Sentences with phrase «rights author grants»

The term «subsidiary rights» refers to the rights the author grants the publisher to «sub-license» his or her book («the work») for various formats and adaptations in addition to the primary format.

The solution is simple: All subsidiary rights an author grants to a publisher should be subject to reversion after the author's demand if they are not exercised or exploited within eighteen to twenty - four months of publication.

Grant of Exclusive Rights Author grants Publisher exclusive rights to the Work, unless this agreement is terminated for any reason, for the full term of all copyrights throughout the world, in all languages, forms, versions, editions, and written or printed media now and hereafter known.

Not exact matches

But Wharton professor and «Originals» author Adam Grant argues that we should expand our conception of procrastination to include not just laziness but also waiting for the right time.

Also, in connection with the exercise of these rights, you grant us and anyone authorized by us, the right to identify you as the author of such material by name, email address or user name, and to use your image and likeness if provided, in connection with such material.

She is the author the book, Revising Flannery O'Connor: Southern Literary Culture and the Problem of Female Authorship, a project that was one of the first recipients of the National Endowment for the Humanities Dissertation Grant, and of the white paper commissioned by the International Cesarean Awareness Network, «Protecting and Enforcing the Rights of Women Seeking Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC): A Primer.»

Authors from institutions that might limit the authors» ability to grant to AAAS any of the rights described in AAAS's license must obtain an approved waiver from their institution to publish with the Science JAuthors from institutions that might limit the authors» ability to grant to AAAS any of the rights described in AAAS's license must obtain an approved waiver from their institution to publish with the Science Jauthors» ability to grant to AAAS any of the rights described in AAAS's license must obtain an approved waiver from their institution to publish with the Science Journal.

They found the ad's author, a writer living in the mountains of Oregon, and after gaining his trust over a period of years, he granted the filmmakers the rights to use his ad.

Moreover, these exclusive rights are granted at the moment of creation — something most authors don't know.

So, regardless of which subsidiary rights are then listed, the author still grants Dymocks a license to exercise all rights in the Work other than its first volume and electronic publication rights.

On repayment of all monies this agreement terminates and the rights granted to Dymocks revert to the Author.»

An author now grants non-exclusive subsidiary rights to D Publishing (but the author can not «reasonably withhold permission for D Publishing to exercise a subsidiary right»).

Rights are granted from the moment an author submits the Publishing Agreement but Dymocks can keep exclusive worldwide rights if they do as little as make an ebook available in any language in one ebook store anywhere in the Rights are granted from the moment an author submits the Publishing Agreement but Dymocks can keep exclusive worldwide rights if they do as little as make an ebook available in any language in one ebook store anywhere in the rights if they do as little as make an ebook available in any language in one ebook store anywhere in the world.

«The Author grants to D Publishing a licence: -LSB-...] to exercise, including by way of sub-licence, all rights in the Work other than its first volume and electronic publication rights (Subsidiary Rights).&rights in the Work other than its first volume and electronic publication rights (Subsidiary Rights).&rights (Subsidiary Rights).&Rights).»

For me, stickler for proper word use that I am, it's about the misappropriation of terminology (seriously, if you don't own your ISBN number and have granted rights to someone else, you are no more — and no less — independent than a commercially - published author) and the use of euphemisms — trying to escape the negative implications of something by calling it something else.

Authors grant an exclusive license to Dymocks for commercial rights worldwide for the duration of the copyright, including all subsidiary rights to the work.

On December 15, the Authors Guild posted a response to Dohle's letter that stated: «A fundamental principle of book contracts is that the grant of rights is limited.

Amazon has a potentially industry - changing idea on its hands here with Kindle Scout, as the system provides a way to give books a stamp of approval that can cut out the noise and sheer volume of self - published titles out there, and yet it manages to provide a better deal to authors than most big publishing house deals, including a 5 - year term on publishing rights granted to Kindle Press, a $ 1,500 advance, 50 % royalties paid on e-book sales, built - in Amazon.com marketing and what Amazon terms «easy rights reversion.»

All U.S. authors have the statutory right to terminate a grant of rights 35 years after publication under 17 U.S.C. 203.

The publisher will also include language granting them the right to reject the manuscript the author presents, and either requiring changes or canceling the book contract.

Any indie author that I've run into on a blog here who has wanted rights back from Kensington was granted them if they wrote to us.

Publishers acquire only the rights that they bargain for; authors retain rights they have not expressly granted to publishers.

Here the author grants the publisher the right to publish the work, as protected by copyright law.

Amazon requires that in exchange for enrolling an eBook in Kindle Unlimited, that an author grant Amazon the exclusive right to sell that eBook.

This would include the book illustrator granting all rights of the project illustrations to the author or self publisher.

It sounds conflicting, but author and translator have to grant exploitation rights to each other to market.

When a book publisher contracts with an author to publish a book, in essence, the author (who is the copyright holder) grants the publisher the right to publish the work for an agreed - upon amount of money.

These days this is a personal decision each author has to make, but if publishers would negotiate on terms, a marginal advance deal might work if the number of years for digital rights can be limited before they would automatically revert back to the author (ie 2 - 3 yrs only) or if UK rights were granted but digital rights in the US are retained.

«Our contract with Jean Craighead George, the author of Julie of the Wolves, grants us the exclusive digital rights to the book, and Open Road's e-book edition violates our rights.

If rights have not been exploited for a year, or were never exploited within two years of a grant, then the author automatically gets the rights back.

Does the contact specify what sorts of intellectual property and moral rights that you as an author would be granting Fiberead, such as how your photo and biography will be edited and displayed?

To let the publisher make and sell these products, the author has granted the publisher a bunch of «primary» rights.

Any rights that are not exploited within two years after they are granted should revert automatically to the author.

In that initial transaction — the author's grant of rights to a third party — the author often loses control and much of the benefit of her work.

«The Author (s) have supplied the work for publication to the publisher and hereby grant (s) to the Publisher, the full and exclusive right on the terms specified in this agreement, to print, publish, and to sell the work and all subsequent revisions and adaptations thereof only for South Asia, Afghanistan, Mauritius and UAE in English, Hindi, Urdu languages, in hard or soft cover and in text, trade, reprint, and other Print editions.»

Certainly authors feel perplexed about this problem, and even the concept of partial rights — as in a major seller granting only print rights to a big house while retaining e-rights (Andre, Howey, etc.)-- even that is in question as the industry takes a breath and asks itself how quickly precedent might become standard procedure.

However, Harlequin, before and after the signing of these agreements, performed all the publishing functions related to the agreements, including exercising, selling, licensing, or sublicensing the e-book rights granted by the authors.

Making books available for library lending is an obligation which comes with the rights granted under copyright law, and is limited in very important ways which mean that it has relatively little effect on authors» earning power, and for the vast majority of them it makes up a very small proportion of their total income, so the zero - sum effect doesn't really kick in.

Explore Your Options In the publishing industry, publishing contracts often contain clauses that state if audio rights are granted to the print book publisher, but not brought to life reasonably soon after a book's publication (for example, sixty or ninety days after print publication of the book), the audio rights revert back to an author.

«All rights granted to the publisher revert to the author automatically upon termination of this agreement, regardless of the reason for termination.»

The rates vary depending on the rights granted but in general, the author should get at least 50 % of the sub-licensed rights.

In re-reading my 2007 contract, I find I have express media rights retained as well as some that would fall under this «authors retain rights they have not expressly granted to publishers» dynamic.

The author will retain the copyright, but grant specific rights to a publisher regarding the production, distribution, and sale of a specified work.

Author hereby grants and assigns to Smashwords the nonexclusive worldwide right to digitally publish, distribute, market and sell («Publish»), and to license others to do so, the work identified on the front page of your submission (the «Work»).

Translation: The writer is granting to Author Solutions the exclusive right to distribute the book in print, digital, audio and any other format, in any language.

A broad grant of exclusive rights makes sense in a traditional publishing contract because the traditional publisher is investing money into editing, designing, and marketing the author's work.

As it is with all of our titles, the author continues to own all rights because they are only granting us permission to publish and distribute their book in exchange for monthly royalties paid on each book sold.

Effective as of the date we remove each fan author's work, we will revert the rights granted to us by that fan author.

Granted, not many are reputable; many are indeed self - pub services — but they are still considered contracts to the authors signing their rights away.

Our reversion letter to each applicable fan author will provide that such reversion is subject to the rights we granted to you in the Kindle Worlds License Agreement between you and us.