Sentences with phrase «rewandowski kind of striker»

Those are the kind of strikers that fit how Arsenal play and will take Arsenal to the next level with the current midfield we have.

«Arsenal need to be in the market for these kinds of strikers this month.

There is no doubting of Welbeck being a high intensity kind of a striker.

He» a nice guy and stuff, but not the kind of striker that can lead is like the Biblical Moses.

We need to understand that for our system to work we need a van persie kind of striker - a person who is as adept at scoring goals as in assisting, or may be I should say Sanchez type of striker.

Like seriously Giroud pissed me off most times I see him in Arsenal Jersey, I don't know what kind of a striker that is afraid to hold the ball and face defenders.

To do that we need a lewandowski kind of striker, someone who can score dead ball goals, someone who can score from nothing, someone who can take - on defenders single - handedly when we are canter - attacking.

Giroud is too slow for my liking and misses too many chances that is not an Arsenal kind of striker to be honest.

Yes he has helped us secure wins but he is not the kind of striker we can count on to lead us to a major trophy.

Arsene Wenger can must get Ben Yedder as long as he's clinical and can beat his man.I'd take him over Giroud any day and I think if Giroud is put in that Toulouse squad he won't score more goals than Ben Yedder and denying this fact would mean you choose to be blinded.We had better get him quickly.I've said it here time and time again the reason why Arsenal are not winning things with Giroud is because he's not clinical.If you guys were to ever watch his misses in every season by season since he came here you would be shocked at the kind of striker we have.But as usual he's always forgiven and people continually rate him basing it on statistics and forget he's playing for Arsenal with the likes of.......

He may be a little bit older than the kind of striker Man United are looking for, but he can serve as a mentor for Anthony Martial and score plenty of goals as the French youngster learns.

I think France's tactics are different form ours that's why OG plays better there, or they have better players (of course), so Lacazette may as well be a better option for us as our fast attacking tactics suits those kinds of strikers

People say we need a striker, we have a Aguerro Tevez kind of striker in Sanchez, play Wellbeck in the left and giroud as the cameo sub.

But he is a kind of striker we should be crying for.

Everybody is weighing in on what Arsenal needs to do to win the league next season and there is so much emphasis on the kind of striker that we need to buy.

To be honest not very much excited about Lacazette but good thing is, he is different kind of striker from Giroud.

I like giroud but we need someone with more dynamism even if his goal ratio is similar to giroud's own because these kind of strikers strike fear into the minds of the opponents defenders.

The vardy, Benteke kind of strikers simply isnt reliable and consistent.

Giroud, like every sensible person knows, is not really the kind of striker needed at Arsenal, perhaps second choice.

With the kind of striker and players Fab had and have what do you expect??

I love Giroud but he's not the kind of striker tha wins you league titles.

His game shows that what kind of striker we are missing.

i love that kind of striker but I D celebrate a nice goal from Giroud first cause he a gunner.

The Belgian international can also fit any tactical system as he can effectively run the channels, hold the ball up and he also has the ability to be a typical «fox in the box» kind of striker.

You'd really have to ask yourself if he'd still be here if he wasn't French.Wenger has every right to sell Giroud.If we were very ambitious we would've sold him long ago.We're treating him as if he's a crucial player.The lesson will only be learnt when Lacazette goes out with a long term injury.We will then see how good the back ups are.To me he's not a super sub as he's the kind of striker who requires service.Being a super sub is not enough because remember he's the next in line if anything happens to Lacazette.Giroud was Arsenal's main striker for a reason.Last season 99 % of the matches he scored coming of the bench were matches he should have started to give us that aerial presence but Wenger shockingly started Sanchez.It's a shame fans will blame him next season again for his short comings.The guy is just not good.It's not good enough to be strong in aerial battles alone and weak in almost every other aspect.I expect Arsenal and Arsene to do better.He must be sold.

This could be just the kind of striker they need.

He was the kind of striker we'd been yearning for.

Injury prone player & not really the kind of striker that will transfigure our forward line.

let's be honest here... the article has some points... he is right in d sense Giroud helps the teams... he is d kind of striker that helps d midfield to score goals n shine....

I hope it went well for us because watching the legend (King Henry) goal on YouTube with the assist of Dennis Berkamp, and Robert Pires really call for changes in our striking position when compare with the kind of strikers we have presently.

RVP is a different kind of striker.

The kind of striker we need is NEVER available unless he's being replaced by an even better striker, none of which exist today, which is why the manager decided to buy young strikers in hope they end up world class.

In other words, the kind of striker that'll score against tight defences that we typically draw a blank against.

Remy is a different kind of striker from Costa and Drogba, given that he's pacey and a great finisher.

He's the kind of striker that can create chances and make his own, but above all finish.

Believe me I don't rate Lacazette... not that he is not good but rather he is not the kind of striker that should permanently keep Giroud out of the team.

But now it only remains to score a lot of goals, and maybe then people would realize what kind of striker I am — said the 20 - year - old wunderkind, and concluded:

In any other side with genuine title - winning ambitions he would be a high - class option player or an impact forward to throw on and alter the shape of a contest locked down to his team's usual Plan A: the kind of striker a club like Barcelona could use off the bench but not a target - man they would build their attack around.

Like it is always when you play against Zlatan [Ibrahimovic], other strikers, these kinds of strikers — tall, good with their back to the goal — you have to avoid the crosses and you have to avoid the passes.

With the Clarets, Gray made an average of 11.6 passes per game, though he has never been the kind of striker to come short and receive the ball.

what a joke!how can we go from absolutely dominating one half to complete self destruction in the second?watching us in the first half I would have said no team in the league could have lived with us, never mind bloody Tottenham!second half were shocking.what was bales goal all about?a hoof over the top and our defence all taken out in one go.the second was an even bigger farce.why the hell couldn't cesc just head the thing.we should have been out of sight by then.what kind of striker is chamakh?what is his problem.twice he was played clean through and he had no intention of going for goal.work rate is all well and good and being able to put it in from 3 yards but if he is going to lead the line he needs to have a proper strikers instinct.sure enough if we give away enough stupid free kicks then the opposition will score because we cant defend and thats exactly what happened.we'll be winning nothing unless we buy some players with spines and balls.getting beat to 2 newly promoted teams and spurs at home.way to let chelsea off the hook fellas.what did wenger say yesterday...» best squad ive ever had....

Not exact matches

I kind of wish we had Giroud in there as an experienced striker but nevertheless we are still looking good.

Soon enough folks will realize that Sanchez is not a striker for all kind of games.

Ronaldo's famous boots - the first of their kind to be made and based on being «built for speed» - were initially known as the the Tiempo Ultra Light and were manufactured with the striker's searing pace in mind.

As Alan Smith recognises, Lucas has the ability to drift in and out amongst the defenders and the Spaniard's flexibility to also play on the wing, means that he has a very good idea about what kind of runs the wingers will want the striker to make.

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

Cap refs aside this kind of result proves he SHOULD have brought in a striker and a DM.

At the end of the day, we have a two very good and with different style strikers but admittedly kind of one dimensional.

Not that i'm pessimist but i think this time again will be a 4th place if this guy don't buy at least a striker or a Pedro kind of player in case Theo play upfront.

This deal ain't happening for sure and likeliest of this kind of deal happening would have been possible if it were Zidane or Ancelotti were you give a good striker for a top class performer.