Results Multilevel modeling showed metabolic control deteriorated with age.
comorbidities [2], it is not surprising that they are at high
Results Multilevel modeling of data from 158 couples risk for experiencing psychological
Not exact matches
To estimate the proportion of each racial disparity attributable to within - plan differences and to determine the correlation between the outcome measure
results and racial disparities in the
results, we fitted
multilevel linear regression
models predicting the
result of each HEDIS indicator.
Finally, we describe the
results of our
multilevel probit
models, which considered each brief's raw readability score without regard to the opposing brief's readability.
The
results of the
multilevel modeling revealed mixed support for our predictions.
In support of these
results,
multilevel modeling of the outcomes revealed the predicted time × condition interaction for the primary outcome of clinician - rated PTSD symptom severity (t37.5 = − 3.09; P =.004) and for patient - reported relationship satisfaction (t68.5 = 2.00; P =.049).
Combining all of our explanatory indicators, Table 4 shows the
results of five
multilevel models.
In sum, given the
results from our simulation study and the empirical applications, we conclude that the
multilevel TAR
model is a valuable addition to the available techniques for analyzing intensive longitudinal data.
Based on the
results of our simulations, we can conclude that Bayesian estimation of the
multilevel TAR
model is feasible for the sample sizes under consideration, and yields accurate estimates of the average inertias and threshold.
The
results of
multilevel regression
models fail to support these hypotheses; adolescents who reside in single - parent or stepparent families are at heightened risk of drug use irrespective of community context.
Van den Noortgate and Onghena (2003) compared
multilevel meta - analysis with traditional meta - analytic methods and concluded that maximum likelihood
multilevel approach is in general superior to the fixed - effects approaches and that the
results of the
multilevel approach are not substantially different from the
results of the traditional random - effects approaches for intercept only
models.
Table 2 presents
results from the
multilevel models with functional limitations, disability, and self - rated health as outcomes.
To deal with dependency of study
results, we used a
multilevel random effects
model for the calculation of combined effect sizes and moderator - analyses (Hox 2002; Van den Noortgate and Onghena 2003).
A
multilevel random effects
model accounts for the hierarchical structure of the data, in which the effect sizes or study
results (the lowest level) are nested within studies (the highest level).