Sentences with phrase «rights act if»

Protects you under the Human Rights Act if you are harassed because of your membership to a particular group described in the Act.
You are protected within the Alberta Human Rights Act if you are discriminated against or harassed based on the following grounds:
OCR argues that school districts violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act if they adopt policies that are not intended to discriminate, but do have an adverse effect on some students.
However Cameron's promise came as Chris Grayling, the justice secretary, indicated the Tories would repeal the Human Rights Act if they won the next general election, a pledge designed to win back voters who have defected to Ukip.
Is that an enhancement of the Human Rights Act if this government continues to stay in power?
The Conservatives, led by David Cameron, pledged to abolish the Human Rights Act if they were elected to power and replace it with a British Bill of Rights; Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats on the other hand were adamant the HRA would not be repealed, creating something of a dilemma for the Coalition.
He said he would accept the inclusion of «sexual orientation» in the Canadian Human Rights Act if it were «clearly defined, but not if it were used as a precedent for further benefits like marital status,» the magazine stated.

Not exact matches

Before travelers consider giving new meaning to «red - eye flight,» note that airlines reserve the right to turn passengers away if they appear intoxicated, just as they do if they are acting violently, yelling, or appear ill.
Under the Credit Card Accountability and Disclosure Act, cardholders actually have the right to refuse to pay a higher annual percentage rate set by the credit card company if they meet certain requirements.
NBCUniversal, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. Section 512 as amended by Title II of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (the «Act»), reserves the right, but not the obligation, to terminate your license to use the online services if it determines in its sole and absolute discretion that you are involved in infringing activity, including alleged acts of first - time or repeat infringement, regardless of whether the material or activity is ultimately determined to be infringing.
But if the workplace is the definite cause, then employees are entitled to protection under the Canadian Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability.
Whether it's training for greater strength, becoming a platinum artist or releasing your first book, the first step in the right direction is to act as if you've already accomplished it.
The right workers in the right role can transform an entire department — maybe even an entire organization — but only if their ability to act on their intuition and creativity is unleashed.
If the elderly studio head doesn't act fast, Universal is going to be in worse shape than it is right now.
During a CNN debate over the future of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, Sen. Bernie Sanders asked Sen. Ted Cruz if healthcare should be a right for all Americans.
Also, be mindful that the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act prohibits employers from asking if a veteran was honorably discharged.
Under Section 55 of the Data Protection Act (Unlawful obtaining etc. of personal data), a criminal offense has not been committed if a person has acted in the reasonable belief that he had in law the right to obtain data.
We have the right to acquire all of our then - outstanding common units at the then - current trading price either if 10 % or less of our common units are held by persons other than our general partner and its affiliates or if we are required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act.
Notably, seven provinces opposed to the legislation, which, «in its drafting, if not in its intent, had serious and, in the view of the vast majority of witnesses, fatal flaws as to the constitutional violation of sections 92 and 91 of the British North America Act, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, freedom of speech, expression and association as protected by that very Charter of Rights and Freedoms,» Segal said.
If you have a problem with an invention company, under the Inventors» Rights Act of 1999, you have the right to recover your money for any damages.
He's referring to a famous episode of the TV show Seinfeld, in which the hapless George resolves to change his life for the better by acting on a new principle: «If every instinct you have is wrong, doing the exact opposite must be right
So if if people all refuse to honor to see say we to act as an equity Bitcoin and continue to use and give the old the current Bitcoin value in the market then the hash would follow that right.
If our friends at Deutsche Bank are right in forecasting the US unemployment rate to decline from the current 17 year low of 4.1 per cent to 3.2 per cent by - late 2019, the US Federal Reserve are going to have a delicate balancing act as they lift the cash rate in trying to keep inflationary expectations under control.
US considering limits on China's tech investments The US Department of the Treasury is considering deploying a little - used law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to potentially block transactions and seize assets if President Trump declares China's violation of US intellectual property rights a national emergency.
If you've come across a successful actively - managed mutual fund, it's crucial not to act right away.
Numerous traders need a demo account to familiarize with the trading platform, to experiment a few trading strategies, to perceive how prices act in this present reality and to test how their own mental trading theories work while they are under pressure to hit the right choice if the market prices of an asset hit the target or when the time lapses.
Expanding Mandates In «The Selma Analogy» (May), R. R. Reno wrote, «I certainly hope that if I had been in Goldwater's position I would have voted for the Civil Rights Act
This would certainly seem to be effective to confer an immunity on the listed parties for losses that are incurred in the province; but what if a party outside the province suffers losses (see Reference re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act, [1984] 1 SCR 297, 1984 CanLII 17 (SCC)-RRB-, or what if the exercise of authority under the Act rests upon a reckless understanding as to the constitutional underpinnings of a particular provision?
If one of the independent variables in an outcome, (besides an actual act of god), is prayer, then think about it... you do have a brain, right?
If we go by your premise that «Some of us do the right thing because it is the right thing» and those of Faith because we are threatened, then why have we not acted more on the prescribed punishments that are threatened and demanded by God?
If you discount the Dixiecrats who immediately became Republicans 91 % of the Dems voted for the civil rights act.
31 states give a rapist full custodial and visitation rights if their act results in a child.
If I am wrong then so be it but I bet half of you, if not most, watch TV shows like Bachelorette and Big Brother which it's ok to act like they do ONLY if they are Christians righIf I am wrong then so be it but I bet half of you, if not most, watch TV shows like Bachelorette and Big Brother which it's ok to act like they do ONLY if they are Christians righif not most, watch TV shows like Bachelorette and Big Brother which it's ok to act like they do ONLY if they are Christians righif they are Christians right?
If the far right wants to act like they are more special than the rest of Americans than fine make all people married under the government go back and change the wording on their license to read Cilvil Union.
It is not just a «trifle» debate, you do a disservice to everyone when you act as if you have it right and we theologians are arrogant.
@TRH, you act as if you are the bigger person by saying Theist have the right to believe.
So CHRIS, should Obama turn down Bill Maher's money to his PAC because Bill called Sarah Palin the «C» Word??? While I don't like Rush the Left acts if they the Right has a monopoly on HATE.
Moses also warned them first what would happen if they disobeyed it was there choice to repent or to act in there own strength.In regard to the last statement the Government justifys it by saying that it is the mother has the right to abort her children.
If we actuall had a Congress who cared about the People they swore to serve and did not take vacations 1 week for every 2 they work (new Boehner rule when he became Speaker), actually did work and created bills that were other than ending abortion rights or killing Medicare, stopped opposing ending the fraud Bush wars that raise our debt by more than a trillion a month (and Republicans then blame Obama for the rising debt from their wars), and acted like humans we would already be well into recovery.
Some Christians need to stop acting as if a.) The American Right = Christianity and b.) that «Christianity is true because it is» is a good argument
If operating in America: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (the «DMCA») provides recourse for copyright owners who believe that material appearing on the Internet infringes their rights under U.S. copyright law.
Later he would say that «those kinds of questions [to starve the afflicted child] can be answered best by the people who are right there on the scene, if they think clearly and act responsibly.»
Think it through — if your «salvation» is not assured, then you have no right to act as if it is.
And if your god has put a thought into your mind but you don't know it, and that thought causes you to act in a way that's different from how you would have acted if that thought was not there (which is the whole reason it would be put there, otherwise it would be unnecessary, right?)
I'll tell you why; because atheists aren't confident in their belief and need to try and act powerful and condescending so they can feel as if they're right.
If a person has sinned against another, he ought to make amends as far as possible, «beg pardon» in a vital and not merely a perfunctory manner, and act in the future with good will and right conduct toward the person injured.
Besides, are you suggesting that we suppress anyone's right to free speech because if you are than you need to move to one of these bass ackward countries where a less than middle school quality production of a total farce can insight people to act as a pack of rabid dogs blaming America for why they live in dirt... We are LUCKY and BLESSED to live in a land where we can smile and walk away from an opinion that we disagree with... that South Park can but Jesus in a boxing ring against Satan and depict Moses as a glowing spinning dreidl... and these nutcases want to burn and pillage because one lunatic makes a childish and stupid play on videotape?
You defenders of religion keep some interesting company: Osama Bin LLaden, Iraninan Mullahs, Saudi Wahabists (who will cut your head off in public if you preach anything but Islam), Joe Smith who preached that black people did not have souls (the church changed it mind after the civil rights act and are now bigotted against gay people), the Taliban, the pope and his child rapists, ignorant & stupid evangelicals who think that revelations is a roadmap to the future.
If he was to tell his fellow countrymen to act right, would he violate Matt 7:5?
Still, the case against teleological ethics may here offer this response: Granting the difference between direct and indirect applications, this yields only the familiar distinction between «act - teleology» and «rule - teleology, «3 is problematic for the following reason: Social practices or patterns of social cooperation can not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of rules or norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to produce.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z