Buffet has been recycling the lack of intrinsic
value argument since 2014, when he first dismissed Bitcoin as «a mirage» on CNBC.
I can't say I understand the Z of Z theory, or the theoretical approach you are taking, but I'm interested — as one who
values argument (from arg — to shine, build up a shared «shine» — initially argument had positive connotation) I am impressed by the gap separating the «good» that we know and can say, and yet are unable to practice.
From the perspective of our findings, either option seems plausible, and depends on winning
the values argument with a relatively small number of voters.
The form of argument in this presentation has emphasized several specific points: first, that the Asian
values argument, as a challenge to the implementation of constitutional democracy, is exaggerated and fails to account for the richness of values discourse in the East Asian region - local values do not provide a justification for harsh authoritarian practices; second, that the cultural prerequisites arguments fail because they ignore the discursive processes for value development and they are tautological, excessively deterministic and ignore the importance of human agency it, therefore, makes little sense to take an entry test for constitutional democracy; third, the difficulties of importing Western communitarian ideas into an East Asian authoritarian environment without adequate liberal constitutional safeguards; fourth, the positive role of constitutionalism in constructing empowering conversations in modern democratic development and as a venue for values discourse; fifth, the importance, especially in a cross-cultural context, of indigenization of constitutionalism through local institutional embodiment; and sixth, the value of extending research focused on the positive engendering or enabling function of constitutionalism to the developmental context in general and East Asia in particular.
If you take at face
value the argument that his claims were «bluster», the implications are still worrying.
You would be better off getting a hold of either a Sport, Willys Wheeler, or Rubicon as
the value argument works for them.
As Jake points out, it's hard to make
a value argument for this Turbo S.
There is a slight
value argument going for Lexus with its $ 84,440 price tag, which undercuts the $ 94,100 M5 and $ 110,700 RS 7.
It represents the least expensive way to pick up any new Lexus sedan, but at $ 38,000 before taxes and delivery, it's tough to make
the value argument when you're staring down non-luxury vehicles that can arrive on your driveway with much of its ride quality and way more luxury and safety options and doo - dads for much less money.
Still the TL remains an attractive all - wheel drive sedan that has
a value argument with this loaded TL SH - AWD Advance stickering at $ 46,280, while a BMW 535i xDrive starts at $ 57,400 and an Audi A6 with the supercharged V6 carries a base price of $ 50,400.
Size wise, it matches up favorably with the Audi A5 Cabriolet and Lexus IS Convertible, but those cars cost substantially more, giving Buick an even stronger
value argument (even if it doesn't have the same brand cachet).
Do you think that overall warming can be proved by a mean -
value argument, or do you think that all the dynamics are necessary?
Even
the value argument falls flat, as the GX70 undercuts the superior Asus G750 by only $ 100, and even MSI's own GE70 (which has a much quicker Intel quad) is just $ 150 more.
I hope the reader of these articles will become aware of the inherent value of group therapy as a treatment modality and not get caught up in an economic
value argument.
The beauty of the «discount broker» business model is that it not only eliminates much of the need for prospecting (which is the main impetus for it), it also inherently attempts to give the consumer the impression that there is an obvious
value argument for selecting the «discount broker»!
Ross continued with what he must regard as more of
his value argument with: ``... I summarized their expectations by asking if they felt it reasonable to expect a highly experienced broker who is confident in his self - worth and truly cares about his clients, to accept an over-priced, minimum term listing of a sub-standard property owned by someone who doesn't seem to value loyalty or expertise, and with a heavily discounted commission rate.»
If you spend the best part of your time talking about how much you charge, then that is your best
value argument, by your own admission!
Consider what Ross Wilson has said in the subject article that he must feel reinforced
his value argument: ``... Consequently, I prepared a detailed CMA and to save them time, prepared most of the listing documentation in advance.»
The Competition Act has an extensive section on Price Maintenance which, in part, protects against the discrimination of suppliers due to any ``,,, low price policy...», As we get deeper and deeper into the realm of discount real estate services, it becomes all the more in the public interest, that we're absolutely clear regarding what we can say and can't say to defend our respective
value arguments.
You pretentiously infer a claim to offer better value than those whom you disdain (therein lies your alleged discount) without ever explaining your own
value argument — beyond lamenting the unspecified charges of your competitors.
Conversely, a brokerage who may want to argue in favour of charging a commission that is on the higher side, doesn't have as easy a task communicating their value, because
their value argument involves a technical understanding of the business, and we may wonder how we'll stand with the Competition Bureau of Canada for having done so.
Not exact matches
In other words, give your employees a pro-CSR
argument that is grounded in their own
values and beliefs.
Before this starts to sound like the annual lecture from management — perhaps you're one of those corporate employees forced to sleepwalk through an intranet quiz once in a while to prove to your higher - ups that you're familiar with the company's code of conduct — consider DeMars's
argument for the
value of the ethical office from a personal standpoint: «In order to live happily and at peace with ourselves, we have to live in ways that are congruent with our morals,» she argues.
«Retailers should brace for a backlash... The more people rely on these points and closer they are to
value, the more an
argument for lots of notice and some rules about convertibility sound sensible.»
Once you understand what the market is paying, you need to build an
argument for why you offer create more
value for the business than they expect in an entry - level hire, said behavioral scientist Matt Wallaert, co-founder of fair - pay site GetRaised.
There's an
argument to be made that consumers will keep buying iPhones in droves regardless of cost because they represent
value, but it's equally possibly the new transparency is going to scare some people off.
When the stock took off, eventually
valuing the company at nearly $ 15 billion, that second
argument became the prevailing wisdom.
If that's the case, there is an
argument that the
value is zero (if you consider the very moment of its inception), but the answer could also be «hundreds of dollars» based on its
value in the market that same day.
In fact, there's an
argument to be made — as Dennis Berman does at the Wall Street Journal — that the Verizon bid for AOL says more about Verizon's difficulties than it does about any intrinsic
value that its target might have.
She reiterated Trump's
argument that the NFL protests, which began more than a year ago when 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick sat during the anthem in protest of police brutality, «disparage [s] the brave men and women in uniform» and American
values more broadly.
Eric's
argument, aside from not making sense, absolutely ignores time
value of money.
They have accepted that Bitcoin's code is strong, and
arguments that Bitcoin has no «real»
value are waning.
For a while now our focus has been on relative
value and there is very little
argument that, after the first quarter price collapse, a whole lot of risk has been taken out of bitcoin, ether, Ripple and thousands of others.
Admittedly, one could make the same
argument about gold, but gold has been widely accepted by humankind as a thing of
value for more than two - and - a-half thousand years — compared to less than a decade for bitcoin.
If you restate his
argument in an uncharitable way, he is saying that the solution for the problem of excluding non-accredited investors in
value appreciation is not to let them participate in private markets, but instead to suffer them to populate an earlier public market for private investors seeking liquidity.
It's a good
argument for shareholder
value.
Absent additional justification, the cost - savings
argument comes across as justification for management empire - building, not
value creation.
So where does the business ethics
argument come from that it is indeed taxable by the state if it has no real
value to the state?
The
argument for keeping it is «it may go up in
value and you'll regret that later.»
Buffett has also wielded the bubble
argument against Bitcoin, as well as stating that BTC can not be
valued because «it's not a
value - producing asset.»
There is a wild card in the price of gold, though: China (John Burbank made that
argument at the
Value Investor Congress in Pasadena).
That
argument simply does not hold water as the under - funded amount, $ 2.6 billion, represents the present
value of all future obligations less the
value of the assets EK's dedicates to the pension obligations.
«Rob's
Arguments in Favor of
Value Investing Actually Make a Lot of Sense In a Way That Should Make Any Rational Buy - and - Holder Uncomfortable.»
In other words, your product's strategic
value comprises the reasons and
arguments buyers give to senior management and others in the company as to why the product should be purchased.
One
argument against this strategy is that
value investing is investing, it is not trading over a short period of time, looking for the daily movements that take place in a stock's
value.
The NOI approach is based upon the
argument that the marketplace
values the company as a whole for an offered threat skin.
Another
argument for burning cryptocurrencies is that a newly created token actually has
value because of it.
If you start questioning why stocks should increase in
value over time, then you can get into some esoteric
arguments.
I also think that the leverage
argument is minor or not a largely attributable
value / parameter to differentiate between stocks and real estate.
The
argument comes from veteran
value investor David Winters, portfolio manager of Wintergreen Fund, who in his latest letter to shareholders says that the typical S&P 500 index fund incurred expenses of over 4.3 % in 2016.