Not exact matches
Acted for the administrators of an estate in relation to a dispute concerning ownership of a company's shares, including defending a summary judgment application involving questions of
res judicata from previous decisions in parallel foreign proceedings.
The words «without prejudice» in their general adaptation, when used in a decree, mean that there
is no decision of the controversy on its merits, and leaves the whole subject in litigation as much open to another suit as if no suit had ever
been brought... When the words «without prejudice» appear in an order or decree, it shows that the judicial
act done
is not intended to
be res judicata of the merits of the controversy.
Keywords: Application for Security for Costs;
Res judicata; Section 24 (1) of the Court of Appeal
Act, RSBC 1996, c 77
● an equal pay claimant can claim under more than one of the heads of liability in the Equal Pay
Act 1970,
s 1 (2) in respect of the same period, without running foul of the doctrine of
res judicata; and
Ratio Decidendi Ratio Legis Real Property Recapture of Alimony Recidivism Reciprocity Reconciliation Recrimination Recusal Rehabilitative Spousal Support Rejoinder Relief Remand Remedial Statute Removal of Minor Child Request for Admissions Request for Production of Documents Request for Inspection Residence Residency
Res Judicata Respondent Restraining Order Restraining Statute Retainer: Retainer Agreement Rules of Civil Procedure Rules of Evidence RURESA (Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support
Act)
380 DOS 03 Donati v. DOS — prior misconduct; reconsideration;
res judicata; applicant's prior license as a real estate broker
was suspended by administrative decision (50 DOS 94) requiring respondent to pay restitution as a condition of consideration of any application by the applicant for a license under Article 12 - A; prior administrative decision
is binding both upon the applicant and the tribunal; tribunal must consider, however, whether under current circumstances, the continued imposition of the condition
is unreasonable; applicant
is 62 years of age, has
been divested of all property, faces destitution and seeks to work as a salesperson under the direction and supervision of a broker; applicant admits the unlawful
acts, expresses remorse and states that under the current circumstances, the prior decision
is a «life sentence;» under the current circumstances, the continued imposition of the prior decision
is unreasonable; application for real estate salesperson license granted