Sentences with phrase «rules of court project»

«The criminal rules working committee will proceed with the final subject areas in accordance with its mandate under the Rules of Court Project, but we thought it important to make the legal community aware of the settled policy positions in connection with challenge for cause proceedings even though it may take some time for the positions to be implemented in rule form.»

Not exact matches

The state's environment minister has picked three legal professionals to conduct a review into the Environmental Protection Authority, in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling on the Roe 8 highway project last month.

That said, the vast majority of British Columbians — including one - third who currently oppose the project — say a court ruling that its provincial government does not have the constitutional authority to block the project would be enough to give in and allow the pipeline to be twinned.

The Supreme Court's refusal to hear the company's appeal of the 2nd Circuit's ruling does not necessarily kill the project.

Will the Federal Court of Appeal rule against the project's approval?

The Court of Appeals also blocked a proposed shopping mall near the New York Mets» home at Citi Field, ruling that developers of the proposed Willets West project needed expressed consent from state legislators and the governor's office before moving forward.

New York University's plan to build about two million square feet of new facilities in Greenwich Village is in jeopardy after a court ruled that at least some of the project requires state legislation.

A recent appeals court ruling in a case that grew out of PSEG Long Island's expansion of an electrical substation on Old Stone Highway in Amagansett, represents a mixed decision for East Hampton Town, which had sought to hold the utility provider to local zoning laws that would have required planning board review of the project.

By Sean Ryan Developers stand to lose no matter which way the state Supreme Court rules in a case prompted by a condominium project in the town of Pacific.

Also, FDA clears the party drug ecstasy for post-traumatic stress disorder clinical trials, and U.S. courts rule that the federal government must consider the impacts of major energy projects on climate change.

In the Supreme Court ruling on a case that aimed to stop the project, the top Israeli judges noted that during the planning period, «no one raised any claim, on even one occasion, that the planning procedures violated the sanctity of the site.»

On the eve of a court ruling that could determine the fate of the Thirty Meter Telescope in Hawaii, public support for the stalled $ 1.4 billion project has never been stronger.

The project is based on Laura Kaplan's book «The Story of Jane: The Legendary Underground Feminist Abortion Service,» which follows women who provided abortion services in the years before 1973's Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion.

In March of this year, shortly after the Peter Jennings Project conference, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, ruling that prosecution of the Tunkhannock teens was «in retaliation for [the plaintiffs»] exercise of her constitutional rights not to attend the education program,» effectively ending prosecution of the case before it began.

The unanimous Dec. 19 ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court came in an ongoing effort to figure out how to finish hundreds of building projects even though the state agency overseeing them, the New Jersey Schools...

In February, a High Court judge ruled that the the decision to axe projects in six local authority areas was «unlawful» because of a lack of consultation.

The ruling came from a U.S. appeals court who said that the project is considered «fair use» of published material under copyright law.

The court ruling involved new federal coal leases in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming and Montana that expanded projects holding some 2 billion tons of coal.

Thats because while the courts ruling doesn't end coal expansion, it does potentially push the reset button — a death knell for dozens of coal projects hanging by a financial thread.

«In the ruling, the judges held that FERC «must either quantify and consider the project's downstream carbon emissions or explain in more detail why it can not do so,»» Revesz said, adding: «The court further explained that FERC should either use the social cost of carbon to monetize the climate effects associated with those emissions or explain why it chooses not to do so.»

A California high court ruling has opened up the state's $ 64 - billion high - speed project to a flood of legal challenges from environmentalist opponents, the Los Angles Times reported Monday.

The Guateng High Court in Pretoria ruled against the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA), which was seeking an urgent interdict to stop the 27 mainly wind and solar projects concluding deals with state utility Eskom.

After a Massachusetts court sided with a group of teenagers by ruling the state had failed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, [55] Marc Morano — executive director of CFACT's ClimateDepot project — claimed today's youth are being indoctrinated by the environmental movement: [56]

A Massachusetts state court in 2016 ruled against putting the cost of the project into electric distribution rates.

Pursuant to Clean Air Act § 307 (b)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 7607 (b)(1), Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and D.C. Circuit Rule 15, Air Alliance Houston, California Communities Against Toxics, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Integrity Project, Hoosier Environmental Council, Louisiana Bucket Brigade, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ohio Citizen Action, and Sierra Club (collectively, «Petitioners») hereby petition this Court for review of the 2 final action taken by Respondents U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Administrator Scott Pruitt in the attached memorandum from William L. Wehrum, dated January 25, 2018 (Attachment 1), and in the Federal Register notice published at 83 Fed.

A stay ruling would effectively halt any further work on the projects pending the outcome of the Divisional Court appeal (of the Renewable Energy Approvals for the K2, St. Columban and Armow wind projects) which will be heard on November 17, 18 and 19, 2014.

At Citizen Media Law Project, Sam Bayard criticizes the ruling for confusing «the court's obligation to credit factual allegations with its duty to determine whether the alleged facts state a cause of action.»

Additional coverage of the trial court's ruling in this case can be accessed via Citizen Media Law Project, «Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions,» and law professor Eric Goldman's «Technology & Marketing Law Blog.&rcourt's ruling in this case can be accessed via Citizen Media Law Project, «Internet Library of Law and Court Decisions,» and law professor Eric Goldman's «Technology & Marketing Law Blog.&rCourt Decisions,» and law professor Eric Goldman's «Technology & Marketing Law Blog.»

In a case brought by the Public Law Project, the Court ruled unanimously that the test was outside the scope of powers granted by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 because it introduced a criterion which had «nothing to do with need».

LawToolBox is an all - in - one court rules provider, custom deadline template provider, and deadline management system that offers solutions for law firms and legal departments to automatically calculate deadlines for matters or projects based on the rules of civil procedure for state and federal courts in all 50 states.

The BC Supreme Court and Canadian Federal Court of Appeals have yet to rule on ten First Nation lawsuits that could still quash the project.

The Model Penal Code: Sentencing project provides guidance on some of the most important issues that courts, corrections systems, and policymakers are facing today, including the general purposes of the sentencing system; rules governing sentence severity — including sentences of incarceration, community supervision, and economic penalties; the elimination of mandatory minimum penalties; mechanisms for combating racial and ethnic disparities in punishment; instruments of prison population control; victims» rights in the sentencing process; the sentencing of juvenile offenders in adult courts; the creation of judicial powers to review many collateral consequences of conviction; and many issues having to do with judicial sentencing discretion, sentencing commissions, sentencing guidelines, and appellate sentence review.

«This court ruling all but guarantees increased uncertainty for natural resource projects in Canada and a potential increase in cost for economic development across the country,» states Ravina Bains, study author and associate director of aboriginal policy studies at the Fraser Institute, in the release.

Trillium claims «Ontario unlawfully deprived it of a lucrative offshore wind - powered electric generation project, for an improper political purpose, specifically an electoral purpose,» according to the appeal court's Nov. 12 ruling in Trillium Power Wind Corp. v. Ontario (Natural Resources).

Established new precedent in North Carolina by obtaining favorable ruling from the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals holding that no implied warranty claims could be brought against manufacturer of component parts incorporated into construction project.

Recently, the 2nd U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in Google's favor, finding that the project was fair use under copyright -LSB-...]

The other winners were: Legal Aid Newcomer — Tom Royston, Garden Court North; Legal Aid Barrister — Philip Rule, No5 Chambers; Family Private (inc Mediation)-- Mary Shaw, David Gray Solicitors; Family Public — Sheila Donn, Philcox Gray Solicitors; Social & Welfare — Stuart Luke, Bhatia Best; Public Law — Keith Lomax, Minton Morrill Solicitors; Criminal Defence — Graeme Hydari, Hodge, Jones & Allen; Children's Rights — Solange Valdez - Symonds, Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens / Migrant Resource Centre; Legal Aid Firm / Not - for - profit Agency — Community Law Partnership; and Access to Justice through IT — Advicenow, Law for Life.

In the days following the decision, Robert and Elin gave the interviews linked below to explain the significance of the Court's ruling overturning the approvals of the Northern Gateway Pipeline Project.

Andrew is one of the architects of the New Zealand High Court discovery rules and has over 15 years of experience managing and advising on discovery projects for law firms, government agencies and corporate organisations.

In what will be the first of a series of similar legal actions, the project will be asking the court to rule that the chimp has the legal right to bodily liberty and to order her released from her cage and moved to a cage-less sanctuary.

In a recent decision, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled in favour of the plaintiff for materials and money supplied for a variety of construction projects.

At para 20 for example, he states «The Attorney General intends to encourage this Court to adopt «clear, consistent and predictable rules and processes to facilitate the consideration of resource development projects in the public interest in a manner that respects section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.»

Firstly, the Supreme Court heard the appeal by the Public Law Project in the residence test case and unanimously ruled against the government on the issue of whether the proposed residence test was ultra vires the enabling statute.

Ten years later, a federal appeals court — the Second Circuit court of appeals — just recently ruled that the project does not violate copyright laws and is considered fair use under copyright law and does not infringe on the rights of its authors.

Resulted in a favorable ruling by Justice Souter of the United States Supreme Court which permitted the project to proceed.

After many years in the courts, a federal appeals court recently ruled that the project is fully protected by fair use and does not infringe on the copyrights of authors.

This morning, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Gitxaała Nation and all of the other parties who brought legal challenges to the Northern Gateway Pipeline Project.

After hearing from representatives of the Provincial Court Rules Committee at the Provincial Court level and meeting with the BC Supreme Court Family Law Committee, the group concluded it could best contribute by pursuing a project that covered families with legal issues under the exclusive jurisdiction of the BC Supreme Court (for example, property issues).

Subsequently, the Ministry of Justice funded a project designed to explore the processes by which experts are appointed in light of the new rules and to develop an understanding of the contribution experts make to just and timely decisions in the family court.

«As the Supreme Court and the Advisory Commission began to develop the rules and procedure for our pilot project, there was no definitive overview of the other states that have gone before us in implementing a business cCourt and the Advisory Commission began to develop the rules and procedure for our pilot project, there was no definitive overview of the other states that have gone before us in implementing a business courtcourt.