Sentences with phrase «representatives of the defendant»

Representatives of the defendant will encourage victims to sign release waivers signing away their right to pursue a settlement.

[26] This lack of authority can not be used as an excuse that prohibits the proper conduct of court actions at trial management conferences, when it is such a representation that allows the representative of the defendant to attend in the first place.

If this happens, then the Claimant can return to the court to ask for a Penal Notice i.e. as a specific court order has been breached, then a representative of the Defendant risks prison.

5 It may be of some importance to point out that by an order made May 14, 1986 the defendant was ordered to make inquiries of General Motors Corporation with respect to certain answers referred to by the representative of the defendant on his examination for discovery.

4 In the transcript of the examination for discovery of a representative of the defendant it is acknowledged that General Motors of Canada is a corporation intimately related (sic) to General Motors Corporation, an American corporation.

This typically begins with a call from a representative of the defendant's insurance company.

However, the issue has been somewhat muddied by Lupsor Estate v. Middlesex Mutual Insurance Co., [2003] O.J. No. 1038, in which the defendant was sued both as an insurer of the plaintiff and as a proposed representative of the defendant class.

Verbeek was an investment advisor and, at some relevant times, a registered representative of the defendant Dundee Securities Corporation («Dundee»).

Not exact matches

Yieldify denies this, countering that «in March 2013, Mr. Jay Radia, Defendant's Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Meelan Radia, Defendant's Chief Technical Officer, met with representatives of Plaintiff.

The plaintiff is seeking: A declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation of the provisions of the 1992 Constitution, particularly Articles 88 (5), 218 (a) and (e), 284 and 287 thereof, the 1st defendant can not act as the legal representative for Honourable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta, the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Ghana, in a pending investigation bordering on conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant; A further declaration that the purported response filed by the 1st Defendant on behalf of the said Honorable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect of the petition concerning conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect whdefendant can not act as the legal representative for Honourable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta, the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Ghana, in a pending investigation bordering on conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant; A further declaration that the purported response filed by the 1st Defendant on behalf of the said Honorable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect of the petition concerning conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect whDefendant; A further declaration that the purported response filed by the 1st Defendant on behalf of the said Honorable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect of the petition concerning conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect whDefendant on behalf of the said Honorable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect of the petition concerning conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect whDefendant is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect whatsoever;

Counsel for the defendants on record — the House of Representatives and the Speaker, Mr. Yakubu Dogara — Mr. Kalu Onuoha, aligned with Kareem's position.

The indictment today charges that Bruno «routinely met with various individuals and representatives of groups who asked that defendant Joseph L. Bruno take action benefitting their interests regarding legislative, funding, contract, and regulatory issues pending before the New York State Legislature.»

The judgment read in part, «The crucial question that follows is this: when the 1st defendant (House of Representatives) sent the letter of 20/3/2002 to the Plaintiff (el - Rufai) to appear before its Ethics and Privileges Committee, was it engaged in the making of a law within its legislative competence or to expose corruption and inefficiency in a public department?

Castorina argues that the plaintiffs and others are «being denied their right to vote for a representative in the vacant 11th Congressional District in New York due to the failure of defendant to comply with mandatory provisions of Article I, Section II, Clause IV of the United States Constitution and the New York Public Officers Law Section 42 [3],» according to court documents.

The initial resolution called for extending the program for another year at a local cost of $ 21,000 to be given to the District Attorney's office so a representative could appear during a defendant's arraignment proceeding.

In the Originating Summons marked FHC / ABJ / CS / 232/2018, the plaintiff 8 issues for determination by the court, including: Having regards to the combined provisions of sections 79,116,118,132,153,160 (1) and 178 of the 1999 constitution as amended, the constitution read together with paragraph 15 (a) of the third schedule to the same constitution, whether the 3rd defendant (Independent National Electoral Commission) is not the only institution or body constitutionally vested with the powers and vires to organized, undertake and supervised elections to the offices of the president, the vice president of the federal republic of Nigeria, the Governor and deputy governor of a state, the membership of the Senate, the House of Representatives and the House of Assembly of each state of the federation, including fixing the sequence and dates of the elections to the said offices?

B. Upon the written request of an authorized representative of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, Settling Defendants shall submit written reports or respond to written interrogatories, under oath if requested, relating to any of the matters contained in this Final Judgment as may be requested.

A. For purposes of determining or securing compliance with this Final Judgment, or of determining whether the Final Judgment should be modified or vacated, and subject to any legally recognized privilege, from time to time duly authorized representatives of the Department of Justice, including consultants and other persons retained by the Department of Justice, shall, upon written request of an authorized representative of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, and on reasonable notice to Settling Defendants, be permitted:

Alsup ordered the other defendants in the suit — BP PLC, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell PLC, all of which had representatives at the hearing — to submit briefs within two weeks detailing any points of disagreement with Chevron.

Oil companies and their representative trade associations are defendants in our constitutional climate case against the federal government pending in the District of Oregon.

The defendant had Joseph Hickey, a UofO Master's student in physics and graduate student representative of the UofO Senate, attend the cross-examination.

George et al. v. Newfoundland and Labrador 2013 NLTD (G) 170 Evidence — Opinion evidence — Expert evidence — General — When expert evidence required The representative plaintiffs commenced this class action on January 5, 2011, for damages in respect of personal injuries as a result of moose - vehicle collisions in Newfoundland and Labrador (the defendant).

While the number of depositions will vary from case to case, depositions are often taken from the defendant, any witnesses to the accident, friends and family members who are familiar with your injuries, representatives from the defendant's insurance company and your own doctors and health care providers.

1) Affidavit of Documents to be completed by April 15th, 2002; 2) Examinations for Discovery of the Defendants shall be for two weeks commencing June 18th to June28th, 2002; 3) Examinations for Discovery of the representative Plaintiffs shall be held during the month of July 2002.

There are over 60,000 legal practitioners employed in this sector and despite what the media say about the UK having a so - called «compensation culture», to process claims even of low value still requires skill by both by the Claimant's and the Defendant's representatives.

It is possible to obtain injunctions which can be enforced against named and unnamed groups by careful use of the representative defendant mechanism provided for by CPR 19.6.

In such cases a representative defendant is named as the party defending the case on behalf of the class.

No, under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 section 31 (2) class members, other than a representative plaintiff / representative defendant, are not liable for costs except with respect to the determination of their own individual claims.

When the court gives permission for a personal claim, brought by a beneficiary of an estate in his personal capacity, to be continued as a derivative claim, the personal representative needs to be joined as a defendant.

When different persons combine their lawsuits because the facts and the defendant are so similar and where a single litigant's case is heard by the court as representative of all (together, called a «class»).

For an individual who has a simple civil complaint it's possible that he or she will never see the inside of a court room while often criminal cases will always require at least some time spent in a court room with a representative from a Toronto criminal law firm who will assist in making declarations of guilt or innocence with the defendant.

The defense will want to know if there were any statements made at the time of the accident where their agents or representatives gave «admissions against interest» — in other words, said things that admitted the defendant is to blame for what happened.

In spring 2016, Kelly Nash and Kimberly Baum successfully obtained a TRO and Preliminary Injunction in Utah's Third District Court for a large insurance / finance company precluding Defendants from raiding its marketing representatives throughout the US, which has caused in excess of a million in lost sales to the client.

The plaintiff in the case of Maree v. Willow Park Health Care Center is the personal representative of the estate of a woman who died while she was a patient at a long - term nursing facility operated by the defendants.

120 (1) If a defendant makes a payment to a plaintiff who is or alleges to be entitled to recover from the defendant, the payment constitutes, to the extent of the payment, a release by the plaintiff or the plaintiff's personal representative of any claim that the plaintiff or the plaintiff's personal representative or any person claiming through or under the plaintiff or by virtue of Part V of the Family Law Act may have against the defendant.

(2) Nothing in this section precludes the defendant making the payment from demanding, as a condition precedent to such payment, a release from the plaintiff or the plaintiff's personal representative or any other person to the extent of such payment.

In the lawsuit, the personal representative stands in the shoes of the decedent and asserts a negligence claim against the defendant.

In a wrongful death suit, the representative of the deceased may also bring a claim on behalf of the estate of the deceased for conscious pain and suffering sustained as a result of the defendant's conduct.

Relying on Lex Machina's data, the GAO's analysis of a representative sample of 500 lawsuits from 2007 to 2011 concluded that the number of overall defendants in patent infringement lawsuits increased by about 129 percent over this period.

Court Mandated Alternative Dispute Resolution - In Vermont federal courts, after an opportunity for limited discovery, the parties, their lawyers, and representatives from insurance companies covering the defendant must meet with a neutral evaluator who is knowledgeable in the subject matter of the litigation to discuss all aspects of the case.

Key draftsperson for submissions addressing purported class representative's motion for conditional certification in case involving FLSA allegations in connection with representation of defendant.

It will be chaired by a neutral party who will be a member of the CJC, and will be made up of representatives from all sides of the debate, including claimants, defendants, general practitioners and representatives from NHS Resolution.

The Plaintiff, in a matter before a district court, sought to tender in evidence a recording of a telephone conversation he had had with the representative of the Third Defendant, a Superintendent Minister.

In addition, GAO's detailed analysis of a representative sample of 500 lawsuits from 2007 to 2011 shows that the number of overall defendants in patent infringement lawsuits increased by about 129 percent over this period.

Following this philosophy, I have found I am equally instructed by Claimant and Defendant representatives year on year and have followed cases through to post litigation as a Case Manager where individuals have undertaken independent activities of daily living, returned to work and run their own homes.

Only qualified legal representatives are eligible to receive the new fixed costs but litigants in person can use the system if they so wish; Motor Insurers» Bureau (MIB) untraceable claims, claims where the claimant or defendant is deceased, bankrupt or protected parties (other than children) will be excluded from the process on the grounds of complexity; Rehabilitation will still comprise a fundamental part of the new process; Claims valuation will not be undertaken by a computerised damages assessment tool as originally mooted.

Issues: Did the motion judge err by making a representation order authorizing the individual defendants to defend the proceeding as representatives of all the members of Local 773 after the expiry of the limitation period?

Rather than sue each defendant individually, they proceed against a single defendant who is considered representative of the much larger class.

Although Justice Roland Haines recognized that there must be a representative plaintiff with a claim against each named defendant, he was not satisfied in the context of a Rule 21 motion that a plaintiff must have a cause of action against each member of a putative defendant class.

In many such cases, the frames would not necessarily generate opposite answers; this is seen in an earlier post about jury selection cases, where the right of a juror to be seated correlates with the right of the defendant to a representative jury.