Sentences with phrase «refute global warming claims»

For example, I have never argued that the satellite record somehow refutes global warming claims, nor supported the «urban heat island» arguments, nor any of a number of other dubious claims from the sceptics.

Not exact matches

Or the claim that marine phytoplankton had declined by 40 % since 1950 due to global warming and ocean «acidification» headlined globally, and utterly refuted by observations..

James Taylor of the Heartland Institute penned a Forbes article where he claimed that Christy's findings «refute frequent assertions by global warming alarmists that global warming is adversely affecting Sierra Nevada snowfall and snowpack.»

The report by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) claims to refute prior studies showing the rate of global warming had flattened in recent decades.

However, claims based on «eyeballing» and similar offered here in the thread by Mr. Coal - Magazine Editor, who is probably going to write his PhD thesis soon where he refutes global warming using «eyeballing», and by other «skeptics» are not a scientifically valid approach to provide evidence for the assertion of the «stopped» global warming.

The latest attack on global warming consensus comes from Dennis Avery and Fred Singer who claim to have found 500 peer reviewed papers refuting that the last few decades of global warming are primarily anthropogenic.

Of the few studies that do claim to refute man - made global warming, these repeat well debunked myths.

You're making the claim that the global temperature anomaly data support «global cooling» and incontrovertably refute warming, and have provided the charts without explanation - so let's hear it.

That is how global warming advocates counted polar bears to refute the claims of the Inuit.

Here you go, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/06/010615071248.htm is just one published (and refuted) claim of the end of global warming made in 2001 covering a prediction of CO2 levels.

Peiser has long opposed mainstream science's conclusions about anthropogenic global warming; in 2005 Peiser said he had data which refuted an article published in Science Magazine, claiming 100 % of peer - reviewed research papers on climate change agreed with the scientific consensus of global warming.

The study refutes a claim that the planet's mean surface - temperature increases began to slow down in 1998, commonly referred to as a global warming «hiatus» phenomenon.

And of course even the refuted points sneak back in with the claim that «the broader culture» is being convinced by them, which means people disagree about global warming, which somehow means that there's some sort of problem with the science.