Sentences with phrase «remove defamatory»

She distinguished the decision in Trkulja from hers in Bleyer on the grounds that the former was based on Urbanchich v Drummoyne Municipal Council, which concerned the liability of the Urban Transit Authority in failing to remove defamatory posters placed on its bus shelters after receiving notice of the plaintiff's complaint.

the appellants had refused, despite request therefor, to remove the defamatory statements from their website until approximately nine months after being served with the respondent's first notice of libel and seven months after the delivery of his statement of claim;

Finally, Justice Matheson ordered that Levant remove the defamatory content from his blog within 15 days, including a proposed plan where only part of the content would be removed.

Crookes contends, for instance, that Geist refused his request to remove a defamatory comment from his own site.

I previously covered the Vigna v. Levant decision, where Ezra Levant was ordered to remove defamatory blog posts against Giacamo Vigna.

Not exact matches

How to Take Advantage of Online Review and Answer Sites: Removing False Information Responding to constructive criticism is one thing, you can take it into account to improve customer satisfaction and your business in general, but what if there's false, defamatory information about your company floating around in the ether?

Google has said it is considering its options and that it already removes links to defamatory online articles, fulfiling its legal obligations to French citizens.

In the email, a copy of which is posted on the publication's website, Mr. Harder listed several statements he claimed were defamatory and demanded that the publication «immediately and permanently remove each of these statements from the story, and print a full and complete retraction and apology, with as prominent placement as the original story.»

Although we do not pre-screen comments, we reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request.

It is prohibited to send any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, indecent, offensive, inciting, pornographic or blasphemous material or any other material that could give rise to liability under civil or criminal law to or from these websites or to publish it on them and UTZ reserves the right to remove any such content without prior warning or notification.

You specifically acknowledge that the California Avocado Commission is not liable for your defamatory, offensive, infringing or illegal materials or conduct, or that of third parties, and the California Avocado Commission reserves the right to remove such materials from the California Avocado Commission Web site without liability.

Any content that is considered potentially libelous, defamatory or in potential breach of copyright will be removed.

We or our hosted bloggers may remove comments that are determined to be unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene or otherwise objectionable, or that violate any party's intellectual property or our Terms of Use.

However, Perfect Supplements, LLC reserves the right to block or remove communications or materials that it determines to be (a) abusive, defamatory, or obscene, (b) fraudulent, deceptive, or misleading, (c) in violation of a copyright, trademark or; other intellectual property right of another or (d) offensive or otherwise unacceptable to Perfect Supplements, LLC in its sole discretion.

(b) ELITESINGLES reserves the right to block or remove from its site any offensive or incorrect communication or information, and / or any communication or information brought to its attention which it reasonably suspects infringes any applicable laws, regulations or third party rights (such as material that is obscene, indecent, pornographic, seditious, offensive, defamatory, threatening, liable to incite racial hatred, menacing, blasphemous or in breach of any third party intellectual property rights) but ELITESINGLES has no obligation to review any communication or information provided by members for inclusion on the website.

We may, but have no obligation to, monitor, edit or remove content that we determine in our sole discretion are unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, pornographic, obscene or otherwise objectionable or violates any party's intellectual property or these Terms of Service.

d. Mexicandatingo.com will remove all profiles that have illegal content that promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual; harasses or advocates harassment of another person; involves the transmission of «junk mail», «chain letters», or unsolicited mass mailing or «spamming»; promotes information that is false, misleading, threatening, obscene, defamatory or libelous.

d. ChristianDatingF.com will remove all profiles that have illegal content that promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual; harasses or advocates harassment of another person; involves the transmission of «junk mail», «chain letters», or unsolicited mass mailing or «spamming»; promotes information that is false, misleading, threatening, obscene, defamatory or libelous.

d. aFreeDating.com will remove all profiles that have illegal content that promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual; harasses or advocates harassment of another person; involves the transmission of «junk mail», «chain letters», or unsolicited mass mailing or «spamming»; promotes information that is false, misleading, threatening, obscene, defamatory or libelous.

25dates.com has the right to remove someone from an event if this person acts in a way that 25dates.com deems defamatory, obscene, inflammatory, indecent, or threatening in any way.

d. Ukcupiddating.com will remove all profiles that have illegal content that promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual; harasses or advocates harassment of another person; involves the transmission of «junk mail», «chain letters», or unsolicited mass mailing or «spamming»; promotes information that is false, misleading, threatening, obscene, defamatory or libelous.

We reserve the right to remove any comment we deem to be defamatory, rude, insulting to others, hateful, off - topic or reckless to the community.

Education Pioneers does not discriminate against any views but reserves the right to remove or not post comments that are off - topic or contain obscene language, threats, or defamatory statements.

We may, at our sole discretion remove Contributed Materials that we determine are unlawful, fraudulent, harassing, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene or otherwise objectionable, or believe infringes or violates any party's intellectual property or other proprietary rights or our Notices and Policies.

Although we do not pre-screen comments, we reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request.

May link to, but not replicate, content contained in the www.fifthavenuevetclinic.ca; Must not create a border environment or browser around content contained in the www.fifthavenuevetclinic.ca; Must not present misleading or false information about the www.fifthavenuevetclinic.ca services or products; Must not misrepresent www.fifthavenuevetclinic.ca's relationship with the linker; Must not imply that Fifth Avenue Veterinary Clinic is endorsing or sponsoring the linker or the linker's services or products; Must not use the www.fifthavenuevetclinic.ca's logos or trade dress without prior written permission from Fifth Avenue Veterinary Clinic; Must not contain content that could be construed as obscene, libelous, defamatory, pornographic, or inappropriate for all ages; Must not contain materials that would violate any laws; Must agree that the link may be removed at any time upon Fifth Avenue Veterinary Clinic» request pursuant to Fifth Avenue Veterinary Clinic's reserved rights to rescind its consent to allow the link.

You are encouraged to report untrue, inaccurate, defamatory, illegal, infringing and / or harmful content available on this website to TravelGround.com and we shall use our reasonable endeavours to correct and / or remove such content, or any part thereof, if you provide reasonable grounds to prove the alleged nature of such content.

You specifically acknowledge that neither Star Alliance nor Star Alliance Members are liable for your defamatory, offensive, infringing or illegal materials or conduct, or that of third parties, and Star Alliance reserves the right to remove such materials from the Star Alliance Website without liability or notice.

Identification of the material that is claimed to be infringing, to be the subject of infringing activity, or that is claimed to be defamatory and that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit us to locate the material.

However, a moderator removing your non-topical, dishonest, defamatory statements from the comments section of a blog is no more «censorship» than removing penis enlargement spam from the comments section would be.

«We are creating a legal defense fund to support litigation, starting immediately, to demand that false and defamatory material be removed from blogs and Web sites and publications, and that the true criminals in this case be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.»

[edit — defamatory and vague accusations removed] will not convince anyone anymore.

If you have knowledge that your users are posting infringing or defamatory material to your site, best practices may include removing that material.

Avvo and JD Supra's terms of service, for example, prohibit the posting of defamatory or harassing material but I didn't see anything that suggests you can otherwise get a negative review removed from either site.

It is interesting that similar cases keep coming before the courts and responsibility for removing keeps going up the chain to the ISP, platform or server owner rather than the actual writer of the alleged defamatory statement.

«Indeed, the lawsuits seek to hold accountable sites and services that host the articles, feature comments about the articles, include hyperlinks to the articles, fail to actively monitor their content to ensure that allegedly defamatory articles are not reposted after being removed, and even those that implement the domain name registrations of sites that host the articles.»

Hudson says that, providing websites and ISPs act in a timely manner to remove of fending content when alerted, the liability for any false allegations will fall squarely on the individual: «Sites that do not routinely edit or moderate content have a degree of protection under the Defamation Act 1996 and the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002, if they did not know and had no reason to believe they were publishing defamatory allegations or private information.»

If the statements are defamatory, call me now to find out how to get them removed; operators are standing by.

When reporting to Google, a business or its legal counsel should demand that the review be removed immediately, and put Google on formal notice of the false and defamatory statements.

This, however, will not likely be the case where Google has notice of the false and defamatory statements and fails to remove them within a reasonable time.

The reviewer might volunteer to remove the false and defamatory review and the matter may end.

Taking the position that it merely hosts third - party content and is not a creator or moderator of that content, Google may be unco - operative in removing false and defamatory reviews.

There is a strong argument, on established principles, that Google will be liable as a publisher of its business reviews where it has received notification of the false and defamatory reviews and has failed to remove them within a reasonable amount of time (see Pritchard v. Van Nes 2016 BCSC 686).

Our internet defamation group has extensive experience protecting and repairing the reputations of businesses and professional, identifying anonymous posters and removing false and defamatory content from the internet.

The defendant knew that her Facebook page contained defamatory statements posted by her friends, and she did nothing to stop or remove them although she could have.

The plaintiff objected to the comment as being defamatory and requested that the defendant Fourniers remove it from FreeDominion, which the Fourniers refused to do.

He noted that the public conversation nature of the online dialogue between the blogs and the «removing the sting» were only additional factors on which to conclude the posts were not defamatory.

Google had been refusing to remove the allegedly defamatory material from its search engine results despite his requests, through a notice of application served to the company on Oct. 6 and followed by Niemela's personal requests via e-mail on Oct. 27 and 31.

In cases where authors of defamatory comments repost the same or substantially similar comments after they have been removed twice before from the site, website operators would be obliged to remove the comments within 48 hours of receiving a notice of complaint.

More specifically, he demanded that Google remove or prevent defamatory words from appearing or reappearing in any current or future Google searches.