Not exact matches
The Canadian bill C - 16 («An Act to
amend the Canadian Human
Rights Act and the Criminal
Code») has been the subject of heated debate and controversy.
If signed into law, the proposal would
amend the human
rights code, thus increasing anti-discrimination protections for those tenants.
Also, the District of Columbia Human
Rights Act, approved December 13, 1977 (DC Law 2 - 38; DC Official
Code § 2 - 1402.11 (2006), as
amended) states the following: Pertinent section of DC
Code § 2 - 1402.11: It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice to do any of the following acts, wholly or partially for a discriminatory reason based upon the actual or perceived: race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, personal appearance, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, family responsibilities, genetic information, disability, matriculation, or political affiliation of any individual.
Also, the District of Columbia Human
Rights Act, approved December 13, 1977 (DC Law 2 - 38; DC Official
Code § 2 - 1402.11 (2006), as
amended) states the following:
Please review the liability provisions in Account Information Brochure relating to your
rights and obligations if someone uses your access security
codes or information without your permission MOBILE CAPTURE AND REMOTE DEPOSIT CAPTURE These terms (as
amended and / or supplemented, this «Agreement») govern Member's use of Nusenda Federal Credit Union's («Credit Union») Remote Deposit / Mobile Deposit Service («Remote Deposit / Mobile Deposit» or «Service»).
Amends § § 4112.02, 4112.05, 4112.08, and 4112.14 of the Revised
Code to specify that discrimination by an employer against any person because of the person's credit history is an unlawful discriminatory practice under the Ohio Civil
Rights Law.
When the
code was last
amended in 1991, commissioners were besieged by constituents and animal -
rights activists.
Next Level Surf Camp maintains the
right to
amend or delete any information, including specs, prices, graphics, ideas, as well as the
right to discontinue
code and applications without prior notification or obligation.
The Cooper Union reserves the
right to modify and / or
amend this
Code at any time it deems necessary and in accordance with applicable laws.
When the Human
Rights Code is
amended shortly, it appears that judges will have the power to order reinstatement, force an employer to write a letter of reference and even make employers post letters of apology in the workplace or the media.
This week, the Saskatchewan government
amended its Human
Rights Code to add gender identity as a prohibited ground of discrimination, joining the Northwest Territories, Ontario, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, P.E.I. and Newfoundland and Labrador in so doing.
In a recent Human
Rights Tribunal decision, 1 the Applicant, Timothy Pritchard, filed an Application under section 34 of Part IV of the Human
Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H. 19, as
amended (the «
Code»), alleging discrimination with respect to employment on the basis of disability.
On June 30, 2008, the Ontario government
amended the Ontario Human
Rights Code («the Code») came into force that allow human rights damages under the Code to be dealt with either as civil claims before the courts or as applications before the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (
Rights Code («the
Code») came into force that allow human
rights damages under the Code to be dealt with either as civil claims before the courts or as applications before the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (
rights damages under the
Code to be dealt with either as civil claims before the courts or as applications before the Human
Rights Tribunal of Ontario (
Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO).
Rather than trying blackball TWU at the law society, if its opponents truly oppose its behaviour, they should lobby the provincial government to
amend the BC human
rights code to prohibit its actions (and consider the implications of doing so for other parties — the same provision relied upon by TWU also permits rape centers to refuse to hire transgendered persons.
If passed into law the Bill would
amend the Canadian Human
Rights Act to include «gender identity» as one of the prohibited grounds of discrimination and would change the Criminal
Code to similarly add gender identity under Canada's hate crimes laws.
The Legislature recently
amended Section 8547.10 (c) to add this «satisfactorily addressed» language to the statute, indicating that UC whistleblowers have the same
rights and protections under the Government
Code as CSU employees.
The B.C. Human
Rights Code was
amended in mid-2016 to include «gender identity or expression» as protected grounds.
Amend the Ontario Human
Rights Code to state that the
right to equal treatment with respect to goods because of age is not infringed upon by the provisions of the upcoming Smoke - Free Ontario Act, 2017.
British Columbia
amended its Human
Rights Code in July 2016 to add «gender identity and expression» as a protected ground.
On May 17, 2016, the federal government tabled Bill C - 16, An Act to
amend the Canadian Human
Rights Act and the Criminal
Code to add gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination... [more]
Bill C - 16, An Act to
amend the Canadian Human
Rights Act and the Criminal
Code, passed third reading, without amendment, in the Senate on June 15, 2017.
If passed, Bill 164 would
amend Ontario's Human
Rights Code to add four new prohibited grounds of discrimination: social condition, genetic characteristics, immigration status and police records.
On May 17, 2016, the federal government introduced Bill C - 16, An Act to
amend the Canadian Human
Rights Act and the Criminal
Code, proposed legislation adding gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination in the Canadian Human
Rights Act (CHRA).
In 2012, the Ontario Human
Rights Code was
amended to add «gender identity» and «gender expression» as prohibited grounds of discrimination.
For example, British Columbia's Human
Rights Tribunal («BCHRT»), which has a direct - access model of filing applications that is similar to the application model in Ontario,
amended their Human
Rights Code to explicitly give the BCHRT the power to award costs if one or more of the parties engage in «improper conduct», in 2002.
This amendment would align the Ontario Human
Rights Code with the Canadian Human
Rights Act, which was
amended in May 2017 to provide similar protections for those who refuse to undergo a genetic test or authorize the disclosure of its results.
What I found interesting about the proposed law is that it would have
amended the Workers Compensation Act, not the Human
Rights Code (or whatever it is called in BC), which is what I would have expected.
Bill 164 proposes
amending the Ontario Human
Rights Code (the «
Code») to include the following four new protected grounds of discrimination for individuals seeking employment, a place to live, or services:
Since its tabling in 2016, Bill C - 16 (whose official title is An Act to
Amend the Canadian Human
Rights Act and the Criminal
Code and which received royal assent in June 2017) has been the subject of great controversy.
In 2012, Ontario passed what's known as Toby's Law to
amend the Human
Rights Code to reaffirm the protection of trans people.
In 2008 the Human
Rights Code was amended to permit plaintiffs in civil lawsuits to attach a complaint of a violation of their rights as guaranteed by the
Rights Code was
amended to permit plaintiffs in civil lawsuits to attach a complaint of a violation of their
rights as guaranteed by the
rights as guaranteed by the
Code.
«The draft Bill not only creates the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act but also
amends the Canada Labour
Code and Canadian Human
Rights Act.
Report notes The Workplace Safety and Insurance Act was
amended to protect the age distinctions from discrimination complaints under the Ontario Human
Rights Code; discusses two provisions terminating benefits for older workers.
Although the Quebec government does not have the
right to
amend the Criminal
Code, it may be circumvented by Quebec's provincial jurisdiction over health and professional qualifications.
On May 17, 2016, the federal government tabled Bill C - 16, An Act to
amend the Canadian Human
Rights Act and the Criminal
Code to add gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination.
Cases decided under the
Code before it was
amended to limit the undue hardship factors to costs, health and safety and outside sources of funding, such as Roosma v. Ford Motor Co. of Canada (No. 4), (1995), 24 C.H.R.R. D / 89 and Ontario (Human
Rights Commission) v. Roosma, 2002 CanLII 15946 (ON SCDC), do not reflect the legislature's later decision to expressly limit the undue hardship factors.
If you don't like TWU's conduct, go talk to the BC government and have them
amend the BC human
right code to prohibit it.
Of course, aside from the professional obligations in place in respect to these responsibilities, there are existing responsibilities within this domain that apply to all employers, notably under the Human
Rights Code, and Bills 168 and 132,
amending the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
The committee recommends that the Collège
amend its
Code of Ethics so that physicians can practice «medical aid to die» under the criteria provided by law, while upholding their
right to conscientious objection and their duty, if appropriate, to refer their patients to another physician.
In its submission in response to the Agreements Discussion Paper, the Australian Human
Rights Commission recommended that the Native Title Act should be
amended to include explicit criteria as to what constitutes good faith, and be supplemented by a
code or framework to guide parties and the NNTT as to the requirements of good faith negotiation.
(D) The establishment of a
Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice for the Institute, Society or Council which are not inconsistent with the Code of Ethics of the National Association as from time to time amended; provided, however, that in order for its members to be eligible for Institute Affiliate Membership pursuant to Article III, such Institute, Society or Council must adopt and enforce the National Association's Code of Ethics or a code of ethics approved by the National Association that addresses the specialty area of that Institute, Society or Council, which code of ethics must apply to all persons who have been awarded a professional designation and those who hold classes of membership that confer the right to vote or hold off
Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice for the Institute, Society or Council which are not inconsistent with the
Code of Ethics of the National Association as from time to time amended; provided, however, that in order for its members to be eligible for Institute Affiliate Membership pursuant to Article III, such Institute, Society or Council must adopt and enforce the National Association's Code of Ethics or a code of ethics approved by the National Association that addresses the specialty area of that Institute, Society or Council, which code of ethics must apply to all persons who have been awarded a professional designation and those who hold classes of membership that confer the right to vote or hold off
Code of Ethics of the National Association as from time to time
amended; provided, however, that in order for its members to be eligible for Institute Affiliate Membership pursuant to Article III, such Institute, Society or Council must adopt and enforce the National Association's
Code of Ethics or a code of ethics approved by the National Association that addresses the specialty area of that Institute, Society or Council, which code of ethics must apply to all persons who have been awarded a professional designation and those who hold classes of membership that confer the right to vote or hold off
Code of Ethics or a
code of ethics approved by the National Association that addresses the specialty area of that Institute, Society or Council, which code of ethics must apply to all persons who have been awarded a professional designation and those who hold classes of membership that confer the right to vote or hold off
code of ethics approved by the National Association that addresses the specialty area of that Institute, Society or Council, which
code of ethics must apply to all persons who have been awarded a professional designation and those who hold classes of membership that confer the right to vote or hold off
code of ethics must apply to all persons who have been awarded a professional designation and those who hold classes of membership that confer the
right to vote or hold office;