State Appellate Court
Reverses Jury Verdict for Plaintiff in Accident Lawsuit, New Mexico Personal Injury Lawyer Blog, October 12, 2016.
The ruling
reversed a jury verdict against former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican.
On appeal, the Fifth Circuit not only
reversed the jury verdict, but also directed that our client be awarded monetary damages plus attorney's fees and costs.
She argued that the judge should have instructed the jury on the «presumption of negligence» and because the judge declined to do so, the appellate court should
reverse the jury verdict.
A court of appeals in California recently released an opinion in a personal injury lawsuit that
reversed a jury verdict in favor of a plaintiff who sustained injuries when he was struck by a vehicle being driven by an employee of the defendant as he returned from work.
Often everyone even knows that the jury reached its verdict because it misunderstood the law or the facts, based upon interviews with the jurors immediately following the trial, but nothing can be done about that to
reverse a jury verdict if a sincere jury following the instructions could have reached the same conclusion if they'd viewed the credibility of the witnesses differently.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
reversed the jury verdict award for the future commissions.
Thus, the court
reversed the jury verdict's award of future commissions but affirmed the other awards as well as the other rulings of the trial court.
Not exact matches
The
jury's
verdict came on the same day that a federal appeals court
reversed the conviction of a former Jefferies Group LLC managing director who is serving prison time for lying to customers about the prices of mortgage - backed bonds.
The
jury's
verdict came on the same day that a federal appeals court
reversed the conviction of a former Jefferies Group managing director who is serving prison time for lying to customers about the prices of mortgage - backed bonds.
Court
Reverses Jury's
Verdict Based on Lack of Evidence Showing the Defendant Knew about Hazard that Caused Plaintiff's Fall, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog, published November 27, 2017.
The New Jersey Supreme Court
reversed and remanded Borough of Harvey Cedars v. Harvey Karan and Phyllis Karan, thereby overturning a
jury verdict, trial court and appellate decisions that awarded the Karans $ 375,000 for the taking of a beach replenishment easement and damages to the remainder.
The case was tried
reverse bifurcated and after phase I the
jury returned a
verdict in favor of the defense, finding that the decedent's mesothelioma was not caused by his asbestos exposure.
The case was tried
reverse bifurcated and after 40 minutes the
jury returned a
verdict for the defense after the first phase of the case.
Won an appeal at the Supreme Judicial Court
reversing a seven figure handicap discrimination
jury verdict and dismissal of the case against our employer - client.
«
Reversing and remanding a $ 1.8 million
jury verdict, the Second Circuit found Tuesday that Rite Aid was justified in firing a needle - phobic pharmacist who refused to administer immunizations.»
Won
jury verdict for Microsoft on three out of four patents, adverse
verdict on one patent
reversed by Federal Circuit.
Jury returned verdict for plaintiff, but Federal Circuit reversed jury's verdict and entered judgment on behalf of T
Jury returned
verdict for plaintiff, but Federal Circuit
reversed jury's verdict and entered judgment on behalf of T
jury's
verdict and entered judgment on behalf of Tyco.
(3) If a
jury find of fact is against the evidence, courts have frequently
reversed juries (eg see New York HLD, v. 30, n. 4), however, they are not supposed to do so, unless the
verdict is a gross miscarriage of justice.
Every year, several
jury verdicts are
reversed and expensive new trials are ordered because of the risk of a serious error in the deliberative process.
Jury nullification is also only effective, for the most part, in criminal cases, as a jury verdict in a civil case can be reversed if under the correct law no evidence in the record supports the verd
Jury nullification is also only effective, for the most part, in criminal cases, as a
jury verdict in a civil case can be reversed if under the correct law no evidence in the record supports the verd
jury verdict in a civil case can be
reversed if under the correct law no evidence in the record supports the
verdict.
court of appeals under the Seventh Amendment to
reverse a judgment entered on a
verdict of a
jury and direct judgment for the other party, in conformity with a state practice, are stated in the opinion.
And if the court isn't willing to
reverse its earlier decision, we also explain why the
jury's fair use
verdict was proper.
Thus, the court
reversed the trial court's overruling of the
jury verdict, finding the Broker liable for intentional misrepresentations.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
reversed the trial court and reinstated the
jury verdict.
Therefore, the court
reversed the trial court and reinstated the
jury verdict in favor of the Owners.