Roland Otaru spoke with newsmen on how
the ruling of the court affected him, «We are affected by the ruling of the court because we feel that our client was not served properly.
Not exact matches
Some would be directly
affected by the policy, which the government can't enforce because
of federal appeals
court rulings against it.
No worries; we should start to learn Thursday morning, which I've taken to calling Health Care Decision Day, how the
court's biggest
ruling of the term will
affect 18 percent
of the U.S. GDP.
The Committee also expressed concern about the «potential extinguishment»
of Indigenous peoples» land rights and that, «despite favourable
rulings of the Supreme
Court», governments continue to impose unwanted decisions
affecting Indigenous peoples» use
of their lands and territories.
I do not yet know what all
of Levin's proposed Liberty Amendments are — apparently, there is a new crack at Congressional term limits, which I am iffy about, an amendment for Supreme
Court decisions to be expunged by 60 %
of Congress or the States, which I am very iffy about, one providing Supreme
Court term limits, which I am cool with, one requiring bureaucracy - ordered
rule - changes to be subject to Congressional approval when they
affect the economy by a certain amount, which I am also.
This would mean, for instance, that participants in an economic transaction are bound to halt their activity whenever any one
of them or any
affected individual objects to it, or a criminal
court judge is bound to halt the trial's proceedings if the accused dissents from a specific
rule of the judicial system.
On May 20, 1996, in Romer v. Evans, the Supreme
Court ruled that the amendment is totally without a rational basis, and is «born
of animosity toward the class
of persons
affected.»
If any
court of law, having the jurisdiction to decide on this matter,
rules that any provision of these Official Rules is invalid or unenforceable, then that provision will be removed from the Official Rules without affecting the rest of the T
rules that any provision
of these Official
Rules is invalid or unenforceable, then that provision will be removed from the Official Rules without affecting the rest of the T
Rules is invalid or unenforceable, then that provision will be removed from the Official
Rules without affecting the rest of the T
Rules without
affecting the rest
of the Terms.
Since the current electoral system is the same to all candidates, and all candidates agreed to these electoral
rules, it is better to talk about the «particularities»
of the system and how these
affect candidates; in fact all
of the candidates try to use those
rules to their advantage (by
courting swing states, etc.).
In Kuric v Slovenia, the European
Court of Human Rights
ruled that once legal residency is established, the right to continue living in a country is not
affected by the change in the legal status
of either the country
of origin or
of residence.
The Silver
ruling will not
affect the federal corruption trials later this year
of nine former associates
of Gov. Andrew Cuomo, including Cuomo's former top aide, on bribery and bid - rigging because those trials will take place after the Supreme
Court's McDonnell
ruling.
Commenting on the lawsuit, Mr. Adom Otchere remarked that «the
courts, historically, will not
rule to
affect the higher expectations
of society.
The nation's highest
court left in place a lower
court ruling halting President Obama's executive action, which would have
affected as many as 4 million illegal immigrants, many
of whom are parents
of legal citizens, granting them work permits and deferred deportation.
Had the
court ruled broadly against independent commissions, it could have
affected district maps in Idaho, Montana and Washington, which also use forms
of independent commissions to draw districts.
The Silver
ruling will not
affect the federal corruption trials later this year
of nine former associates
of Governor Cuomo, including Cuomo's former top aide, on bribery and bid rigging, because those trials will take place after the Supreme
Court's McDonnell
ruling.
But one
of the good things about our judiciary is that, however many people march, it will not
affect the supreme
court's
ruling «by one comma».
«The extent to which the
court should err towards inclusiveness in an action inevitably depends on the facts but in this case the
court finds that Mr Corbyn is a member
of the Labour Party who is particularly
affected and particularly interested in the proper construction
of the
rules, and his interest in that regard is
of a significantly different quality than that
of other members,» she added.
The
court gave the judgment in a case brought before it by the Electoral Commission, which said it disagreed with the ruling of the High Court in favour of Dr. Nduom, and wanted the Supreme Court to quash it, and also make a determination that will affect all other suits relating to the disqualifica
court gave the judgment in a case brought before it by the Electoral Commission, which said it disagreed with the
ruling of the High
Court in favour of Dr. Nduom, and wanted the Supreme Court to quash it, and also make a determination that will affect all other suits relating to the disqualifica
Court in favour
of Dr. Nduom, and wanted the Supreme
Court to quash it, and also make a determination that will affect all other suits relating to the disqualifica
Court to quash it, and also make a determination that will
affect all other suits relating to the disqualification.
Any provision
of these
rules that is adjudged to be invalid or otherwise rendered inoperative by a
court of competent jurisdiction shall not
affect the validity
of any other provision
of these
rules.
Overview
of Lesson Plan: In this lesson, students analyze how education in America
affects it youth and the nation by assessing a variety
of ways in which American
courts and communities are dealing with the unanimous Supreme
Court ruling to end «separate but equal» education.
How, exactly, the Supreme
Court's Monday
ruling in the closely watched Trinity Lutheran case could
affect school vouchers and their ability to expand into new states was the source
of much debate this week.
Iowa recently passed an Act 10 - inspired law with similar policies
affecting public - sector workers and their unions.1 Other states and members
of Congress are considering enacting such policies, and with its
ruling on Janus v. American Federation
of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), the U.S. Supreme
Court may act to weaken public - sector unions and teachers» ability to collectively bargain.2
While the case has received national attention and previous
rulings have set legal precedent, this particular Supreme
Court decision will not affect other suits working their way through the court system, said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Rich
Court decision will not
affect other suits working their way through the
court system, said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Rich
court system, said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University
of Richmond.
Yesterday's
ruling was not unexpected, as Judge Cooper had telegraphed some
of his thinking when in late January he
ruled against a motion for a temporary injunction in the case and also denied the school boards» request to deposit funds with the
court instead
of paying them to charter schools in the
affected Florida counties.
Finally, if you don't know and follow the proper procedures and
rules in
court, it could
affect the outcome
of your case.
If, for example, the company plans to announce earnings or expects a major
court ruling, these events will
affect the implied volatility
of options that expire that same month.
Washington, DC — In a federal
court ruling handed down today, the Cook County, IL, pet sale ordinance scheduled to take effect October 1 has been delayed pending the outcome
of a lawsuit filed by several
of the
affected store owners.
The state
of Michigan, like Ohio, has been unable to address this problem to date due to the United States Constitutional limitation, and a Supreme
Court ruling in 1992, on states
affecting interstate commerce.
However, such an interpretation could be rejected by the European
Court of Justice, who could consider that extending the common
rules to a (future) third country does not, sensu stricto, «
affect» them nor «alter» their scope.
Regarding the impact
of the
rule, the
Court said that it was for the national court to decide if it affected some beliefs more than others, but it was not inconceivable that they might conclude that it did (paragraph
Court said that it was for the national
court to decide if it affected some beliefs more than others, but it was not inconceivable that they might conclude that it did (paragraph
court to decide if it
affected some beliefs more than others, but it was not inconceivable that they might conclude that it did (paragraph 34).
While no lawyer was ever
affected by the stringent reporting
rules in the federal government's money - laundering legislation that some said would turn them into «agents
of the state,» last month's unanimous
ruling from the Supreme
Court of Canada has literally set lawyers apart from other professionals on this front.
Although the Task Force says that this is the province
of the voluntary bar associations, these voluntary bars need to come together and create a state or regional association that represents the interests
of its members, lobbies on its own behalf, demands transparency from the WSBA and the
Court, has a seat at any table where
rules are made that
affect lawyers and clients, and otherwise keeps close tabs on the regulatory, political, and corporate machinations that directly impact lawyers and our clients.
For example, in cricket where, because
of the Kolpak
ruling by the European
court, there has been an influx
of players from countries with whom the EU has association agreements (who are currently protected as if EU nationals), lobbying by the domestic game's governing body, the England and Wales Cricket Board, has led to an announcement from the Commission that it will not issue any legal challenge to regulations which in the future would seek to limit the freedom
of movement rights
of nationals from the
affected countries.
When a Florida resident gets into a car accident, several factors can
affect the insurance claims and lawsuits that might result, including Florida's status as a no - fault state, how long drivers have to file
court cases after a crash (statute
of limitations), and Florida's «pure» comparative fault
rule.
A little less than a decade ago, the federal Third Circuit
Court of Appeals, whose
rulings affect federal cases in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, issued an important
ruling that can
affect people with bipolar disorder in New Jersey.
However, the Arizona
Court of Appeals in the Baker v. Meyer case set forth, even more, factors the trial court must consider when ruling on a choice of school if the change in school will affect a parent's parenting time with the chil
Court of Appeals in the Baker v. Meyer case set forth, even more, factors the trial
court must consider when ruling on a choice of school if the change in school will affect a parent's parenting time with the chil
court must consider when
ruling on a choice
of school if the change in school will
affect a parent's parenting time with the children.
The European
Court of Justice has
ruled that individuals have the right to have search engine results removed, where they may
affect privacy rights.
As my boss Diana Lowe pointed out to me, making the deliberations
of a
rules committee available via the internet may
affect or limit the range
of presentations made by counsel in
court, whereas
rules are formulated to stand on their own, and counsel needs to try them in all ways to see if they are sound.
From such an assessment
of the
rules, the
Court suddenly jumped to the conclusion that «in those circumstances, a decision by which the Parliament considers that a petition addressed to it does not meet the conditions laid down in Article 227 TFEU must be amenable to judicial review, since it is liable to
affect the right
of petition
of the person concerned.
In a
ruling yesterday, the
court struck an oppression claim after finding the alleged breaches
affect all shareholders
of a publicly traded company and must proceed by way
of a derivative action.
However, Neufeld does admit that the
ruling would
affect a small number
of people who are denied testing in state
courts, and claimed that «more innocent people will languish in prison.»
The leading case handed down over twenty years ago was Knight v. Indian Head School Division No. 19 (1990), where the Supreme
Court of Canada set out a three - pronged test: when a public body's decision is administrative and final in nature, is made under a statute or code, and
affects the interests or rights
of the accused person, then the
rules of procedural fairness must be followed.
The British Columbia Supreme
Court ruled that section 241
of the Criminal Code did not deprive Rodriguez
of her right to life, liberty and security
of her person, nor did it restrict her freedom
of choice or
affect her ability to make fundamental decisions about her life.
These lower
court judges, however, handle the day - to - day decisions that affect more of us more often than any Supreme Court ruling could ever hop
court judges, however, handle the day - to - day decisions that
affect more
of us more often than any Supreme
Court ruling could ever hop
Court ruling could ever hope to.
A few days before the Miami
ruling came out, I was interviewed by Elaine Silvestrini
of the Tampa Tribune about my Tampa same sex divorce case now under appeal in the Second District
Court of Appeals and how the Florida Keys
ruling may or may not
affect the divorce case.
While some submit that the order granted is consistent with standard
rules and norms
of private international law, others contend that such an order sets a dangerous precedent that will enable the global restriction
of information impacting other countries, all without input from the
courts of those
affected countries.
Last week, two
courts ruled on separate Charter challenges to legislation
affecting the rights
of certain groups
of Canadians to vote in the October 2015 election.
In 1985, the Florida Supreme
Court ruled in Johnson vs. Davis that sellers are under a duty to disclose any facts materially
affecting the value
of the property that are not readily observable and are not known to the buyer.
On January 15, 2018, lawyers for Advocates for the
Rule of Law («ARL») will be appearing before the Supreme
Court of Canada to make submissions in a case that will consider whether there is a justiciable duty to consult potentially
affected Aboriginal groups in the legislative process.
I think the impact
of Booker on the States
affected by Blakely is at the margins
of two issues: retroactivity (to Apprendi, at least) and procedural default (the snippet at the end
of the Breyer opinion about
courts applying their procedural
rules).