Ethics approval was obtained from the Royal Veterinary College Clinical
Research Ethical Review Board (CRERB)(reference number 2015/1369).
Ethics approval was granted by the Royal Veterinary College Clinical
Research Ethical Review Board (CRERB)(reference number URN 2015 1369).
Not exact matches
Researchers must also receive approval from their home institutions» institutional
review boards, groups that ensure investigators will guard patients» confidentiality and adhere to
ethical research principles.
Such a proposal would never come within a 100 - mile radius of the institutional
review boards that examine
ethical issues related to
research studies.
The new rules state that stem cells can be used if they are part of a study approved by the federal government, or if the protocol has been approved by an Institutional
Review Board (IRB) that provides ethical review for research involving human volun
Review Board (IRB) that provides
ethical review for research involving human volun
review for
research involving human volunteers.
The
research in the current study is fully compliant with recommendations made in that document, and adheres closely to guidelines established by OHSU's Institutional
Review Board and additional ad - hoc committees set up for scientific and ethical r
Review Board and additional ad - hoc committees set up for scientific and
ethical reviewreview.
A pregnancy - specific
ethical framework is needed to guide investigators and Institutional
Review Boards (
research ethics committees).
This study was approved the by the University of California, San Diego Institutional
Review Board (IRB Project 140072) and conformed to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki:
Ethical Principles for Medical
Research Involving Human Subjects (54).
Yesterday, the country's government submitted a formal vaccine trial protocol, developed with Epicentre, the Paris - based
research arm of Doctors Without Borders (MSF), to an
ethical review board.
An investigation related to this
research has been conducted by the Expert Group for Misconduct in Research at the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board on behalf of Karolinska Ins
research has been conducted by the Expert Group for Misconduct in
Research at the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board on behalf of Karolinska Ins
Research at the Swedish Central
Ethical Review Board on behalf of Karolinska Institutet.
The study was approved by the Yale Institutional
Review Boards for
ethical research (Human Research Protection Program) and participants signed a consent form with the sampling company (SSI) through which they chose to part
research (Human
Research Protection Program) and participants signed a consent form with the sampling company (SSI) through which they chose to part
Research Protection Program) and participants signed a consent form with the sampling company (SSI) through which they chose to participate.
In 2016, the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences recommended the creation of
ethical review boards for informatics
research at universities in the Netherlands, based on experience gained in the field of medicine.
Procedures were followed in accordance with the
ethical standards of the institutional
research subject
review boards and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1983.
The Regional Ethics
Review Board located in Gothenburg gave approval for this study (Dnr: 527 — 08) and the WHO
ethical and safety recommendations for
research on domestic violence against women as applicable to a postal survey were followed.28 For example, a letter was sent to prospective respondents in advance to inform them about the upcoming survey; this provided them with the opportunity to decline the survey before receiving it.