Sentences with phrase «rights code protects»

The Ontario Human Rights Code protects employees on the ground of family status — that is, being in a parent - child relationship.

The Ontario Human Rights Code protects Ontarians from illegal discrimination based on race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, marital status, family status, disability or, in some situations, the receipt of public assistance.

The Ontario Human Rights Code protects people from discrimination in a variety of settings, including in employment.

The Ontario Human Rights Code protects employees from termination on the basis of several prohibited grounds, including sex and pregnancy.

For conduct occurring on or after May 14, 2015, the Human Rights Code protects you from retaliation because you:

The Ontario Human Rights Code protects workers from discrimination based on their criminal record but only in cases where it is provincially regulated employment, regardless of whether they have received a pardon.

In Ontario, the Human Rights Code protects the «right to equal treatment with respect to employment without discrimination because of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, record of offences, marital status, family status or disability» and also protects against discrimination based on the intersection of multiple of these grounds.

Not exact matches

Second, good natural law does not dictate a moral code to be imposed upon individuals; instead, it protects the right of individuals to make moral decisions free from dictation by either legislators or judges.

Moral codes and power - politics are necessary to check evil and promote legal and social justice that protects human rights of the weak; and redemptive power of Divine forgiveness helps to create a community of mutual love that transcends historical divisions of society.

Indeed, so important to the father was this potential property value in a daughter that the law code carefully protected his right to it in case a girl was wronged by a man before marriage.

All fantasy - related player salaries, player usage statistics, historical player performance, stadium weather, lines, odds, betting percentages, betting systems, fantasy trends, fantasy systems, fantasy angles, homerun rate predictions, pitcher strikeout rate predictions, stadium trends, picks, articles, text, hidden text within source code, graphics, user interfaces, visual interfaces, photographs, videos, trademarks, logos, music, sounds, and computer code (collectively, «Content»), including but not limited to the design, structure, selection, coordination, expression, «look and feel» and arrangement of such Content, contained on the Site is owned by the Action Network Group or its licensors, and is protected by U.S. and international intellectual property and proprietary rights.

Baby Milk Action also pointed out that the Assembly adopted the Code as a «minimum requirement», that human rights are meant to be universal and that the Nestlé «protect» marketing strategy is global, hence the need to invoke measures at an international level.

Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI) was founded on 3rd December, 1991 atWardha, Maharashtra.BPNI is a registered, independent, nonprofit, national organization; working towards protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding and appropriate complementary feeding of infants & young children.BPNI acts on the targets of Innocenti Declarations, Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes, and the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding (WHO 2002).

According to the international standards adopted to protect breastfeeding from commercial pressures, including the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Nestlé is required to comply with the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes and subsequent resolutions in all countries of the world, irrespective of their national legislation on this matter.

This Site, including any computer code, design, text, drawings, photographs, graphics, sound recordings and video records, is protected by copyrights, trademarks, and other proprietary rights owned by SCC and / or its licensors, including rights to the selection, coordination, arrangement and enhancement of the materials on the Site.

Since BFHI began, more than 152 countries around the world have implemented the initiative.9 BFHI promotes a multi-level, multi-sector approach which, together with legislation regarding statutory maternity leave and protection of the breastfeeding rights of women in the workplace and enforcement of the Code of marketing of breast milk substitutes, is essential to effectively promote, protect and support breastfeeding.6 Monitoring and re-assessment of BFHI facilities are important as the initiative expands.

The International Code presents governments with another measure to protect the human rights of women and children to the highest attainable standard of health.

As a signatory to the Convention on the Rights of the Child that came into force in 1990, the UK has had a legal, as well as moral, obligation to protect breastfeeding and fully implement the International Code and Resolutions.

Should you allow formula companies to exhibit, sponsor or hand out promotional material and samples your company will be in direct violation of the International Code, a document that was designed to protect a mother's right to informed and unbiased feeding choices, and a baby's right to the highest attainable health.

The Code is an integral tool to help protect babies» rights: enabling families to make infant feeding choices free from commercial influence, with full understanding of what is in their child's best interest, and giving babies the best possible chance to grow, develop and flourish in their critical foundation years.

«Drawing on powers vested by Section 45 (1) of the Constitution, and Section 97a of the Penal Code, the governor signed an order declaring the IMN as an unlawful society in the interest of public order and to protect the rights and freedoms of all persons in Kaduna State, he said.

«With these reforms to our tax code, we are doing everything we can to protect the rights and wallets of families across New York.»

I believe it will take a «Federal Uniform Voting Code» to protect Americans right to vote; and to have their vote counted in hotly contested elections.

«We looked at the human rights code and it appears this is not a protected class, currently,» Levine told the New York Daily News.

Many IST associations have codes of ethics and advocacy programs to ensure that human rights are protected.

They also proposed that research institutions and universities should use open - source software licenses to allow for source - code sharing while protecting the commercial rights to possible innovation spinoffs from research.

The entire contents of the website and the technology underlying, including but not limited to text, graphics, images, audio files, videos, digital downloads, data compilation, or code is copyrighted as a collective work under the United States and other copyright laws, and is the property of WellnessMama.com and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property or proprietary rights.

Despite the fact that prohibition - measures seem to defend women's rights and protect other people from being proselytised by them (women that follow the Islamic dress code), in reality they are turned against them.

The DSC Model Code on Education and Dignity presents a set of recommended policies to schools, districts, and legislators to help end school pushout and protect the human rights to education, dignity, participation and freedom from discrimination.

From blocking unauthorized access to scrambling the underlying code of an e-book, DRM solutions can help protect content and preserve author's right to benefit from their work.

For copies of Works purchased pursuant to TOS granting «the non-exclusive right to keep a permanent copy» of each purchased Work and to «view, use and display [such Works] an unlimited number of times, solely on the [Devices]... and solely for [the purchasers»] personal, non-commercial use», Amazon will not remotely delete or modify such Works from Devices purchased and being used in the U.S unless (a) the user consents to such deletion or modification; (b) the user requests a refund for the work or otherwise fails to pay for the work (e.g., if a credit card issuer declines payment); (c) a judicial or regulatory order requires such deletion or modification; or (d) deletion or modification is reasonably necessary to protect the consumer, the operation of a device or network used for communication (e.g., to remove harmful code embedded within an e-book on a device).

You agree that the Service (along with all text, code, graphics, sounds, screen shots, video clips, data, demos and content therein) and the Products are owned by Humble Bundle and / or its licensors, contain proprietary information and intellectual property rights that are owned by Humble Bundle and / or its licensors, and are protected by applicable U.S. and international intellectual property and other laws and conventions, including but not limited to copyright and trademark, and that you will not use such proprietary information or materials in any way whatsoever except for use of the Service in compliance with these Terms.

This code is also protected by the Irish Wolfhound Foundation's copyright and other intellectual property rights.

A five judge panel of Ontario Court of Appeal holds that the Criminal Code mandatory ban on publication of bail proceedings (when requested by an accused) violates the Charter - protected right to freedom of the press.

In a nutshell, the AG found that, when third country nationals apply for a visa with limited territorial validity («LTV») under Article 25 of the Visa Code with the aim of applying for international protection once they have arrived in a Member State's territory, the Member State's immigration authority should take the circumstances of the applicant into account and assess whether a refusal would lead to an infringement of the applicant's rights as protected by the Charter of Fundamental Rrights as protected by the Charter of Fundamental RightsRights.

But there is nothing in the Code or in its purpose that suggests that Parliament was granting non-unionized employees a «right to the job» or was trying to place unionized and non-unionized employees in the same position: protected from being dismissed without cause.

This Court could find no evidence upon which it could find any abrogation of the Plaintiff's rights as protected by the Code.

In Browne v. Sudbury Integrated Nickel Operations, 2016 HRTO 62 (Hart), the Tribunal held that the Ontario Human Rights Code does not protect the right of a cisgendered or gender conforming man [1] to grow a beard.

Addictions to both drugs or alcohol are considered «disabilities» under the Ontario Human Right's Code (the Code), and anyone with a past, current, or even perceived addiction to drugs or alcohol is protected from discrimination in the workplace.

In a frequently cited decision, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) confirmed that it does not have the power to deal with general allegations of unfairness, and dismissed a human rights complaint on the basis that the applicant had not established a clear link between her termination and a protected ground under the Human Rights Code (the Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) confirmed that it does not have the power to deal with general allegations of unfairness, and dismissed a human rights complaint on the basis that the applicant had not established a clear link between her termination and a protected ground under the Human Rights Code (the rights complaint on the basis that the applicant had not established a clear link between her termination and a protected ground under the Human Rights Code (the Rights Code (the Code).

If passed, the ESA would have a total of 10 protected leaves of absence, in addition to the protection for leaves provided by the Ontario Human Rights Code.

The takeaway from this case for employers is if an employee alleges that his or her rights, as protected by the Ontario Human Rights Code are being violated, then it is likely prudent to seek professional legal arights, as protected by the Ontario Human Rights Code are being violated, then it is likely prudent to seek professional legal aRights Code are being violated, then it is likely prudent to seek professional legal advice.

Notwithstanding the fact that the employee likely did not have the «right» to take the time off to care for his children under the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000, the law is clear that: (a) the ESA establishes certain minimum standards only, and (b) the Human Rights Code does, very clearly, contemplate one's «family status» as a protected ground.

As a Kitchener workplace harassment lawyer, I can protect your rights and work diligently for Human Rights Code compliance at your workrights and work diligently for Human Rights Code compliance at your workRights Code compliance at your workplace.

One of the protected grounds under the Human Rights Code is «family status.»

(4), (5) and (6) of s. 251 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C - 34, relating to abortion on the ground that they contravened protected rights of the foetus.

The Court elided the idea of the rationale for extending human rights protection to those groups identified by the prohibited grounds (which, as we have just seen and as the Court itself noted, is the idea of their vulnerability in virtue of the group characteristic) with the idea of the various contexts in which the Code seeks to protect those so identified as vulnerable, e.g. housing, service provision and employment.

Although homelessness is not a condition protected under the Human Rights Code, race and disability are.

This is one of several failed attempts to protect persons from discrimination by including gender identity as a protected ground under the Canadian Human Rights Act and Criminal Code.

Does this right mean that one who cracks a TPM to access computer code (which is a protected copyrighted work under the Act) is liable even if it is done for a purpose unconnected to an act of copyright infringement?