Would rather splash # 50M on
Reus than Sterling.
Not exact matches
SEE ALSO: Schweinsteiger Man Utd: Five signings who'd be better
than PAST - IT Bayern ace, including # 37m Liverpool target Liverpool transfers: Reds to sign
Reus in # 93.5 m triple swoop, moves funded by
Sterling sale & two others Manchester United news
We've got Wilshire and Theo, we don't need
Sterling when we are Ox & Gnabry waiting in the wings.m for
Sterling level of money we should go balls out after
Reus who's much more finished product
than Sterling and he's more consistent.
so a first choice defence of bellerin gab kos and darmien with kondogbia in DM position would give forward players real confidence... debouchey, chambers mert monreal as backup... and then a quality attacking option
reus sterling pedro lacazette whatever... all better
than walcott...... thats 3 in and half a dozen out... shouldnt be a big deal..
The bizzare and shocking truth is that in the current market
Reus is likely to be substantially cheaper
than Sterling.
But Pedro / Fekir / Draxler / Payet /
Sterling /
Reus / Muller / Lacazette / Ayew / Dybala are of differing qualities that could easily provide more
than Theo....
I'm not convinced any aside from
Sterling and
Reus could come in and provide the ammunition immediately to help a title challenge next season, but both of them are more expensive
than Pedro.
Only player of those you mentioned that's currently better
than Sterling is
Reus (by some distance).
That player you are asking for should be bought initially with the 42m we wasted it to bench our best player two season ago (Cazorla) Anyway, I agree we need someone who can change games and I would be more
than happy to sign:
Reus, Gotze, or Cavani even
Sterling, Kane, or Benteke, they might mot be at Sanchez class but definitely an improvement