Even more troubling are such theological excurses as this: Jewish monotheism was «generally unthreatening to
Roman paganism.»
You fail to see just how ridiculous it is to hold on so tightly to the bible and the belief in god and the bible and yet your easy dismissal of ancient greek paganism, or
roman paganism, or scandinavian.
Not exact matches
In Europe, Charlemagne, who in 800 A.D. became the first emperor in western Europe, after the collapse of the Western
Roman Empire three centuries earlier and who was a pivotal figure in the Christianization of Europe, issued the Capitulatio de partibus Saxoniae, which prescribed death for Saxons who refused to convert from their native Germanic
paganism to Christianity.
Greek,
Roman, Persian, Assyrian, Sumerian, Egyptian
paganism?
It was in Western Europe, where it faced a much weaker
paganism, was associated with the prestige of
Roman civilization, and, while often favored by civil rulers, did not have to confront a continuously powerful state which controlled all phases of life, that the influence of Jesus was most marked.
Many Modern Pagans attempt to recreate (or at least re-imagine) Ancient Western
paganisms, whether they are Greek,
Roman, Celtic, Egyptian, or Norse.
No, the civilized world or Byzantine Empire (Eastern
Roman Empire) realized the validity of Christianity and the falsehood of
paganism.
Emperor Theodosius I banned
paganism and imposed Trinitarian «Christianity» as the State religion of the
Roman Empire.
This form of evangelism in the early church must be viewed in its cultural context, the
paganism of the
Roman Empire.
A
Roman Emperor, Constantine, passed from
paganism to Christianity.
Jesus is a myth like Apollo and Hercules and Christianity is nothing but a syncretism of Mediterranean
paganism, Egyptian mystery religion, Jewish Essenism, and Grrek and
Roman elements.
When one reads about
Roman pagan religion, particularly the Cybele / Attis cult, one of Rome's most prominent religions and Christianity's biggest competitor, then it's hard to extrapolate what seems to be a condemnation of
paganism and apply it to gay people who are Christians.
It is those Biblical teachings after all, that the
Roman Church killed Christians for being in posession of while they tried to enstate
paganism rituals directly contradicting them, such as Sunday sabbath and Solstice birthday, both of which directly contradict Biblical teachings.
What the so called «Christian church,» which has been contaminated by
paganism from the times of the
roman empire, says is irrelevant.
This all came from the
Roman Catholic church, which got the idea of a priest from
paganism.
First, concerned about the influence of
paganism upon the
Roman Christians, Paul sees homosexual expression as a result of idolatry, but he does not claim that such practices are the cause of God's wrath.
The Anglo - Saxon invasions had reduced to
paganism much of the former
Roman Britain.
That process was rampant back in
Roman times (incorporation of
paganism e.g. Christmas celebration) and continues to the present day (Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses).
Later, in the wake of large - scale Irish immigration, school texts began slandering
Roman Catholicism, describing it as an anti-Christian form of
paganism and idolatry.