dominated by the notion that the way to
reform education is to set performance standards and establish a
system of accountability.
Even the 1994 federal Title I
reforms, which required states to develop the three major prongs
of an effective
accountability system (academic standards, tests linked to the standards, and a mixture
of assistance and sanctions for low - performing schools) did little to stimulate California into action.
This legislation replaced the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
system of school
accountability with a more narrowly tailored and flexible approach to school
reform.
In standards - based
reform, much
of the attention has been on states as the entities responsible for setting academic standards, developing testing
systems to measure the standards, and then putting
accountability systems in place based on those standards.
In my new book, The Death and Life
of the Great American School
System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education, I describe how I came to repudiate my support for choice and
accountability, though not for curriculum
reform, which I still believe is necessary and valuable.
Almost every state is now instituting
accountability systems to measure progress in standards - based
reform, and almost every such
system depends heavily on testing as an indicator
of student or school performance.
2015 promises to be a pivotal year for several major
reforms in public education, including the continuing rollout
of the Common Core State Standards, the state's new school financing and
accountability system, and the administration
of the online Smarter Balanced assessments.
-- The Seventy Four «Washington Post reporter Russakoff's fascinating study
of the struggle to
reform the Newark school
system reveals the inner workings
of a wide range
of systemic and grassroots problems (charter schools, testing,
accountability, private donors) plaguing education
reform today... Russakoff's eagle - eyed view
of the current state
of the public education
system in Newark and the United States is one
of the finest education surveys in recent memory.»
As the first large urban school district to introduce a comprehensive
accountability system, Chicago provides an exceptional case study
of the effects
of high - stakes testing - a
reform strategy that will become omnipresent as the No Child Left Behind Act is implemented nationwide.
Over the past decade, California has been a holdout from some
of the big national
reforms that most other states have embraced, especially clear and tough school
accountability systems and test - based teacher evaluations.
It goes something like this: Step away from federal heavy - handedness around states»
accountability and teacher credentialing
systems; keep plenty
of transparency
of results in place, especially test scores disaggregated by racial and other subgroups; offer incentives for embracing promising
reforms instead
of mandates; and give school districts a lot more flexibility to move their federal dollars around as they see fit.
Each State approved to use a differentiated
accountability model must agree to provide data to the Department comparing its model to its existing
accountability system, the impact
of the interventions applied to schools and districts, and the effects
of differentiating
accountability on student achievement and school
reform.
While the Mayor's most recent predecessor Mike Bloomberg, with Chancellor Joel Klein, used a two - pronged strategy, approaching
reform both from within the
system (doubling down on
accountability and giving principals more autonomy) and from without (rapidly expanding school choice through charter schools), de Blasio and his Chancellor Carmen Fariña, who share what Alexander Nazaryan calls an «out - sized antipathy» towards charters, are betting the whole ball
of wax on an inside job.
With the potential to
reform school finance, a new academic
accountability system, and the expiration
of Classroom Site Fund monies on the horizon, advocacy is more important now than ever.
Callen: Poll shows Mississippians want school choice Grant Callen, Guest Columnist, January 10, 2016 Over the past four years, our state Legislature has adopted a handful
of key
reforms designed to strengthen our education
system by providing students with new education options and taxpayers with more
accountability and transparency.
Formative
reform: purposeful planning for the next generation
of assessment and
accountability systems.
Importantly, these are the skills that standardized tests are least effective in assessing, rendering our state
accountability system outdated and in need
of substantial
reform.
As you would expect, fair weather
accountability hawks within the school
reform movement such as Mike Petrilli
of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute criticize Education Trust for clearly pointing out once again that these
systems — including the A-to-F grading approach used in the Sunshine State — are concealing the failures
of schools and districts to address achievement gaps.
Even before Ed Trust issued its latest report, there have been plenty
of concern (especially from the civil rights wing
of the school
reform movement) about the displacement
of AYP with new
accountability systems.
He served as CEO and Superintendent
of the Chicago Public Schools
system, initiating sweeping
reforms, including online assessments
of all students, new
accountability measures, and a first -
of - its - kind student safety plan.
This is part
of government
reforms designed to make the exams and
accountability system more rigorous.
FairTest supports the authentic
accountability plan proposed by the Coalition for Authentic
Reform in Education (CARE) proposed a comprehensive
accountability system that uses a balance
of local and state assessments to describe school improvement and student progress.
So why then do they not act more decisively to
reform the
accountability system, lessen its grip on the confidence
of school leaders, and aim to encourage good practice rather than to stimulate insecurity?
In 1999, David Driscoll was named Massachusetts Commissioner
of Education, where he has overseen the implementation
of the MCAS high school exit exam, the school and district
accountability system, the educator certification test, and significant
reforms to special education.
On the California Office
of Reform Education (CORE) school
accountability system, which was released this year, Grape Street scored a 30 out
of 100, while the average score at LA Unified was 60.
The Texas Legislature should tie to a new school finance
system that meets the needs
of equity and adequacy bold, comprehensive
reform legislation to take Texas to the next level
of accountability.
However, having made these uncontroversial statements she then states that we need to «test» that pupils have mastered the basics and then links this to
reform of the
accountability system.
It is long past time to move to the next level
of reform and
accountability — the extrinsic type — and this is the trend we must and will see over the next several decades in what I believe will be the civil rights revolution
of the 21st century, which I think will play out simultaneously on the two tracks I have just mentioned: the delivery
system for education and the means by which we prepare and compensate educators, primarily teachers.
Grant Callen, Clarion Ledger Guest Columnist, January 10, 2016 Over the past four years, our state Legislature has adopted a handful
of key
reforms designed to strengthen our education
system by providing students with new education options and taxpayers with more
accountability and transparency.