In
Revised Formal Opinion 31 (1988), the CBA's Committee on Professional Ethics addressed the limits on a Connecticut law firm's common law right to a «retaining» lien — to secure fees — on the file of a contingency fee client who has discharged the firm in favor of another firm.
Not exact matches
The North Carolina State Bar published the
revised version of its proposed ethics
opinion on the use of SaaS in law practice management on April 21st, entitled, «Formal Ethics Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property&
opinion on the use of SaaS in law practice management on April 21st, entitled, «
Formal Ethics
Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property&
Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property».
Subsequently, at its August 6 & 7, 2010 meeting, COPRAC
revised the
opinion in response to the public comments received and tentatively approved Formal Opinion Interim No. 08 - 0002 for an additional 30 - day public comment distri
opinion in response to the public comments received and tentatively approved
Formal Opinion Interim No. 08 - 0002 for an additional 30 - day public comment distri
Opinion Interim No. 08 - 0002 for an additional 30 - day public comment distribution.