Sentences with phrase «reversed trial court judgment»

Court reversed trial court judgment in favor of plaintiffs, holding that defendants could not be held liable for conspiring to interfere with contractual relations because they were a party to the contract.

Not exact matches

As a result, the court reversed the $ 2 million judgment and remanded the case back to the trial court for entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of our client.

The Rhode Island Supreme Court recently reversed a lower court's decision to grant the plaintiffs a new trial in a negligence and premises liability lawsuit, and instead instructed the court to enter judgment in favor of the defendant as a matter ofCourt recently reversed a lower court's decision to grant the plaintiffs a new trial in a negligence and premises liability lawsuit, and instead instructed the court to enter judgment in favor of the defendant as a matter ofcourt's decision to grant the plaintiffs a new trial in a negligence and premises liability lawsuit, and instead instructed the court to enter judgment in favor of the defendant as a matter ofcourt to enter judgment in favor of the defendant as a matter of law.

Trial court verdicts or judgments that found for plaintiffs were reversed or modified on appeal at higher rates compared with trial court outcomes favoring defendants (42 percent versus 21 percTrial court verdicts or judgments that found for plaintiffs were reversed or modified on appeal at higher rates compared with trial court outcomes favoring defendants (42 percent versus 21 perctrial court outcomes favoring defendants (42 percent versus 21 percent).

Because the Arizona Supreme Court could not say as a matter of law that the alleged negligence that was a cause of Shaw's death was unrelated to her incapacity, the state Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the trial judge and sent the case back for further proceedings.

When the state sought summary judgment on sovereign immunity grounds, the trial court granted it, but the appellate court reversed.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the company, and the court of appeals then reversed the decision.

The Indiana Court of Appeals recently reversed a trial court summary judgment favoring the defendant in a claim that originated as a premises liability lawsuit stemming from a trip - and - fall that seriously injured an 85 - year - old wCourt of Appeals recently reversed a trial court summary judgment favoring the defendant in a claim that originated as a premises liability lawsuit stemming from a trip - and - fall that seriously injured an 85 - year - old wcourt summary judgment favoring the defendant in a claim that originated as a premises liability lawsuit stemming from a trip - and - fall that seriously injured an 85 - year - old woman.

The North Carolina Court of Appeals unanimously reversed the trial court's denial of the judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of theCourt of Appeals unanimously reversed the trial court's denial of the judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of thecourt's denial of the judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of the D...

It, therefore, reversed the trial court's judgment, and remanded the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.

Special Properties v Woodruff 273 Mich App 586; 730 NW2d 753 (2007)(reversing trial court decision granting summary disposition to plaintiff and remanding for entry of judgment in favor of defendant on quiet title action)

If a Georgia appellate court holds that a lawyer, judge or jury made an error during the trial, or that a judge made an error in deciding a motion for summary judgment, the appellate court can reverse the trial court's decision or order a new trial.

The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and awarded a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, vacating a large verdict against Kim's client, a mutual insurance company, on the basis that the insurer's conduct in handling a fire damage claim did not constitute bad faith as a matter ofCourt reversed the ruling of the trial court and awarded a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, vacating a large verdict against Kim's client, a mutual insurance company, on the basis that the insurer's conduct in handling a fire damage claim did not constitute bad faith as a matter ofcourt and awarded a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, vacating a large verdict against Kim's client, a mutual insurance company, on the basis that the insurer's conduct in handling a fire damage claim did not constitute bad faith as a matter of law.

The court reversed the trial court's partial summary judgment dismissing the contributory negligence defense.

The Appeals Court reversed and remanded, reasoning that the trial court incorrectly converted the 12 (b)(6) motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment and failed to follow caselaw related to other similar statCourt reversed and remanded, reasoning that the trial court incorrectly converted the 12 (b)(6) motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment and failed to follow caselaw related to other similar statcourt incorrectly converted the 12 (b)(6) motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment and failed to follow caselaw related to other similar statutes.

Thus, the court reversed the trial court's earlier denial of summary judgment favoring the city.

In the first comprehensive appellate decision interpreting Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1042.3 - 1042.6, Pennsylvania's tort reform measure intended to increase the threshold of merit for professional liability actions, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded for the entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of John's client, a physician, based upon the plaintiff's failure to file a certificate of merit in support of his medical malpractice cCourt reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded for the entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of John's client, a physician, based upon the plaintiff's failure to file a certificate of merit in support of his medical malpractice ccourt and remanded for the entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of John's client, a physician, based upon the plaintiff's failure to file a certificate of merit in support of his medical malpractice claim.

The trial court quashed the citations because the appeals court reversed the plaintiff's judgment.

Accordingly, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's denial of summary judgCourt of Appeals reversed the trial court's denial of summary judgcourt's denial of summary judgment.

This Court, relying on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254, and Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U. S. 64, reverses that judgment and remands to the state court under conditions expressed in its opinion that will allow a new trial and another judgment against RosenbCourt, relying on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254, and Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U. S. 64, reverses that judgment and remands to the state court under conditions expressed in its opinion that will allow a new trial and another judgment against Rosenbcourt under conditions expressed in its opinion that will allow a new trial and another judgment against Rosenblatt.

Apart from the proceedings of the CJC against Justice Camp, his decision was reversed on appeal, with the Alberta Court of Appeal stating that, «We are also persuaded that sexual stereotypes and stereotypical myths, which have long since been discredited, may have found their way into the trial judge's judgment»: R v. Wagar, 2015 ABCA 327 at para. 4.

In the case of Rodriguez vs. Del Sol Shopping Center Associates LLC, NM 2014 (Docket Nos. 33,896, 33,949) the Court reversed a lower court's judgment that threw out the plaintiffs» suit and instead sent the case back down to go to tCourt reversed a lower court's judgment that threw out the plaintiffs» suit and instead sent the case back down to go to tcourt's judgment that threw out the plaintiffs» suit and instead sent the case back down to go to trial.

Summary judgment by the Louisiana Supreme Court in favor of an employer in an industrial - accident case, reversing judgments of the trial and appellate courts.

For these reasons, the dissenting judge would have reversed the trial court's summary judgment.

The state Supreme Court reversed the summary judgment order and remanded the case to the trial cCourt reversed the summary judgment order and remanded the case to the trial courtcourt.

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's order granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs, and denying summary judgment for the defendants, in a dispute over insurance coveCourt of Appeals reversed a trial court's order granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs, and denying summary judgment for the defendants, in a dispute over insurance covecourt's order granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs, and denying summary judgment for the defendants, in a dispute over insurance coverage.

Rule of Law Court of Appeal Varies Trial Decision in Chinn v. Hanrieder The Court of Appeal, in reasons for judgment released on June 27, 2013, in Chinn v. Hanrieder, 2013 BCCA 310 (CanLII), reversed the trial judge's holding that Ingrid Hanrieder held her interest in a family trust that held mineral rights on a secret trust for her late husband's two children, Bette Chinn and Dennis HanriTrial Decision in Chinn v. Hanrieder The Court of Appeal, in reasons for judgment released on June 27, 2013, in Chinn v. Hanrieder, 2013 BCCA 310 (CanLII), reversed the trial judge's holding that Ingrid Hanrieder held her interest in a family trust that held mineral rights on a secret trust for her late husband's two children, Bette Chinn and Dennis Hanritrial judge's holding that Ingrid Hanrieder held her interest in a family trust that held mineral rights on a secret trust for her late husband's two children, Bette Chinn and Dennis Hanrieder.

The court also reversed the trial judgment dismissing the claims relating to the defendant's adoption and use of the plaintiff's official marks, VCC and Vancouver Community College, as keywords.

Federal appellate court reversed trial court's summary judgment, allowing resident to pursue claim that city's failure to make reasonable accommodation to municipal ordinance and permit resident to keep a miniature horse as a service animal on resident's property was in violation of the ADA and FHA.

Thus, the court reversed the lower court and sent the case back to the trial court with an order to enter judgment in favor of the Salesperson for the unpaid commission amounts.

Thus, the trial court was reversed and the court ordered judgment to be entered in favor of the Investors.

Welch Real Estate v. Heritage Broadcasting Corp. (192 A.D. 2d 891) trial court judgment for broker reversed on appeal as commission entitlement was conditioned on passage of title.

Because the evidentiary material presented to the trial court establishes disputed material facts about the Sellers» and Broker's actual knowledge of the alleged defects in the residence, we reverse the order granting summary judgment.