Sentences with phrase «reviewed research section»

The following is a response to a commentary written about the 2012 research study displayed in the above Relevant Published, Peer - Reviewed Research section: Spieker, S. J., Oxford, M. L., Kelly, J. F., Nelson, E. M., & Fleming, C. B. (2012).

See Relevant Published, Peer - Reviewed Research Section below for research summary.

See our peer - reviewed research section at CoconutOil.com.

Not exact matches

2 Innovation Canada: A Call to Action, Review of Federal Support to Research and Development — Expert Panel, section 6, «Overview of the SR&ED Program», October 17, 2011.

These sections are then followed by three more that review contemporary research on mental health, physical disorders, and the use of health services in relation to religion.

We also encourage you to review their terrific Physical Activity Resources page, which includes three tabbed sections — At School, At Home, and Research — designed to help you expand or increase the physical activity opportunities at your school.

The Huffington Post recently claimed that early administration of epidurals may delay labor or make a C - section more likely to rest, citing a research review of nine studies that showed no such support.

In this section you can read trusted, well - researched and in - depth double stroller reviews.

A review of good quality research on this subject found that if the twin that will be born first (i.e. is lowest in the womb) is head down there is no good evidence that caesarean section will be safer than a vaginal birth for the mother or babies.

The only other requirements are that they must have published research recently in a peer - reviewed journal, and they must not have served yet on a CSR study section.

I realize that your «Working Group On Review Of Bioengineering And Technology And Instrumentation Development Research», defined «bioengineering and technology» as encompassing areas such as biotechnology, functional genomics, informatics, chemistry and physics, nevertheless they did not discuss the problems experienced by physicists engaged in basic research on the frontier of physics and biology from the present system of study sResearch», defined «bioengineering and technology» as encompassing areas such as biotechnology, functional genomics, informatics, chemistry and physics, nevertheless they did not discuss the problems experienced by physicists engaged in basic research on the frontier of physics and biology from the present system of study sresearch on the frontier of physics and biology from the present system of study sections.

Previously, Toliver had served as the executive secretary (scientific review administrator) of the biochemistry study section of the NIH Division of Research Grants (now called the Center for Scientific Rereview administrator) of the biochemistry study section of the NIH Division of Research Grants (now called the Center for Scientific ReviewReview).

He served as member of the Experimental Therapeutics - 2 NIH Study Section (1998 - 2003), the NCI Board of Scientific Counselors (1999 - 2004), NCI Parent Subcommittee A for review of Cancer Centers (2004 - 2008), the Breast Core Committee of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), and the Board of Directors of the American Association for Cancer Research (2004 - 2007).

Alternatively, review of clinical applications in study sections reviewing predominantly laboratory - oriented research may have been less of a problem in 2002 than in 1994.

In addition to primary research articles in four formats, Cell features review and opinion articles on recent research advances and issues of interest to its broad readership in the Leading Edge section.

In this Sunday's review section of the New York Times, Nobel Prize winner Eric Kandel cited research by Emory psychiatrist Helen Mayberg and colleagues (published in JAMA Psychiatry) as a good example of research with potential for substantive impact for the treatment of mental illness:

CSR organizes the peer review groups or study sections that evaluate the majority (70 %) of the research grant applications sent to NIH.

Additionally, within each of the 7 specific categories of clinical research (October 2002 council only), there were no significant differences in review outcomes for applications reviewed by study sections reviewing 1 % to 25 % clinical applications compared with outcomes in study sections reviewing larger percentages of clinical applications.

He also serves as a peer reviewer for various scientific journals in the field of cancer research and immunology and as reviewer for grants in scientific review study sections of the NIH and National Cancer Institute (NCI).

In 1996, in response to these concerns, Varmus, then director of NIH, impaneled a group of experienced clinical investigators and academic health center administrators to make recommendations that might guide the NIH toward policy changes to alleviate the concerns in the clinical research community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented rresearch community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented rResearch Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented rresearch, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented researchresearch.

All sections welcome full length Original Research Communications, Innovative Methodologies submissions, Short Critical Review articles, full length Comprehensive Review articles, as well as Letters to the Editor.

He has served as a visiting scholar at Harvard University, on the Chemical Reviews Editorial Advisory Board, the Governor's Mathematics and Science Advisory Board for South Carolina, the Defense Science Study Group through the Institute for Defense Analyses, the Defense Science Board Chem / Nano Study Section, the Department of Commerce Emerging Technology and Research Advisory Committee and the MD Anderson Cancer Research Center's Competitive Grant Renewal Board.

Continue to the next section of the Integrated Studies Research Review, Evidence - Based Practices and Programs.

Continue to the next section of the Teacher Development Research Review, Annotated Bibliography.

All papers submitted to the research section of Education Next are subjected to peer review.

Go to the first section of the Teacher Development Research Review, Introduction and Teaching Quality.

Continue to the next section of the Comprehensive Assessment Research Review, Providing Feedback.

Continue to the next section of the Comprehensive Assessment Research Review, Motivating Students.

All papers published in the research section of Education Next have been subjected to peer review.

Go to the first section of the Tech Integration Research Review, Introduction and Learning Outcomes.

Early on, three new executive editors were brought on board: Marty West, who assumed responsibility for the journal's research section; Rick Hess, director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, who has taken charge of the forum and book review sections; and Michael Petrilli (now president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute), who along with Marci Kanstoroom, still serves as editor of the features section.

The policy - oriented research we review in this section focuses on three areas related to literacy standards and assessments: on - demand reading and writing assessments, classroom - based assessments such as portfolios, and statewide language arts content standards.

This section contains a series of Knowledge Reviews that provide a summary of what we know from experienced practitioners and research in the area of teacher leadership.

The research we review in this section falls into two general categories: on - demand forms of performance - assessments and classroom - based assessments such as portfolios.

The first three sections present our review of the policy - oriented literature related to literacy standards and assessment in terms of the three research perspectives — policy, measurement, and literacy.

In this section of the review, we include research on on - demand performance assessments that require students to demonstrate higher - order cognitive processes and to provide some extended responses to comprehension questions or to write in response to a prompt.

Each of these sections has two parts: a brief discussion of background, situating the research in its larger context, and a review of the literacy policy research within each perspective.

The Chronicle of Middle Level Education Research also features a peer - reviewed section (See

The study, theory, case, review, research, or education model described should be grounded in the literature This section encourages submissions that take advantage of the World Wide Web as a publishing medium through the inclusion of media, graphics, and / or other examples to illustrate the context and / or findings.

This section of the review summarizes historical and current research on the district's role in educational change.

(B) review present research, demonstration, and related activities to determine, in terms of the purpose specified for such activities by subsection (a) of section 202, whether and on what basis such activities should be continued, revised, or terminated.

We can help with proposal development and literature review section writing, research design and methodology selection, data collection and database construction, development of a suitable questionnaire, statistics and data analysis as well as results presentation and report preparation.

She researched the genres that members specialized in and interviewed those who agreed to review a section of her manuscript for free.

Research paper should consist of introduction, literature review, discussion section, analysis, and conclusion.

The central part of your history essay should contain the literature review sections, research methods, results, discussion and conclusions.

But we want you to know that we also offer all types of academic writing and assistance — book reviews, presentations, editing and proofreading, case studies, admissions ad scholarship essays, lab reports, research projects, thesis and dissertation proposals, along with help on any section or chapter, abstracts, math and physics problem sets, any difficult homework assignment, and multiple - choice test taking.

It consists of several sections, which include information on your research, its results, review of information sources, summary, references, and appendices.

Research paper body must contain literature review section, methodology, results, discussion, and analysis.

LendEDU's research team has taken some time to review the credit bureau section of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) complaint database.

During his tenure at Johns Hopkins, Dr. Strandberg had a tremendous impact on the field of comparative pathology and laboratory animal medicine, mentoring over 60 young pathologists and laboratory animal veterinarians, serving on national committees that developed policies for the humane use of research animals, participating in NIH study sections and site visits, and pursuing his research interests resulting in over 120 peer - reviewed publications.