Sentences with phrase «rules of court affecting»

Roland Otaru spoke with newsmen on how the ruling of the court affected him, «We are affected by the ruling of the court because we feel that our client was not served properly.

Not exact matches

Some would be directly affected by the policy, which the government can't enforce because of federal appeals court rulings against it.
No worries; we should start to learn Thursday morning, which I've taken to calling Health Care Decision Day, how the court's biggest ruling of the term will affect 18 percent of the U.S. GDP.
The Committee also expressed concern about the «potential extinguishment» of Indigenous peoples» land rights and that, «despite favourable rulings of the Supreme Court», governments continue to impose unwanted decisions affecting Indigenous peoples» use of their lands and territories.
I do not yet know what all of Levin's proposed Liberty Amendments are — apparently, there is a new crack at Congressional term limits, which I am iffy about, an amendment for Supreme Court decisions to be expunged by 60 % of Congress or the States, which I am very iffy about, one providing Supreme Court term limits, which I am cool with, one requiring bureaucracy - ordered rule - changes to be subject to Congressional approval when they affect the economy by a certain amount, which I am also.
This would mean, for instance, that participants in an economic transaction are bound to halt their activity whenever any one of them or any affected individual objects to it, or a criminal court judge is bound to halt the trial's proceedings if the accused dissents from a specific rule of the judicial system.
On May 20, 1996, in Romer v. Evans, the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment is totally without a rational basis, and is «born of animosity toward the class of persons affected
If any court of law, having the jurisdiction to decide on this matter, rules that any provision of these Official Rules is invalid or unenforceable, then that provision will be removed from the Official Rules without affecting the rest of the Trules that any provision of these Official Rules is invalid or unenforceable, then that provision will be removed from the Official Rules without affecting the rest of the TRules is invalid or unenforceable, then that provision will be removed from the Official Rules without affecting the rest of the TRules without affecting the rest of the Terms.
Since the current electoral system is the same to all candidates, and all candidates agreed to these electoral rules, it is better to talk about the «particularities» of the system and how these affect candidates; in fact all of the candidates try to use those rules to their advantage (by courting swing states, etc.).
In Kuric v Slovenia, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that once legal residency is established, the right to continue living in a country is not affected by the change in the legal status of either the country of origin or of residence.
The Silver ruling will not affect the federal corruption trials later this year of nine former associates of Gov. Andrew Cuomo, including Cuomo's former top aide, on bribery and bid - rigging because those trials will take place after the Supreme Court's McDonnell ruling.
Commenting on the lawsuit, Mr. Adom Otchere remarked that «the courts, historically, will not rule to affect the higher expectations of society.
The nation's highest court left in place a lower court ruling halting President Obama's executive action, which would have affected as many as 4 million illegal immigrants, many of whom are parents of legal citizens, granting them work permits and deferred deportation.
Had the court ruled broadly against independent commissions, it could have affected district maps in Idaho, Montana and Washington, which also use forms of independent commissions to draw districts.
The Silver ruling will not affect the federal corruption trials later this year of nine former associates of Governor Cuomo, including Cuomo's former top aide, on bribery and bid rigging, because those trials will take place after the Supreme Court's McDonnell ruling.
But one of the good things about our judiciary is that, however many people march, it will not affect the supreme court's ruling «by one comma».
«The extent to which the court should err towards inclusiveness in an action inevitably depends on the facts but in this case the court finds that Mr Corbyn is a member of the Labour Party who is particularly affected and particularly interested in the proper construction of the rules, and his interest in that regard is of a significantly different quality than that of other members,» she added.
The court gave the judgment in a case brought before it by the Electoral Commission, which said it disagreed with the ruling of the High Court in favour of Dr. Nduom, and wanted the Supreme Court to quash it, and also make a determination that will affect all other suits relating to the disqualificacourt gave the judgment in a case brought before it by the Electoral Commission, which said it disagreed with the ruling of the High Court in favour of Dr. Nduom, and wanted the Supreme Court to quash it, and also make a determination that will affect all other suits relating to the disqualificaCourt in favour of Dr. Nduom, and wanted the Supreme Court to quash it, and also make a determination that will affect all other suits relating to the disqualificaCourt to quash it, and also make a determination that will affect all other suits relating to the disqualification.
Any provision of these rules that is adjudged to be invalid or otherwise rendered inoperative by a court of competent jurisdiction shall not affect the validity of any other provision of these rules.
Overview of Lesson Plan: In this lesson, students analyze how education in America affects it youth and the nation by assessing a variety of ways in which American courts and communities are dealing with the unanimous Supreme Court ruling to end «separate but equal» education.
How, exactly, the Supreme Court's Monday ruling in the closely watched Trinity Lutheran case could affect school vouchers and their ability to expand into new states was the source of much debate this week.
Iowa recently passed an Act 10 - inspired law with similar policies affecting public - sector workers and their unions.1 Other states and members of Congress are considering enacting such policies, and with its ruling on Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), the U.S. Supreme Court may act to weaken public - sector unions and teachers» ability to collectively bargain.2
While the case has received national attention and previous rulings have set legal precedent, this particular Supreme Court decision will not affect other suits working their way through the court system, said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of RichCourt decision will not affect other suits working their way through the court system, said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richcourt system, said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond.
Yesterday's ruling was not unexpected, as Judge Cooper had telegraphed some of his thinking when in late January he ruled against a motion for a temporary injunction in the case and also denied the school boards» request to deposit funds with the court instead of paying them to charter schools in the affected Florida counties.
Finally, if you don't know and follow the proper procedures and rules in court, it could affect the outcome of your case.
If, for example, the company plans to announce earnings or expects a major court ruling, these events will affect the implied volatility of options that expire that same month.
Washington, DC — In a federal court ruling handed down today, the Cook County, IL, pet sale ordinance scheduled to take effect October 1 has been delayed pending the outcome of a lawsuit filed by several of the affected store owners.
The state of Michigan, like Ohio, has been unable to address this problem to date due to the United States Constitutional limitation, and a Supreme Court ruling in 1992, on states affecting interstate commerce.
However, such an interpretation could be rejected by the European Court of Justice, who could consider that extending the common rules to a (future) third country does not, sensu stricto, «affect» them nor «alter» their scope.
Regarding the impact of the rule, the Court said that it was for the national court to decide if it affected some beliefs more than others, but it was not inconceivable that they might conclude that it did (paragraphCourt said that it was for the national court to decide if it affected some beliefs more than others, but it was not inconceivable that they might conclude that it did (paragraphcourt to decide if it affected some beliefs more than others, but it was not inconceivable that they might conclude that it did (paragraph 34).
While no lawyer was ever affected by the stringent reporting rules in the federal government's money - laundering legislation that some said would turn them into «agents of the state,» last month's unanimous ruling from the Supreme Court of Canada has literally set lawyers apart from other professionals on this front.
Although the Task Force says that this is the province of the voluntary bar associations, these voluntary bars need to come together and create a state or regional association that represents the interests of its members, lobbies on its own behalf, demands transparency from the WSBA and the Court, has a seat at any table where rules are made that affect lawyers and clients, and otherwise keeps close tabs on the regulatory, political, and corporate machinations that directly impact lawyers and our clients.
For example, in cricket where, because of the Kolpak ruling by the European court, there has been an influx of players from countries with whom the EU has association agreements (who are currently protected as if EU nationals), lobbying by the domestic game's governing body, the England and Wales Cricket Board, has led to an announcement from the Commission that it will not issue any legal challenge to regulations which in the future would seek to limit the freedom of movement rights of nationals from the affected countries.
When a Florida resident gets into a car accident, several factors can affect the insurance claims and lawsuits that might result, including Florida's status as a no - fault state, how long drivers have to file court cases after a crash (statute of limitations), and Florida's «pure» comparative fault rule.
A little less than a decade ago, the federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals, whose rulings affect federal cases in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, issued an important ruling that can affect people with bipolar disorder in New Jersey.
However, the Arizona Court of Appeals in the Baker v. Meyer case set forth, even more, factors the trial court must consider when ruling on a choice of school if the change in school will affect a parent's parenting time with the chilCourt of Appeals in the Baker v. Meyer case set forth, even more, factors the trial court must consider when ruling on a choice of school if the change in school will affect a parent's parenting time with the chilcourt must consider when ruling on a choice of school if the change in school will affect a parent's parenting time with the children.
The European Court of Justice has ruled that individuals have the right to have search engine results removed, where they may affect privacy rights.
As my boss Diana Lowe pointed out to me, making the deliberations of a rules committee available via the internet may affect or limit the range of presentations made by counsel in court, whereas rules are formulated to stand on their own, and counsel needs to try them in all ways to see if they are sound.
From such an assessment of the rules, the Court suddenly jumped to the conclusion that «in those circumstances, a decision by which the Parliament considers that a petition addressed to it does not meet the conditions laid down in Article 227 TFEU must be amenable to judicial review, since it is liable to affect the right of petition of the person concerned.
In a ruling yesterday, the court struck an oppression claim after finding the alleged breaches affect all shareholders of a publicly traded company and must proceed by way of a derivative action.
However, Neufeld does admit that the ruling would affect a small number of people who are denied testing in state courts, and claimed that «more innocent people will languish in prison.»
The leading case handed down over twenty years ago was Knight v. Indian Head School Division No. 19 (1990), where the Supreme Court of Canada set out a three - pronged test: when a public body's decision is administrative and final in nature, is made under a statute or code, and affects the interests or rights of the accused person, then the rules of procedural fairness must be followed.
The British Columbia Supreme Court ruled that section 241 of the Criminal Code did not deprive Rodriguez of her right to life, liberty and security of her person, nor did it restrict her freedom of choice or affect her ability to make fundamental decisions about her life.
These lower court judges, however, handle the day - to - day decisions that affect more of us more often than any Supreme Court ruling could ever hopcourt judges, however, handle the day - to - day decisions that affect more of us more often than any Supreme Court ruling could ever hopCourt ruling could ever hope to.
A few days before the Miami ruling came out, I was interviewed by Elaine Silvestrini of the Tampa Tribune about my Tampa same sex divorce case now under appeal in the Second District Court of Appeals and how the Florida Keys ruling may or may not affect the divorce case.
While some submit that the order granted is consistent with standard rules and norms of private international law, others contend that such an order sets a dangerous precedent that will enable the global restriction of information impacting other countries, all without input from the courts of those affected countries.
Last week, two courts ruled on separate Charter challenges to legislation affecting the rights of certain groups of Canadians to vote in the October 2015 election.
In 1985, the Florida Supreme Court ruled in Johnson vs. Davis that sellers are under a duty to disclose any facts materially affecting the value of the property that are not readily observable and are not known to the buyer.
On January 15, 2018, lawyers for Advocates for the Rule of Law («ARL») will be appearing before the Supreme Court of Canada to make submissions in a case that will consider whether there is a justiciable duty to consult potentially affected Aboriginal groups in the legislative process.
I think the impact of Booker on the States affected by Blakely is at the margins of two issues: retroactivity (to Apprendi, at least) and procedural default (the snippet at the end of the Breyer opinion about courts applying their procedural rules).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z