Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the
risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the
risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government
policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Your board mandate should address vision, mission, strategy and operational plans; program delivery and operations;
risk identification and management; finances (budgets, investments, use of donations, etc.); government filings and
reporting; values, ethics, reputation and integrity; key
policies and procedures; and communication and accountability to members and stakeholders.
«Tighter global monetary
policy is needed in order to contain inflation pressures and ward off financial stability
risks,» the Basel - based central bank of central banks warned in its most recent annual
report.
Exxon has argued against all the other shareholder proposals as well, including a «
policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity»; a
policy articulating Exxon's «respect for and commitment to the human right to water»; «a
report discussing possible long term
risks to the company's finances and operations posed by the environmental, social and economic challenges associated with the oil sands»; a
report of «known and potential environmental impacts» and «
policy options» to address the impacts of the company's «fracturing operations»; a
report of recommendations on how Exxon can become an «environmentally sustainable energy company»; and adoption of «quantitative goals... for reducing total greenhouse gas emissions.»
Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward - looking statements include, among others, the following: our ability to successfully and profitably market our products and services; the acceptance of our products and services by patients and healthcare providers; our ability to meet demand for our products and services; the willingness of health insurance companies and other payers to cover Cologuard and adequately reimburse us for our performance of the Cologuard test; the amount and nature of competition from other cancer screening and diagnostic products and services; the effects of the adoption, modification or repeal of any healthcare reform law, rule, order, interpretation or
policy; the effects of changes in pricing, coverage and reimbursement for our products and services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and quality metrics issued by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other
risks and uncertainties described in the
Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual
Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly
Reports on Form 10 - Q.
Thirty - three percent of small and midsize U.S. employers surveyed in 2014 by
risk management and insurance brokerage firm Marsh & McLennan
report having a cyber liability
policy installed, up from just 16 percent in 2013.
If you hold your shares in street name, it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors, the vote to approve the amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the vote to approve the amendment and restatement of our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation, and the stockholder proposals requesting: (i) the elimination of supermajority voting requirements, (ii) the adoption of a
policy to consider employee pay ranges when setting CEO compensation, and (iii) a
report on Salesforce's criteria for investing in, operating in and withdrawing from high -
risk regions (Proposals 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in this Proxy Statement).
based in part on their business line performance, and thus presented the potential for excessive
risk taking, the HRC concluded that the emphasis on overall Company performance in compensation decisions, the existence of robust compliance, internal control, disclosure review and
reporting programs and clawback
policies, the Code of Ethics prohibition on, and right to discipline employees for manipulating business goals for compensation purposes and its prohibitions on derivative and hedging transactions in Company common stock, and the Company's stock ownership guidelines provided adequate safeguards that would either prevent or discourage excessive
risk taking.
Meanwhile, the Bank of England's Financial
Policy Committee (FPC) also released its Financial Stability
Report today with thoughts along the same lines, warning that cyber
risk is a strategic priority rather than a narrow technology issue.
The next full update of the Bank's outlook for the economy and inflation, including
risks to the projection, will be published in the Monetary
Policy Report on 15 April 2015.
Other
risks mentioned by the
Report include fluctuations of interest rate and exchange rate; instable oil and commodity prices; deepening credit crisis; raising Sino - Canada trade friction; unfamiliar investment restrictions, laws and
policies; crime and public safety, etc..
Lastly, as noted in BCA's 2014 outlook
report: In a liquidity trap, where interest rates reach the zero boundary, the linkage between monetary
policy and the real economy is asset markets: zero short rates act to subsidize corporate profits, drive up asset prices and encourage
risk - taking.
These factors — many of which are beyond our control and the effects of which can be difficult to predict — include: credit, market, liquidity and funding, insurance, operational, regulatory compliance, strategic, reputation, legal and regulatory environment, competitive and systemic
risks and other
risks discussed in the
risk sections of our 2017 Annual
Report; including global uncertainty and volatility, elevated Canadian housing prices and household indebtedness, information technology and cyber
risk, regulatory change, technological innovation and new entrants, global environmental
policy and climate change, changes in consumer behavior, the end of quantitative easing, the business and economic conditions in the geographic regions in which we operate, the effects of changes in government fiscal, monetary and other
policies, tax
risk and transparency and environmental and social
risk.
A small but growing number of countries now have legal requirements for institutional investors to
report on how their investment
policies and performance are affected by environmental factors, including South Africa and, prospectively, the EU.36 Concern about the
risks of a «carbon bubble» — that highly valued fossil fuel assets and investments could be devalued or «stranded» under future, more stringent climate
policies — prompted G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in April 2015 to ask the Financial Stability Board in Basel to convene an inquiry into how the financial sector can take account of climate - related issues.37
Instead, disagreement about a particular
policy became the main ground for pronouncing him a «security
risk» in the Gray Board
report.
Ensuring all workers are aware of and comply with this
policy and that all hazards,
risks and any injuries are
reported within our defined time frames;
* Women
report difficulties in accessing intermittent monitoring in some obstetric led maternity units due to routine
policy and the individual beliefs or perceptions of
risk from health care providers.
The
policy statement and technical
report provide global recommendations for education and safety related to SIDS
risk reduction.
Although some SIDS experts and
policy - makers endorse pacifier use recommendations that are similar to those of the AAP, 272,273 concerns about possible deleterious effects of pacifier use have prevented others from making a recommendation for pacifier use as a
risk reduction strategy.274 Although several observational studies275, — , 277 have found a correlation between pacifiers and reduced breastfeeding duration, the results of well - designed randomized clinical trials indicated that pacifiers do not seem to cause shortened breastfeeding duration for term and preterm infants.278, 279 The authors of 1 study
reported a small deleterious effect of early pacifier introduction (2 — 5 days after birth) on exclusive breastfeeding at 1 month of age and on overall breastfeeding duration (defined as any breastfeeding), but early pacifier use did not adversely affect exclusive breastfeeding duration.
Three years later and a
report by the chief inspector of borders and immigration has detailed concerns from a number of migrant organisations about the
policy leading to increased homelessness and the
risk of exploitation.
The UK's involvement in Iraq
risks undermining its future efforts towards an ethical foreign
policy and inflaming global insecurity, two critical
reports have concluded.
The defence committee's
report on Russia, triggered by concerns from some commentators that its increasingly confrontational foreign
policy risks a new cold war, makes clear London should maintain its robust approach to Moscow.
Helpfully he had come armed with suggestions for how this might be done: extending the kinds of business models that the ownership commission
reported upon the day after the jobs summit; ecosystem
policy, rather than industrial
policy; a twenty - first century social contract, which would allow individuals to mitigate the
risk in their lives; and a state - backed infrastructure bank.
«In his
report on the financing of Higher Education (HE), Lord Browne has made several recommendations that, if implemented by the government, would put at
risk the key principles in Higher Education — widening participation, fair access and financial equity — that must remain at the heart of Liberal Democrat
policy.
«This
policy risks depleting the stock of social housing further and therefore increasing the housing benefit bill in the longer term,» the
report warned.
But
reports,
policies, and inventions will only help reduce those
risks if campuses everywhere make them part of everyday life in every lab.
The huge
report from the US Committee on Nuclear Energy and Alternative Strategies, for instance, covered virtually every aspect of nuclear power costs,
risks and
policy implications.
«It is likely that very few Americans will be killed directly, suffer radiation sickness, or even have a measurably increased
risk for cancer from an attack,» Peter D. Zimmerman and Cheryl Loeb write in «Dirty Bombs: The Threat Revisited,» a
report published by the Center for Technology and National Security
Policy, National Defense University.
Many of these identified endocrine - disrupting chemicals (EDCs), which include pesticides and substances used in manufacturing a multitude of products, have been
reported to interfere with thyroid hormone function, yet public health
policy does not fully address the
risks to vulnerable populations.
Implementing key
policies and investments in those three systems — from phasing out fossil fuels to stopping deforestation to ramping up energy efficiency — could deliver at least half of the emissions cuts needed by 2030 to lower the
risk of dangerous climate change, said Jeremy Oppenheim, the
report's program director.
«They will need to provide strong examples of how good
policy can drive economic growth and climate
risk reduction together,» the
report says.
The
report recommends that the governing authorities, including research institutions, funders, and regulators, develop and maintain clear
policies and mechanisms for how public engagement will factor into research, ecological
risk assessments, and public
policy decisions about gene drives.
After a postdoc in plant molecular biology at the Rockefeller University, she worked in Washington DC as an AAAS
Risk Policy Fellow at the USDA and then as a study director for several reports on biotechnology and bioterrorism policy at the NAS
Policy Fellow at the USDA and then as a study director for several
reports on biotechnology and bioterrorism
policy at the NAS
policy at the NAS / NRC.
The group's advisory
report was released last month and will be the foundation for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services»
policy recommendations on how physical activity can promote health and reduce the
risk of disease.
The
report recommended prioritizing cannabis research — clinically and in health
policy, health economics, public health and public safety — especially in at -
risk and under - researched populations, such as children and youth, older populations, pregnant women and heavy users.
In a foreword to the
report, David Laws, executive chairman for CentreForum, said: «There is a
risk that this
policy may widen the attainment gap on entry to school, and cut across initiatives such as the Pupil Premium, which aim to narrow this gap.»
In 2004, McCown served as lead author of the commission's bipartisan
report, Teaching at
Risk: A Call to Action, which recommends
policies to overcome existing barriers and make improvement efforts on school issues like low standards.
A Nation at
Risk, National Commission on Excellence in Education, April «
Report of the Task Force on Federal Elementary and Secondary Education
Policy,» Twentieth Century Fund, May 1983
These should include defining the institution's
risk management strategy and
risk appetite and integrating the process for managing
risk into the institution's overall strategic management, planning, systems,
reporting,
policies, values and culture.
It is
policy in the Pittsburgh district to
report violent incidents in the schools to the local news media — even at the
risk of contributing to the community's fears about school safety.
But as recently as the early»80s, there was no comprehensive national education
policy before the landmark
report «A Nation at
Risk» helped set it in motion.
Hot on the heels of the Centre for
Policy's
report on the UK's litigious culture curbing educational trips, October will see teachers and adventurers, travel, legal and safety experts congregate at the annual Stretching Horizons» conference to discuss some of the ways schools can enrich education, mitigate
risk and raise funds for educational journeys with a view to changing lives.
Nevertheless, powerful interest groups were able to use the climate of urgency created by the
report to get their own preferred
policies enacted, even when the
policies were not recommended by
Risk.
Even though it is difficult to attribute the gains to the new retention
policy, since many schools began requiring it, by 2001, 43 percent of 8th graders at moderate
risk reported such attendance.
Just as the publication of A Nation at
Risk caused President Reagan to re-evaluate his education
policies, the 25th anniversary of the landmark
report should give federal policymakers the opportunity to reconsider the current federal approach, one influential lawmaker said last week.
Academic Standards (PDF) Academic and Career Plan (PDF) ADA 504 Notice (PDF) Asbestos Management Plan (PDF) Assessment Information (PDF) ATOD (PDF) Attendance
Policy (PDF) Bullying (PDF) Child Nutrition (PDF) Directory and Yearbook Information (PDF) District Wellness
Policy (PDF) Education for Employment — Career Counseling (PDF) Education Options Available to Resident Children (PDF) Homeless Education Program (PDF) Human Growth and Development (webpage) Indoor Air Quality (PDF) Limited English Proficiency (PDF) Meal Charge
Policy (PDF) Participation (PDF) Public Use of School Facilities (PDF) Possession or Use of Cell Phones (PDF) Program and Curriculum Modifications — Programs for Children At
Risk (PDF) School Accountability
Report (webpage) Special Education (PDF) Special Needs Scholarship Program (PDF) Student Locker Searches (PDF) Student Non-Discrimination and Complaint Procedures (PDF) Student Records (PDF) Suicide Prevention Resources (PDF) Student Privacy — Pupil Records (PDF) Student Privacy — Directory and Yearbook Information (PDF) Title I Family Engagement
Policy (PDF) Title I Professional Qualifications — Teacher (PDF) Title I Professional Qualifications — Teacher Assistant Youth Options Courses (PDF)
Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence (CREDE) Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At -
Risk (CRESPAR) Center for the Study of Teaching and
Policy (CTP) National Center for Early Development and Learning (NCEDL) National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science National Center for Postsecondary Improvement (NCPI) National Consortium for
Policy Research in Education (CPRE) National Research and Development Center on English Learning and Achievement (CELA) National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented (NRC / GT) Research
Reports from the National Research and Development Centers
A
report by Tom Loveless, Director of the Brown Center on Education
Policy at the Brookings Institution, Washington DC, states that «Youngsters who have not mastered whole number arithmetic by the end of 4th grade are at
risk of later becoming remedial students in mathematics» (http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/mathscience/loveless.html) and urges that every student in the nation should receive a thorough grounding in arithmetic.
This
report provides
policy makers with information on state - funded pre-K programs» eligibility
policies and the common
risk factors used to prioritize enrollment.
The DCPS funding formula does differentiate public funding based on the number of students at each grade level and in different special needs categories, including special education, English language learners, and those «at
risk» for academic failure.38 DCPS would not disclose how or if it factors in parental donations when determining school budgets or allocations.39 However, it did
report not having a
policy to equitably redistribute parent donations or to prohibit these additional dollars from being put toward staffing.40