Sentences with phrase «rights act when»

I encourage everyone to reflect on the life of Martin Luther King Jr. and his efforts to pass the Civil Rights Act when thinking about our partisan problem.

In 2007 he framed the proposal as the antithesis of the Human Rights Act when he blamed the latter for creating «an excessive sensitivity to the demands of criminals».

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) used the case of Jayson and Charlotte Carmichael, who successfully challenged the bedroom tax at the Supreme Court, to prevent other people from relying on the Human Rights Act when appealing against benefits decisions at the first tier tribunal.

Not exact matches

So I'm going to suggest the thing I've learned is that when it's right, you know it, and you act on it.»

When you act on ideas you truly care about, you are more likely to be right and more likely to work hard enough to succeed.

It's not about how they act when they know the right answer.

However, when caught in that «overwhelmed» place — where the inverse equation of increasing demands and shrinking resources forces you into constant reaction mode — you might feel that there's no other choice but to act right now.

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, when you apply for business credit, a lender has the right to look at your personal credit profile to evaluate whether to issue it to you.

With Steve Jobs on side, maybe the folks at Heritage / Industry will reconsider their quaint attachment to rigid intellectual property rights measures when they set about drafting amendments to the copyright act.

«A smart man can not follow another man blindly even though the other man is right, because you can not have the confidence and act on advice when you do not know what it is based on.»

In other words, what this statistic shows is that Bill 6 was desperately needed, and that the Enhanced Protection for Farm and Ranch Workers Act courageously passed by the Alberta Legislature on Dec. 10, 2015, by the government of Premier Rachel Notley in the face of huge — and when it came to its political opponents, hugely dishonest — opposition was the right thing to do.

While our approach to deal making is patient, we act quickly and decisively when the time is right for a capital raise.

When President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, he cemented a political alliance between African Americans and the Democratic Party that continues to this day.

Numerous traders need a demo account to familiarize with the trading platform, to experiment a few trading strategies, to perceive how prices act in this present reality and to test how their own mental trading theories work while they are under pressure to hit the right choice if the market prices of an asset hit the target or when the time lapses.

There are many factors other than just the market that determines when it is right for a particular seller / buyer to act.

A preamble to an Act can not creates rights and obligation for persons but it can and should be used in the interpretation of the Act, and especially open textured provisions of the Act such as the power of the Minister under s 2 (3)(c) to consider any matter she considers relevant when making an order to require a person to obtain a licence for the export of natural gas, crude oil or refined fuels.

When doing what is «right» becomes an act of heroism it shows just how lost a culture becomes when hate and fear takes contWhen doing what is «right» becomes an act of heroism it shows just how lost a culture becomes when hate and fear takes contwhen hate and fear takes control.

The primary function of civil law is to limit freedom when an act impinges on the right of another individual or on the rights of society.

It is not just a «trifle» debate, you do a disservice to everyone when you act as if you have it right and we theologians are arrogant.

If we actuall had a Congress who cared about the People they swore to serve and did not take vacations 1 week for every 2 they work (new Boehner rule when he became Speaker), actually did work and created bills that were other than ending abortion rights or killing Medicare, stopped opposing ending the fraud Bush wars that raise our debt by more than a trillion a month (and Republicans then blame Obama for the rising debt from their wars), and acted like humans we would already be well into recovery.

When feasible, it is Company's preference to give notice so that violations may be addressed voluntarily, however, we reserve the right to act without notice, when necessary, as determined by Company in its sole discretWhen feasible, it is Company's preference to give notice so that violations may be addressed voluntarily, however, we reserve the right to act without notice, when necessary, as determined by Company in its sole discretwhen necessary, as determined by Company in its sole discretion.

Nonetheless, human beings are naturally religious when by that we mean that they possess, by virtue of their given ontological being, a complex set of innate features, capacities, powers, limitations, and tendencies that give them the capacity to think, perceive, feel, imagine, desire, and act religiously and that under the right conditions tend to predispose and direct them toward religion.

On the other hand, intrepid soldiers sometimes miraculously survive, even when their companions are falling left and right, because they act in a purposeful and deliberate fashion that unnerves the enemy.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

It is entirely possible that, at a time when very important decisions have to be made and acted upon for the good of humankind and the planet as a whole, far too many people will focus their attention on their own immediate vicinity and insist on claiming their individual right to act within it as they wish.

Pius XII, in a further clarification of the standard argument, holds that when the State, acting by its ministerial power, uses the death penalty, it does not exercise dominion over human life but only recognizes that the criminal, by a kind of moral suicide, has deprived himself of the right to life.

Janet E. Smith gets it right when she says, «Contraception violates both meanings of the conjugal act.

The Republican party of Lincoln became the Republican party of Romney when the Democrat LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act, which pushed all of the old Southern white racists into the Republican party.

Diggitle - Its silly when people try to act like the answer is right in front of us.

from wiki:»... The basis for allowing corporations to assert protection under the U.S. Consti tution is that they are organizations of people, and that people should not be deprived of their consti tutional rights when they act collectively.

To your last point, when I said choice is an illusion, I wasn't referring that it is impossible to make that choice, but rather that there is a «right» choice and a «wrong» choice, the «right» one being that you worship god, regardless of how weird some of the rituals might be, making you a little more than a robot, acting out a script your given, we're just slightly better because we can justify why we're acting out a command, but it takes years to understand that justification, in the beginning, you do these rituals because you're given a script and if you don't want to do it, tough.

Now when a person kills himself in a fit of anger, he acts voluntarily in violation of right reason; and that the law does not permit.

And like all the best memes, it acted as an easy shorthand for moments when the right language felt just out of reach.

You have the right to speak your mind, but when it is to the point of imposing hate and such things onto others you are acting pretty twisted.

Also, when I discuss «if war is wrong...» by «is wrong» I mean is an act that is evil / sinful / against God's ways (right now I'm using those three all as synonymous for these purposes; though we could discuss the theological distinctions between them, they are generally the same enough when trying to explain what I mean by «is wrong»).

No, but that a man stands up and says the right thing... and so has understood it, and then when he has to act does the wrong thing... and so shows that he has not understood it — yes, that is comic.

When the nation was established as a democratic republic, the people of the former English colonies, acting in their various constitutional conventions, transferred all governing power to their states and to the federal government, reserving for themselves only certain rights and powers they previously claimed to enjoy as subjects of the British Crown.

I am now ready to argue that the Christian belief in a God who acts in history entails the belief that God has aims for institutions and that a nation or a church, or even a garden club, is in right relationship to God only when its aims are identical with his.

«Avenging Angels» — Brigham Youngs murderers — they did his bidding like the Mason Family Mountain Meadows Massacre — the massacre of 30 men 40 women and 70 children in Utah by the «Avenging Angels» see «Blood of the Prophets» by Will Bagley (mormon author) Blood Atonement — the practice of the mormons that atones for the death of its members and / or the act of which the mormons retaliate when they do not believe one is following what they think is right — google the 1984 murder the Lafferty brothers commited in Utah of their sister in - law and her 9 month old daughter by slitting their throats.

One of the standard criticisms of virtue ethics is that it is weak when dealing with issues in applied ethics, in contrast to deontology or utilitarianism, and this because virtue theorists focus on good or bad agents rather than right or wrong acts.

It was less than 50 years ago when we finally passed the federal voting rights act in this country and less than 150 years since slavery was abolished.

He could not rest when the crowds were cheering or when Lyndon Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act.

Third, when we say that a wrong act is a sin, even if we do not conceive of God as standing in judgment we are still pointing out that there is another dimension involved in our choices between right and wrong.

When the dam of past episcopal miscreance broke in Boston last January, district attorneys began to be more assertive about the possible complicity of bishops in criminal acts, and bishops felt forced to compromise traditional and legal prerogatives related to the Church's right to govern itself.

It violated the Federal Fair Housing Act, and no... she didn't sign away her rights to that protection when she signed a contract.

Every religion is filled with people who have deep emotional experiences when they pray, commune with God, perform religious acts, etc, that are entirely convincing to them that they are right.

When I read about Calvin and others ideas on what Gods Word says, the Arminian, Lytheran, Wesleyan, Unitarian and various Church denominations and their interpretations, particularly when they hang their whole idea on one part of the Bible to prove how right they are, it affirms what I have always thought since before I was saved by God as well as after that amazing act of grace on His part, that man values and honors the mind far above the heWhen I read about Calvin and others ideas on what Gods Word says, the Arminian, Lytheran, Wesleyan, Unitarian and various Church denominations and their interpretations, particularly when they hang their whole idea on one part of the Bible to prove how right they are, it affirms what I have always thought since before I was saved by God as well as after that amazing act of grace on His part, that man values and honors the mind far above the hewhen they hang their whole idea on one part of the Bible to prove how right they are, it affirms what I have always thought since before I was saved by God as well as after that amazing act of grace on His part, that man values and honors the mind far above the heart.

«When Elane Photography refused to photograph a same - sex commitment ceremony, it violated the [New Mexico Human Rights Act, or NMHRA] in the same way as if it had refused to photograph a wedding between people of different races,» the court said in a unanimous verdict.

When his contemporaries spoke of the conscience, Newman said that «they in no sense mean the rights of the Creator, nor the duty to Him, in thought and deed, of the creature; but the right of thinking, speaking, writing, and acting, according to their judgment or their humour, without any thought of God at all... [Conscience] becomes a license to take up any or no religion, to take up this or that and let it go again.»

I think James Cone is right when he says: «Theologians of the Christian Church have not interpreted Christian ethics as an act for the liberation of the oppressed because their views of divine revelation were defined by philosophy and other cultural values rather than by the biblical theme of God as the liberator of the oppressed.»