Sentences with phrase «rights act go»

Future governments may not take such a co-operative stance, but it does make you wonder how easy they'll find it to make the Human Rights Act go away.

«I'd personally like to see the Human Rights Act go because I think we have had some problems with it,» she said.

Not exact matches

So I'm going to suggest the thing I've learned is that when it's right, you know it, and you act on it.»

You know, he loves the act of getting people to go in what he thinks is the right direction.»

Under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, about 800 counties with histories of racially - discriminatory voting laws — going back to poll taxes and literacy tests — had to get the Justice Department's approval beforehand (a process called pre-clearance) before such laws could take effect.

If the elderly studio head doesn't act fast, Universal is going to be in worse shape than it is right now.

McDonald's and the National Labor Relations Board will finally go head - to - head in court on Monday as the fast - food company faces long - standing allegations that it violated employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act.

«I think the desire to act and do something meaningful right now seems to be what's going to win the day,» he said.

There certainly is a lot of exciting stuff going on in the crypto markets right now, therefore, that might act as an indication that the crypto markets are going to continue to grow.

If our friends at Deutsche Bank are right in forecasting the US unemployment rate to decline from the current 17 year low of 4.1 per cent to 3.2 per cent by - late 2019, the US Federal Reserve are going to have a delicate balancing act as they lift the cash rate in trying to keep inflationary expectations under control.

There's a common attitude among traders who see potential for a big score or have seen enough deals on which they acted cautiously go right through the roof to have an impulse toward risky behavior.

Mr. Anglin has a habit of saying what he thinks — which, despite the claims of the Wildrose Party and other right - wing Western Canadian political groups that's how elected officials should act, doesn't really go over that well in the real world of politics.

If we go by your premise that «Some of us do the right thing because it is the right thing» and those of Faith because we are threatened, then why have we not acted more on the prescribed punishments that are threatened and demanded by God?

If the far right wants to act like they are more special than the rest of Americans than fine make all people married under the government go back and change the wording on their license to read Cilvil Union.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

Love, while rejecting power and going beyond the rights and duties established by justice, establishes a will for justice and a moral motivation which crowns the just act.

Unlike other religions, Christianity is not a social religion - you don't go to heaven just because you went to the right church or acted kind to others.

While Smedes and the other editors of The Reformed Journal do not deny the need or desirability of Christian acts of compassion, they argue that structural violence demands social redress that goes beyond benevolence, being based first of all in the human rights of the victims.

Time for them to take that last breath and send a warning to their far right fringe that we as Americans are not going to sit idly by and allow inhumanity to be acted upon.

As a thought, I have been trying a «leadership» practice which seems to me to go off at right angles to the balancing act / continuum of authority you describe.

When his contemporaries spoke of the conscience, Newman said that «they in no sense mean the rights of the Creator, nor the duty to Him, in thought and deed, of the creature; but the right of thinking, speaking, writing, and acting, according to their judgment or their humour, without any thought of God at all... [Conscience] becomes a license to take up any or no religion, to take up this or that and let it go again.»

And so my big act of valor this week will be simple: I'm going to pick up the first magazine I see in the grocery store, point to the cover, and laugh like a maniac, right in front of God and everybody.

Or more specifically, what right do you have, or by what logic can you tell someone not to act like there's no tomorrow if there isn't going to be one?

Mike Bennett @ Ars Moriendi with «Forget World Peace: Visualize Using Your Turn Signal» «Instead of focusing solely on all the great things we're going to be able to do once we get where we're going, let's try to act right now to bring the unity of the Kingdom right here to where we are.»

Come on mate everyone knows our club has gone threw a transactional period that we will probably never see in our life time again football has changed since the billionaires have come in we had to make the changes no other manager could of kept us in the top four while we had to change our whole structure I'm not saying wenger is perfect he does fustrate us all sometimes but were in safe hands and were going in the right direction not that I know a lot about the ffp but something is happening and every year we seem to becoming in a stronger position to what wenger is trying to achieve for our club we all know this is wenger last contract and even if he win the cl or the epl he won't sign another contract it just fustrates me that the way people act sometimes our time is coming even wen wenger leaves we will still have hope that we can compete for honours lets just enjoy beign arsenal fans and what will be will be cause wen in a very stable position and that is all the hope I need that our time will come in the future COYG

And since Ronda wants to go into acting that is definitely a fight she could win given the right script.

Dick Law, Wenger and Gazidis should have realised that everyone was gonna come in for Monaco players therefore you have to act fast to get the right player at the right price.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now

«When he [Wenger] does come back at some stage, they're going to be embarrassed about the way they're acting right now.

With Giroud essentially acting as a pivot or a wall in the final 3rd, everything that went in to him came right back to Mesut to then play the final ball.

The Swede was wanted by Wenger when he was just a young obsure player acting as a striker for Malmo, but the Frenchman wanted him on trial and even though the one called now by Milan's fans «Ibracadabra» wanted to join, he refused to go to «auditions» saying that he must be signed right away.

Sometimes, I'm totally present and aware of what's going on right now, and the act of kneading or mixing becomes a meditative act of mindfulness.

I've been at this blog for three weeks and have yet to discuss perhaps the most important issue going on right now with respect to school lunch — the Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act pending in Congress.

The amends should include an apology, but also a promise to make it right by acting differently going forward.

As I know right now people who have Tricare to the military they don't cover breast pumps with them but other people whom had private insurance breast pumps should be covered under the affordable care act rather it's going to be a 100 % or if you got to pay a little bit.

It's not going to happen overnight; I mean look where we are with racism despite all the decades since the Civil Rights Act.

We talked for a bit and she said something very important we all can do with hearing, «You can do everything right, directly out of the book, and they're still going to act out.

The Right to Breastfeed Act, which gives women the right to breast - feed in public, includes a provision that gives them the right to go to court against any business or agency that tries to stop them from nurRight to Breastfeed Act, which gives women the right to breast - feed in public, includes a provision that gives them the right to go to court against any business or agency that tries to stop them from nurright to breast - feed in public, includes a provision that gives them the right to go to court against any business or agency that tries to stop them from nurright to go to court against any business or agency that tries to stop them from nursing.

Many women need to get their mood just right before going on with the act of making love.

Had the Conservatives had a Parliamentary majority (or had formed a coalition with a certain party whose name shall go unmentioned), they might have found a way back to the status quo ante on at least (some of) the reforms that are practically reversible, viz. the House of Lords, the Human Rights Act, the Lord Chancellor's jurisdiction over the judiciary.

Rep Winkler was most likely acting on his party's orders to attack and criticize the supreme court justices, who made good on their previous threat to strike down the voting rights act, when he got carried away and went a bit too far.

Several months later, the DWP went back to court to argue that the first tier tribunal only had the power to identify that legislation is incompatible with the Human Rights Act - not to rule on a case on that basis.

If one believes one believes that Parliament acted ultra vares or gone beyond its powers in the approval of Kempinski hotel agreement then the person has the right as a citizen to take the matter up.

Sadiq Khan MP, shadow justice secretary, said: «The energy and time this government is spending on arguments about the Human Rights Act shows how completely out of touch it is with the British people who are not interested in cat fights between ministers but how the safety of their communities will be protected after cuts in police budgets which go too far and too fast.»

He added, «The legislature is now running for re-election and what we're saying is we want a legislature that will pass the Women's Equality Act and we have a right to know who's going to pass it, who's not going to pass it before we vote.»

It is designed to act as a barometer of party opinion to inform the leadership as to whether or not they are going in the right direction.

Human rights groups, on the other hand, argue that the Act does not go far enough, and point to numerous opportunities in the Convention for governments to opt out of certain provisions in the interests of national security.

In one blog post about a proposed ban on alcohol advertising, he wrote: «So let's get this right: we are going to ban alcohol adverts because apparently they encourage youngsters to act irresponsibly, but we allow adverts that promote abortion, which also encourages people not to take responsibility for their actions.

Skelos touted how the Legislature adhered to the provisions of the Budget Reform Act of 2007, which was «ignored» when the Democrats controlled the chamber, adding: «Now we've seen that the chaos that existed for two years is gone, and government is functioning as it should, and — right now — with a bipartisan basis.»