Sentences with phrase «rights case commented»

Condominiums, Oppressive Conduct and Human Rights Case commented on: Condominium Corporation No 072 9313 (Trails of Mill Creek) v Schultz, 2016 ABQB 338 (CanLII) I have commented a couple of times previously... Continue reading →

By: Joshua Sealy - Harrington and Marita Zouravlioff PDF Version: Trinity Western Decision Fails to Clarify Approach to Balancing Conflicting Charter Rights Case Commented On: Trinity Western University v The Law Society of Upper Canada, 2016 ONCA 518 (CanLII) Two days before Canada... Continue reading →

Not exact matches

Because the case is pending I can't comment other than to say that at Bounce Exchange we respect intellectual property rights.

But Levandowski, asserting his Fifth Amendment right to avoid self - incrimination, has not publicly denied taking the files or otherwise commented on the case.

Commenting on this case, Ms. Rashmi Deshpande, Associate partner, Khaitan & Co. said, «The move by the RBI has put the burgeoning cryptocurrency sector in jeopardy and may affect the basic rights of such entities to carry on any trade.

Amid the furor over Akin's comments - for which he apologized this week, even as many Republican leaders have called for him to end his campaign - many anti-abortion activists have stuck by their stance against abortion rights in the case of rape.

MSU can not comment on the expulsion or the Title IX component of the Mumphery case due to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).

BHA Chief Executive Andrew Copson commented: «The question courts must ask themselves in cases such as this one is whether the manifestation of one person's religious identity will interfere with the rights of others.

Andrew Copson, BHA Chief Executive, commented «Paul Lamb is taking a courageous step in waiving his right to anonymity and we fully support him and his legal case.

The judge, Anthony Yeboah, who made the comments cautioning both parties in the case, said the suit is about the human rights of an individual and therefore should not be unduly delayed.

Pavan Dhaliwal, BHA Head of Public Affairs, commented that «we support Tony Nicklinson's legal case to establish the right to have a doctor lawfully end his life.

@tim Rather than get into it in the comments here, I added more supporting evidence in my answer from the Human Rights Tribunal decision regarding the Vancouver Police case

Hodge Jones & Allen LLP's Nancy Collins, who is representing Humanists UK in the case, commented, «The issue at stake in this appeal is of fundamental importance; the right of those with terminal illnesses to choose when and how they die.

Gold membership features: • There are advanced search features, so you can narrow down the list and increase the chances of finding the right match in your case; • You can look at any other profile on the site, when you want and which one you want; • You can receive messages from others, reply to these messages, or initiate new messages; • You can see full - size photos and video, plus to leave any comments for the ones you like; • You can watch any webcam you like, without any limits; • You can send friend requests and flits to the people you like; • You can create a hotlist that can hold up to 1000 members; • Customer support is provided with priority, via phone, and via e-mail, if you want, with an answer received in approximately 12 hours; • You can see when there is a contest of photographs, and you can participate by commenting, viewing and liking your favorite photos; • You can upload photos and videos to your own profile; • You will enjoy access to the available groups and blogs; • You can use chat rooms or IMs of the members to communicate in real time with them;

→ 33 Comments Tags: Danny Boyle, Dev Patel, Doubt, Heath Ledger, Jenny Lumet, Let the Right One In, Meryl Streep, Mickey Rourke, Rosemarie DeWitt, Simon Beaufoy, Slumdog Millionaire, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, The Wrestler, WALL - E, Washington D.C. Area Film Critics Association Filed in: Daily

→ 8 Comments Tags: David Fincher, Debra Winger, Let the Right One In, Marisa Tomei, Oscarweb, Rachel Getting Married, Revolutionary Road, Stepehn Daldry, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, The Reader Filed in: Daily

More recently, The Third Circuit, in a case from Pennsylvania, affirmed a school board's motion for summary judgment in response to a teacher's claim that officials violated her free speech rights for terminating her employment over comments she posted on her blog (Munroe v. Central Bucks School District, 2015).

Responding to a comment by DeVos that she couldn't think of an ongoing civil rights issue that would warrant federal involvement, Lhamon, in an op - ed for The Hechinger Report, ran down the types of cases her office had worked on: a North Carolina University revoking a student's acceptance after discovering he had cerebral palsy; a segregated Alabama school district offering advanced courses at its high schools that served primarily white students, but not at the high school that served virtually all of its black students; California district employees ignoring sexual assault cases because they considered them part of their Latino students» «urban culture.»

If you're not into tweeting, feel free to leave your answer in the comments right here on The Book Case.

In any case, right near the top was a recent paper http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/reference/bibliography/2004/tk0401.pdf that gives Trenberth's comments (over which Landsea quit the IPCC process) quite a bit more weight.

We reserve the right to either reject comments that do not meet the above criteria, or in certain cases to edit them in a manner that brings them into accordance with our comments policy (e.g. by simply deleting inflammatory or ad hominem language from an otherwise worthy comment).

The decision references a previous case in which «the court found that certain published comments were not defamatory because they were so ludicrous and outrageous as to be unbelievable and therefore incapable of lowering the reputation of the plaintiff in the minds of right - thinking persons.»

And in this particular case, I don't think any of the comments, including Mosher's, get the comparison right.

I didn't claim that they'd made claims «that are obviously at variance with mainstream science» — I claimed that for every loony right wing quote you could find (in your case focussing on anti-science) I could find quotes from leading leading leftys that are equally loony on other topics — I specifically mentioned global trade, because Brown and Milne have made some particularly silly and non-mainstream comments about things like the US FTA, trade with Japan (in a whaling context) or trade with China (in a human rights context).

This would be unworthy of comment in most cases, but Cockburn stands out as one of only a few left - wing contrarians, as opposed to the more usual right - wing variety.

Mike Cernovich comments that city defendants are the «frequent flyers» of verdicts in civil rights actions, in part because rulings like Kozinski's are rare: Cernovich can't recall a case where an appellant was assessed double costs for filing a civil appeal.

Occasionally, they will comment on whether they think courts have reached the right outcomes in these evidence cases or note fishy behavior by prosecutors.

When Advocate General Jääskinen delivered his Opinion in the Google Spain case in June of last year (as commented upon on this blog here), it seemed to many (myself included) that it was the last nail in the coffin of the controversial «right to be forgotten» provided for in the EU's Proposed Data Protection Regulation.

By: Sarah Burton PDF Version: Life, Liberty, and the Right to CanLII: Legal Research Behind Bars Case Commented On: R v Biever, 2015 ABQB 301 The link between access to information and access to justice is not often discussed, but... Continue reading →

Clearly, this move of the Parliament was inspired by the activism of the CJEU which had proved to be extremely demanding on the protection of personal data in the framework of the fight against terrorism in its famous Digital Rights Ireland case (DRI, commented on this blog).

The test was not met in this case because there were other parking facilities available to W. Comment The Court of Appeal has clarified that the test for whether a right to park should be implied, ie reasonable necessity, is a high hurdle to get over.

Marek undoubtedly attracted some attention of legal professionals with his comment on VALE: a case concerning the right of establishment of companies and cross-border conversion.

For example, the EU competence in criminal matters is central in Mitsilegas» analysis, but Murphy also briefly comments upon the issue; the varied geometry as regards the application of EU rules among the Member States is explained by both Peers and Herlin - Karnell; the EU accession to the ECHR is analysed in the context of fundamental rights protection (Konstadinides and O'Meara) and as an external factor of shaping the AFSJ (Eckes); besides, some cases (Melloni, Radu, Kadi and NS) are particularly popular among the academics and for good reasons.

If Zobel is right, then one of those bad things is that a judge who speaks to a journalist may end up overstepping an ethical boundary that limits the ability of judges to comment on cases publicly.

By: Jennifer Koshan PDF Version: Alberta Human Rights Act Applies to Condominium Corporations Case Commented On: Condominium Corporation No 052 0580 v Alberta (Human Rights Commission), 2016 ABQB 183 (CanLII) A few years ago I wrote a post arguing that... Continue reading →

I will comment that in this case this view is reinforced by the fact that TWU has largely been exempted from the operation of the Human Rights Code in relation to certain matters which suggests an intention to move the analysis out of the adjudicative and into the realm of policy analysis.

This did not stop the Daily Mirror carrying a comment piece on the same case under the title «Human Rights Are All Wrong».

By: Sarah Burton PDF Version: What Happens when a Self - Rep Steps on a Procedural Landmine during Judicial Review Case Commented On: Raczynska v Alberta Human Rights Commission, 2015 ABQB 494 The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench recently rejected an application... Continue reading →

By: Jennifer Koshan PDF Version: Human Rights, the Charter, and Access to Justice Case Commented On: Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FCA 200 (CanLII) This summer, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the ruling of the Canadian... Continue reading →

Tags: bc injury law, Demarinis v. Skoronek, Mr. Justice Voith, right of way, section 119 motor vehicle act, Section 173 Motor Vehicle Act, Section 175 Motor Vehicle Act, section 186 Motor Vehicle Act Posted in ICBC Liability (fault) Cases Direct Link Comments Off top ^

The judge commented that from the three often quoted cases of Page v Hewetts Solicitors [2013] EWHC 2845 (Ch), Lewis v Ward Hadaway [2015] EWHC 3503 (Ch), and Bhatti v Asghar [2016] EWHC 1049 (QB), dealing with the question whether a party could lose his rights to bring a claim or to make an application because of an error in the court office, case law had developed a «somewhat hard edged principle».

By: Alice Woolley PDF Version: Access to Justice in Criminal Law Case Commented On: R. v Moodie, 2016 ONSC 3469 (CanLII) The Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees everyone the right to retain and instruct counsel on arrest or detention.

Linda McKay - Panos, Costs Take Centre Stage in Human Rights Case, a comment on Alberta (Human Rights and Citizenship Commission Panel) v Tequila Bar & Grill Ltd., 2009 ABQB 226 (CanLII)

ABlawg.ca A farmee that spuds in the test well has the right to a default notice Case commented on: EOG Resources Canada v Unconventional Gas Resources Canada Operating Inc., 2013 ABQB 105 (MC) This decision interprets the default clause (Article 13) of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Landmen's (CAPL) Farmout and Royalty Procedure.

In a 2015 article entitled, «One Law for All: Perspectives from a Statutory Tribunal» (available online at: www.queensu.ca/clcw/sites/webpublish.queensu.ca.clcwwww/files/files/Weber%20Symposium/ Jo - Anne % 20Pickel % 20Paper.pdf), Jo - Anne Pickel, a Vice-Chair at the HRTO, commented on the challenges of adjudicating cases that involve conflicts between human rights and collectively bargained rights.

Comment: Many commenters supported the policy in the proposed definition of «individual» at proposed § 164.502, which would have permitted unemancipated minors to exercise, on Start Printed Page 82582their own behalf, rights granted to individuals in cases where they consented to the underlying health care.

Adam Wagner at the UK Human Rights blog commented on the case yesterday and reminded readers of the need for bloggers and tweeters to be particularly careful to avoid prejudicing a fair trial.

regarding comment # 11, the «find by citation'tool is incorporated right into the 2d search box of the main window: «2: statute name / case name / citation / docket number»

Commenting on the case which has been dropped by Marvel and DC Comics against a British businessman over the legal right to use the word «superhero», IP expert, Tristan Sherliker, associate solicitor, EIP, said: «This news is great for Mr Jules.

Providing in - depth analysis and drawing together legislation, case law, analysis and comment Corporate Insolvency: Pension Rights focuses on the application of the rules relating to corporate insolvency and how they impact on pensions.