Sentences with phrase «rossk value argument»

Buffet has been recycling the lack of intrinsic value argument since 2014, when he first dismissed Bitcoin as «a mirage» on CNBC.
I can't say I understand the Z of Z theory, or the theoretical approach you are taking, but I'm interested — as one who values argument (from arg — to shine, build up a shared «shine» — initially argument had positive connotation) I am impressed by the gap separating the «good» that we know and can say, and yet are unable to practice.
From the perspective of our findings, either option seems plausible, and depends on winning the values argument with a relatively small number of voters.
The form of argument in this presentation has emphasized several specific points: first, that the Asian values argument, as a challenge to the implementation of constitutional democracy, is exaggerated and fails to account for the richness of values discourse in the East Asian region - local values do not provide a justification for harsh authoritarian practices; second, that the cultural prerequisites arguments fail because they ignore the discursive processes for value development and they are tautological, excessively deterministic and ignore the importance of human agency it, therefore, makes little sense to take an entry test for constitutional democracy; third, the difficulties of importing Western communitarian ideas into an East Asian authoritarian environment without adequate liberal constitutional safeguards; fourth, the positive role of constitutionalism in constructing empowering conversations in modern democratic development and as a venue for values discourse; fifth, the importance, especially in a cross-cultural context, of indigenization of constitutionalism through local institutional embodiment; and sixth, the value of extending research focused on the positive engendering or enabling function of constitutionalism to the developmental context in general and East Asia in particular.
If you take at face value the argument that his claims were «bluster», the implications are still worrying.
You would be better off getting a hold of either a Sport, Willys Wheeler, or Rubicon as the value argument works for them.
As Jake points out, it's hard to make a value argument for this Turbo S.
There is a slight value argument going for Lexus with its $ 84,440 price tag, which undercuts the $ 94,100 M5 and $ 110,700 RS 7.
It represents the least expensive way to pick up any new Lexus sedan, but at $ 38,000 before taxes and delivery, it's tough to make the value argument when you're staring down non-luxury vehicles that can arrive on your driveway with much of its ride quality and way more luxury and safety options and doo - dads for much less money.
Still the TL remains an attractive all - wheel drive sedan that has a value argument with this loaded TL SH - AWD Advance stickering at $ 46,280, while a BMW 535i xDrive starts at $ 57,400 and an Audi A6 with the supercharged V6 carries a base price of $ 50,400.
Size wise, it matches up favorably with the Audi A5 Cabriolet and Lexus IS Convertible, but those cars cost substantially more, giving Buick an even stronger value argument (even if it doesn't have the same brand cachet).
Do you think that overall warming can be proved by a mean - value argument, or do you think that all the dynamics are necessary?
Even the value argument falls flat, as the GX70 undercuts the superior Asus G750 by only $ 100, and even MSI's own GE70 (which has a much quicker Intel quad) is just $ 150 more.
I hope the reader of these articles will become aware of the inherent value of group therapy as a treatment modality and not get caught up in an economic value argument.
The beauty of the «discount broker» business model is that it not only eliminates much of the need for prospecting (which is the main impetus for it), it also inherently attempts to give the consumer the impression that there is an obvious value argument for selecting the «discount broker»!
Ross continued with what he must regard as more of his value argument with: ``... I summarized their expectations by asking if they felt it reasonable to expect a highly experienced broker who is confident in his self - worth and truly cares about his clients, to accept an over-priced, minimum term listing of a sub-standard property owned by someone who doesn't seem to value loyalty or expertise, and with a heavily discounted commission rate.»
If you spend the best part of your time talking about how much you charge, then that is your best value argument, by your own admission!
Consider what Ross Wilson has said in the subject article that he must feel reinforced his value argument: ``... Consequently, I prepared a detailed CMA and to save them time, prepared most of the listing documentation in advance.»
The Competition Act has an extensive section on Price Maintenance which, in part, protects against the discrimination of suppliers due to any ``,,, low price policy...», As we get deeper and deeper into the realm of discount real estate services, it becomes all the more in the public interest, that we're absolutely clear regarding what we can say and can't say to defend our respective value arguments.
You pretentiously infer a claim to offer better value than those whom you disdain (therein lies your alleged discount) without ever explaining your own value argument — beyond lamenting the unspecified charges of your competitors.
Conversely, a brokerage who may want to argue in favour of charging a commission that is on the higher side, doesn't have as easy a task communicating their value, because their value argument involves a technical understanding of the business, and we may wonder how we'll stand with the Competition Bureau of Canada for having done so.

Not exact matches

In other words, give your employees a pro-CSR argument that is grounded in their own values and beliefs.
Before this starts to sound like the annual lecture from management — perhaps you're one of those corporate employees forced to sleepwalk through an intranet quiz once in a while to prove to your higher - ups that you're familiar with the company's code of conduct — consider DeMars's argument for the value of the ethical office from a personal standpoint: «In order to live happily and at peace with ourselves, we have to live in ways that are congruent with our morals,» she argues.
«Retailers should brace for a backlash... The more people rely on these points and closer they are to value, the more an argument for lots of notice and some rules about convertibility sound sensible.»
Once you understand what the market is paying, you need to build an argument for why you offer create more value for the business than they expect in an entry - level hire, said behavioral scientist Matt Wallaert, co-founder of fair - pay site GetRaised.
There's an argument to be made that consumers will keep buying iPhones in droves regardless of cost because they represent value, but it's equally possibly the new transparency is going to scare some people off.
When the stock took off, eventually valuing the company at nearly $ 15 billion, that second argument became the prevailing wisdom.
If that's the case, there is an argument that the value is zero (if you consider the very moment of its inception), but the answer could also be «hundreds of dollars» based on its value in the market that same day.
In fact, there's an argument to be made — as Dennis Berman does at the Wall Street Journal — that the Verizon bid for AOL says more about Verizon's difficulties than it does about any intrinsic value that its target might have.
She reiterated Trump's argument that the NFL protests, which began more than a year ago when 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick sat during the anthem in protest of police brutality, «disparage [s] the brave men and women in uniform» and American values more broadly.
Eric's argument, aside from not making sense, absolutely ignores time value of money.
They have accepted that Bitcoin's code is strong, and arguments that Bitcoin has no «real» value are waning.
For a while now our focus has been on relative value and there is very little argument that, after the first quarter price collapse, a whole lot of risk has been taken out of bitcoin, ether, Ripple and thousands of others.
Admittedly, one could make the same argument about gold, but gold has been widely accepted by humankind as a thing of value for more than two - and - a-half thousand years — compared to less than a decade for bitcoin.
If you restate his argument in an uncharitable way, he is saying that the solution for the problem of excluding non-accredited investors in value appreciation is not to let them participate in private markets, but instead to suffer them to populate an earlier public market for private investors seeking liquidity.
It's a good argument for shareholder value.
Absent additional justification, the cost - savings argument comes across as justification for management empire - building, not value creation.
So where does the business ethics argument come from that it is indeed taxable by the state if it has no real value to the state?
The argument for keeping it is «it may go up in value and you'll regret that later.»
Buffett has also wielded the bubble argument against Bitcoin, as well as stating that BTC can not be valued because «it's not a value - producing asset.»
There is a wild card in the price of gold, though: China (John Burbank made that argument at the Value Investor Congress in Pasadena).
That argument simply does not hold water as the under - funded amount, $ 2.6 billion, represents the present value of all future obligations less the value of the assets EK's dedicates to the pension obligations.
«Rob's Arguments in Favor of Value Investing Actually Make a Lot of Sense In a Way That Should Make Any Rational Buy - and - Holder Uncomfortable.»
In other words, your product's strategic value comprises the reasons and arguments buyers give to senior management and others in the company as to why the product should be purchased.
One argument against this strategy is that value investing is investing, it is not trading over a short period of time, looking for the daily movements that take place in a stock's value.
The NOI approach is based upon the argument that the marketplace values the company as a whole for an offered threat skin.
Another argument for burning cryptocurrencies is that a newly created token actually has value because of it.
If you start questioning why stocks should increase in value over time, then you can get into some esoteric arguments.
I also think that the leverage argument is minor or not a largely attributable value / parameter to differentiate between stocks and real estate.
The argument comes from veteran value investor David Winters, portfolio manager of Wintergreen Fund, who in his latest letter to shareholders says that the typical S&P 500 index fund incurred expenses of over 4.3 % in 2016.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z