Sentences with phrase «rights in criminal prosecutions»

He has also represented clients in noteworthy Slayer Statute and property rights disputes, deaths caused by texting while driving, and is an aggressive advocate for the principles set forth in the Virginia Declaration of Rights and United States Bill of Rights in criminal prosecutions.

Not exact matches

The SixthAmendment provides: «In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury.»

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State...

Indeed Robert Francis makes a very strong argument that the Health and Safety Executive is too distant from hospitals and not the right organisation to be focusing on healthcare and criminal prosecutions in these cases.

In a statement, Bharara's office said there was «insufficient evidence to meet the high burden of proof required for a federal criminal civil rights prosecution.»

According to him, although the rights of the girls were violated by the public humiliation, the rights «do not in any way close the door to the criminal prosecution of the act that they allegedly committed.»

Ms. Caproni continued that, while it is «inarguable» that «the public has a right to know about criminal prosecutions,» «criminal cases should be tried in the courtroom and not in the press.»

In addition to discontinuance of Hilton Honors membership, Hilton Honors shall have the right to take appropriate administrative and / or legal action, including, without limitation, criminal prosecution, as it deems necessary in its sole discretioIn addition to discontinuance of Hilton Honors membership, Hilton Honors shall have the right to take appropriate administrative and / or legal action, including, without limitation, criminal prosecution, as it deems necessary in its sole discretioin its sole discretion.

In addition to discontinuance of Hilton Honors membership, Hilton Honors shall have the right to take appropriate administrative and / or legal action, including, without limitation, criminal prosecution, as it deems necessary in its sole discretioIn addition to discontinuance of Hilton Honors membership, Hilton Honors shall have the right to take appropriate administrative and / or legal action, including, without limitation, criminal prosecution, as it deems necessary in its sole discretioin its sole discretion.

In the event that You misuse any trademark, patent, design right or copyright in violation of these Terms, the World Photography Organisation and / or its subsidiaries and / or affiliates and / or associated companies and / or Event Partners will aggressively enforce its intellectual property rights to the fullest extent of the law, including the seeking of criminal prosecutioIn the event that You misuse any trademark, patent, design right or copyright in violation of these Terms, the World Photography Organisation and / or its subsidiaries and / or affiliates and / or associated companies and / or Event Partners will aggressively enforce its intellectual property rights to the fullest extent of the law, including the seeking of criminal prosecutioin violation of these Terms, the World Photography Organisation and / or its subsidiaries and / or affiliates and / or associated companies and / or Event Partners will aggressively enforce its intellectual property rights to the fullest extent of the law, including the seeking of criminal prosecution.

(7) records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information (A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, (B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or to an impartial adjudication, (C) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, (D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a State, local or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled by criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, (E) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or (F) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual; [the law enforcement exemption]

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

There is considerable doubt that the Sixth Amendment itself, as originally drafted by the Framers of the Bill of Rights, contemplated any guarantee other than the right of an accused in a criminal prosecution in a federal court to employ a lawyer to assist in his defense.

But, in most cases of serious criminal charges like this one, either a grand jury probable cause finding, or a preliminary hearing probable cause finding, both made well prior to a trial, will conclusively preclude a malicious prosecution or civil rights lawsuit.

In addition to labour and human rights law, Will has a strong interest in criminal justice, both prosecution and defencIn addition to labour and human rights law, Will has a strong interest in criminal justice, both prosecution and defencin criminal justice, both prosecution and defence.

Although its analysis, like that in Gideon and other earlier cases, suggested that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel should apply to all state criminal prosecutions, Argersinger held only that an indigent defendant is entitled to appointed counsel, even in petty offenses punishable by six months of incarceration or less, if he is likely to be sentenced to incarceration for any time if convicted.

The court still reversed the contempt finding, holding that Markowitz had a Fifth Amendment right not to identify the clients because doing so might expose him to criminal prosecution, but that element doesn't seem to exist in the Cohen situation.

The U.S. Constitution has always played a role in criminal law because it defines important individual rights that must be preserved even in a state prosecution involving a state crime.

«Perhaps the single most important organizing principle in criminal law is the right of an accused not to be forced into assisting in his or her own prosecution: M. Hor, «The Privilege Against Self - Incrimination and Fairness to the Accused», [1993] Singapore J. Legal Stud.

Business Development: Brokering various business dealings that further the diversification of Indian economies Developing and accessing commercial financial programs and services for tribal governments, including tax - exempt offerings and federally - guaranteed housing loans Serving as issuer or underwriter's counsel in tribal bond issuances Ensuring tribal compliance with Bank Secrecy Act and other federal financial regulatory requirements Handling federal and state income, excise, B&O, property and other tax matters for tribes and tribal businesses Chartering tribal business enterprises under tribal, state and federal law Registering and protecting tribal trademarks and copyrights Negotiating franchise agreements for restaurants and retail stores on Indian reservations Custom - tailoring construction contracts for tribes and general contractors Helping secure federal SBA 8 (a) and other contracting preferences for Indian - owned businesses Facilitating contractual relations between tribes and tribal casinos, and gaming vendors Building tribal workers» compensation and self - insurance programs Government Relations: Handling state and federal regulatory matters in the areas of tribal gaming, environmental and cultural resources, workers» compensation, taxation, health care and education Negotiating tribal - state gaming compacts and fuel and cigarette compacts, and inter-local land use and law enforcement agreements Advocacy before the Washington State Gambling Commission, Washington Indian Gaming Association and National Indian Gaming Commission Preparing tribal codes and regulations, including tribal court, commercial, gaming, taxation, energy development, environmental and cultural resources protection, labor & employment, and workers» compensation laws Developing employee handbooks, manuals and personnel policies Advocacy in areas of treaty rights, gaming, jurisdiction, taxation, environmental and cultural resource protection Brokering fee - to - trust and related real estate and jurisdictional transactions Litigation & Appellate Services: Handling complex Indian law litigation, including commercial, labor & employment, tax, land use, treaty rights, natural and cultural resource matters Litigating tribal trust mismanagement claims against the United States, and evaluating tribal and individual property claims under the Indian Claims Limitation Act Defending tribes and tribal insureds from tort claims brought against them in tribal, state and federal courts, including defense tenders pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act Assisting tribal insureds in insurance coverage negotiations, and litigation Representing individual tribal members in tribal and state civil and criminal proceedings, including BIA prosecutions and Indian probate proceedings Assisting tribal governments with tribal, state and federal court appeals, including the preparation of amicus curiae briefs Our Indian law & gaming attorneys collaborate to publish the quarterly «Indian Legal Advisor ``, designed to provide Indian Country valuable information about legal and political developments affecting tribal rights.

In the United States, a public defender is a right guaranteed by the 6th Amendment in criminal prosecutionIn the United States, a public defender is a right guaranteed by the 6th Amendment in criminal prosecutionin criminal prosecutions.

And in the criminal courts, the obvious sanction is to dismiss the prosecution for some abuse of process involving the defendant's human rights.

In this regard, a civil - rights based approach treats sexual violence as a violation of the Criminal Code and human rights law, which allows for both criminal prosecution as well as civil lCriminal Code and human rights law, which allows for both criminal prosecution as well as civil lcriminal prosecution as well as civil lawsuits.

Clients receive support in their initial dealings with regulatory authorities, at formal interviews carried out under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, and at all stages of criminal prosecutions, right through tCriminal Evidence Act, and at all stages of criminal prosecutions, right through tcriminal prosecutions, right through to trial.

«The Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause provides that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him.

The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: «In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial....»

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides in pertinent part: «In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.&raquin pertinent part: «In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.&raquIn all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.»

Because criminal prosecutions take priority, plaintiffs with civil claims — workers, victims of government misconduct, consumers, and others — face severe delays in vindicating their rights.

The Sixth Amendment provides, «In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.»

It is both critical for criminal suspects to assert their right to remain silent under the Constitution's Fifth Amendment, to have a federal criminal lawyer advocating for them early on to work to avoid a prosecution in the first place, and to minimize being behind the eight - ball in defending against federal felony charges.

Examples of such cases are Chandler v Cape Plc [2011] EWHC 951 (QB)(liability of non-employer for exposure to asbestos), Kynixa Ltd v Hynes and others [2008] EWHC 1495 (QB)(claims arising from alleged breaches of restrictive covenants in employment contracts), Romantiek BVBA v Simms [2008] EWHC 3099 (QB) a claim alleging that a public official had committed the tort of misfeasance in public office when discharging a licensing function, OOO and others v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [20011] EWHC 1246 (QB)(claims by young foreign females that they had been trafficked into the UK by foreign nationals for the purpose of slavery and that officers of the Metropolitan Police Force breached their human rights in failing to investigate their complaints adequately or at all) and Mouncher and others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2016] EWHC 1367 (QB)(claims by retired and serving police officers for false imprisonment, misfeasance in public office and malicious prosecution against South Wales Police arising from an investigation by officers of that force into alleged criminal conduct on the part of the claimants during the course of an investigation into a notorious murder in South Wales.

In all criminal prosecutions, every person charged with crime has the right to be informed of the accusation and to confront the accusers and witnesses with other testimony, and to have counsel for defense, and not be compelled to give self - incriminating evidence, or to pay costs, jail fees, or necessary witness fees of the defense, unless found guilty.

The right against self - incrimination prevails in criminal proceedings and provides a ground for refusing to report or cooperate with the prosecution authorities.

Under the 6th Amendment we have very specific rights «In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by...

A person who refuses to testify in criminal proceedings without having the right to do so may be liable to a criminal prosecution and may be required to pay the costs and damages incurred as a result of such refusal (article 176 SCP).

The Reason: The Sixth Amendment states that «in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.»

Justice Ehrcke noted that they would have to testify as witnesses regardless, and there are many criminal prosecutions in the province which could raise the constitutional challenges as a right.

«In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to be confronted with the witnesses against him».

He applied to challenge the order on two grounds: (i) that the effect of the order was to deprive him of his liberty, in breach of Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention); and (ii), that the secretary of state had breached his statutory duty under PTA 2005, s 8 (1) in relation to consideration of criminal prosecution.

To preclude a civil litigant from relitigating an issue previously found against him in a criminal prosecution is less severe than to preclude him from relitigating such an issue in successive civil trials, for there are rigorous safeguards against unjust conviction, including the requirements of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and of a unanimous verdict, the right to counsel, and a record paid for by the state on appeal.

The provision would extend the powers and rights of audience of DCWs by enabling them to conduct: - summary trials in magistrates» courts; - certain proceedings in magistrates» courts, including proceedings relating to offences triable only on indictment by a judge and jury at the crown court; - applications and other proceedings relating to «preventative civil orders» such as anti-social behaviour orders; and - certain proceedings (other than criminal proceedings) assigned to the director of public prosecutions by the attorney general under the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, s 3 (2)(g).

The practice's recent representations include: (i) CONMEBOL in connection with U.S. criminal investigations and prosecutions into allegations of bribery and corruption in the international soccer world; (ii) the Special Committee of Banco BTG Pactual S.A. («BTG Pactual») in an internal investigation of alleged corruption involving its former CEO and other bank executives, in which we found no basis to support the allegations against the Bank and its employees; (iii) two of the largest construction companies in Brazil in potential civil and criminal investigations and litigation involving the Petrobras bribery scandal (Lava Jato), the largest corruption scandal in Latin American history, involving allegations of over $ 2.5 billion in bribes and kickbacks; (iv) the Government of Brazil in a corruption matter involving former senior government officials and multiple jurisdictions; (v) the General Manager of one of the largest energy companies in Central America in connection with allegations of bribery in Guatemala; (vi) a Mexican high - ranking executive for Wal - Mart Stores, Inc. in connection with DOJ and SEC FCPA investigations against Wal - Mart; (vii) a large Argentinean oil company and its owner, one of Argentina's wealthiest individuals, in connection with high - profile DOJ and SEC investigations involving alleged FCPA violations to secure an extension of oil rights in an Argentinean oilfield; (viii) the United State's largest chemical and industrial products companies in an internal investigation of alleged corruption involving its Mexican subsidiary; (ix) the Rosenthal family, one of the most prominent families in Central America, in a number of related criminal matters; and (x) a senior executive of one of Venezuela's largest engineering companies in DOJ investigations into corruption and money laundering involving PdVSA.

She has handled multiple Title IX investigations by the US Department of Education Office for Civil Rights, provided advice in connection with criminal investigations and prosecutions arising from sexual misconduct incidents, and counseled on the interplay of Title IX, the Clery Act, and FERPA.

Through its lawsuit, Twitter claims it has a First Amendment right to use warrant canaries to say whether or not it has received various categories of so - called NSL letters and FISA requests — secret orders that can subject the companies to criminal prosecution if they even disclose the existence of the letters in the first place.

While it is common for attorneys to work in several areas throughout their careers, it is still important to target and focus a resume on a specific area such as criminal law, prosecution, litigation, arbitration, contracts, bankruptcy, civil rights, etc..