For example, my firm spends less money on hard copies of the Alberta
Rules of Court because many lawyers access a nice current, useable, free pdf version on their personal mobile devices.
Roland Otaru spoke with newsmen on how the ruling of the court affected him, «We are affected by
the ruling of the court because we feel that our client was not served properly.
Not exact matches
Apple also cites U.S. v. New York Telephone
because the Supreme
Court, in its
ruling, addressed the question
of what is and isn't an «unreasonable» request under the All Writs Act.
Some would be directly affected by the policy, which the government can't enforce
because of federal appeals
court rulings against it.
Under the «business judgment
rule,»
courts (in Canada, the US, the UK, and elsewhere) are generally reluctant to tell a corporation's board
of directors that they've failed in their duty
of care vis - a-vis shareholders,
because the
court lacks the competency to do so.
Facebook also this year lost a
court ruling in Germany, which declared its privacy settings illegal
because it fails to obtain the correct level
of consent.
In January, a federal appeals
court ruled that
because ISPs are not regulated as utilities, equal access regulations could not apply to these providers, as they do with telecommunications carriers under the Communications Act
of 1934.
In fact, in December 2017 a Virginia district
court judge
ruled against a female plaintiff in a lawsuit alleging sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation against defense contractor BAE Systems, in part,
because she «did not take advantage
of BAE's harassment reporting procedures
of which she was well aware.»
Lucas took the designer to
court for copyright infringement, but the
court ruled the replicas were not covered by copyright law
because they are not works
of art.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals said its
ruling stemmed from a 2008 decision in which it held that Cablevision Systems Corp. could offer a remote digital video recording service without paying additional licensing fees to broadcasters
because each playback transmission was made to a single subscriber using a single unique copy produced by that subscriber.
Despite criticism that the plate was religious in nature, a
court case
ruled that the plate could stay
because removing it would have impeded upon the freedom
of speech.
If the Supreme
Court rules in favor
of King, it would end up leaving millions without insurance
because they would not longer be able to afford the premiums, or the deductible.
Gertner's first involvement in the («legal,» he jokes) Canadian marijuana market came after a 2000 Ontario
Court of Appeals
ruling that the government's pot prohibitions were unconstitutional
because they did not include a carve - out for medical use.
«A
ruling by a Louisiana appeals
court recently stated that the entire death benefit from a single premium annuity plan paid to the beneficiary named in that plan was subject to inheritance tax
because it was part
of the deceased annuity owner's estate,» says annuities specialist Steven Hart.
We expect that to happen again — particularly
because the jury was prohibited from knowing about these
court rulings in favor
of Gawker, prohibited from seeing critical evidence gathered by the FBI and prohibited from hearing from the most important witness, Bubba Clem.
However, the yields are high
because the share prices are often depressed over concerns
of particular
court rulings, taxes imposed on cigarettes and other factors.
Because the Supreme
Court's decision relied on on interpretation of the RFRA and not the First Amendment itself, Congress, by enacting legislation such as the bill offered by Murray and Udall, could override the court's ruling and guarantee women the same level of comprehensive health care coverage available to
Court's decision relied on on interpretation
of the RFRA and not the First Amendment itself, Congress, by enacting legislation such as the bill offered by Murray and Udall, could override the
court's ruling and guarantee women the same level of comprehensive health care coverage available to
court's
ruling and guarantee women the same level
of comprehensive health care coverage available to men.
Employees who refuse to work on their sabbath have been the principal beneficiaries
of this
rule (in another case a worker lost his job in a brass mill
because he refused to help manufacture tank turrets) The Oregon
courts followed these cases and awarded unemployment compensation to Smith and Black.
The
court ruled against SCHOOL SPONSORED PRAYER
because it violated the rights
of children in the classroom who believed differently than the SCHOOL SPONSORED PRAYER.
«It's hard
because the (Supreme)
Court lays down these rules, and everybody thinks that the court is being hostile to religion, and people get unhappy and angry and agitated,» said Kagan near the end of Wednesday's oral argum
Court lays down these
rules, and everybody thinks that the
court is being hostile to religion, and people get unhappy and angry and agitated,» said Kagan near the end of Wednesday's oral argum
court is being hostile to religion, and people get unhappy and angry and agitated,» said Kagan near the end
of Wednesday's oral arguments.
In those cases the
court deferred to the judgment
of the Air Force that the free - exercise claim
of a Jewish officer who wore his yarmulke on duty could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment
of correctional authorities that the free - exercise claim
of a Black Muslim to attend Friday afternoon religious services could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment
of the Department
of Agriculture's Forest Service that building a logging road through a national forest was necessary despite the damage to religious practices
of Native American tribes in that area; it deferred to the Internal Revenue Service's
ruling that Bob Jones University was not entitled to tax exemption
because of its religiously motivated
rule against interracial dating and marriage on campus; it deferred to the judgment
of the secretary
of labor that a religious community must pay its members the minimum wage for work they performed in the group's business although the members said they had religious objections to being paid for their work.
The Second Circuit
Court of Appeals
ruled that a New York town board's tradition
of opening monthly meetings with prayer is unconstitutional
because the town should have tried harder to find non-Christian speakers — even if that required recruiting beyond the town's borders.
Sean Jones QC, for Canon Pemberton, told the
court the bishop's decisions which barred him from officiating were wrong
because the C
of E does not have a fixed
rule on same - sex marriage among members
of the clergy.
In November, the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals in New Orleans
ruled a Mississippi law was unconstitutional
because it effectively closed the last clinic in the state.
Four British Christians urged Europe's top
court Tuesday to
rule that they faced discrimination
because of their religious beliefs.
A federal appeals
court on May 31st ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional because it denies equal rights for legally married same - sex couples, making it likely that the Supreme Court will consider the politically divisive issue for the first time in its next
court on May 31st
ruled that the Defense
of Marriage Act is unconstitutional
because it denies equal rights for legally married same - sex couples, making it likely that the Supreme
Court will consider the politically divisive issue for the first time in its next
Court will consider the politically divisive issue for the first time in its next term.
But doesn't Reno know that the Supreme
Court has
ruled repeatedly — in decisions from Grosjean v. American Press Co. (1936) to Leathers v. Medlock (1991)-- to strike down laws imposing differential taxes on speakers
because of their content or viewpoint?
The
court ruled that, for purposes
of summary judgment, the plaintiff class established a defect not
because their individually purchased products contained biological contaminants, but rather
because the act
of recalling potentially contaminated food provided evidence
of a product defect.
In rejecting the defendant's contention that the
court's
ruling was «tantamount to... find [ing] that a recall alone demonstrates defect in the recalled products,» the
court stated that the products were defective not
because of the recall, but
because they were considered unfit for human consumption by Costco.
Feerick has until Oct. 18 to
rule, but even a decision in favor
of the players is not likely to trigger a quick resolution
of the lockout
because the owners are certain to appeal in
court.
Cus could have reapplied for a license years ago
because a
court of law reversed the commission's
ruling, but he is convinced there are those who will kind
of make sure he is sort
of turned down.
The Supreme
Court is expected to
rule on two landmark cases impacting same - sex couples this week and their ability to marry (I am loathe to call it same - sex marriage or gay marriage
because it's just marriage, no different than anyone else's marriage; the people in it just happen to be
of the same sex).
In its submission to the
court, the association said the new
rules were unfair
because it would cost the formula companies USD$ 128 million to comply with them, USD$ 120 million
of which would be in lost sales.
It relates the story
of a Cincinatti mom who got fired
because she pumped her milk during an unscheduled break, and moreover the story
of the Ohio supreme
court who just
ruled that breastfeeding is not a gender specific ability (what, excuse me?).
General Secretary
of the
ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) Johnson Asiedu Nketiah has fired a sharp riposte at the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) for claiming Justice Yaw Apau was appointed to the Supreme
Court because he did a «hatchet» job for the government on Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo - Addo.
But the
court, presided over by a single justice, Mr Justice Alfred Anthony Benin, on Friday morning
ruled that the A-G did nothing wrong
because the writ
of execution had not expired and was effective.
However, in Olmstead v US (1928) the Supreme
Court ruled that wiretapping did not constitute a violation
of search and seizure (Fourth Amendment) or self - incrimination (Fifth Amendment)
because there was no entry into premises to be searched and Olmstead was free not to make self - incriminating remarks on the phone.
The
court said the contractor, Lancaster Development
of Richmondville, wasn't allowed to challenge the contract
rules — relying on legal «standing» principles —
because it didn't submit a bid.
The 2d U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals said the conviction
of Skelos and his son Adam for using Dean's influence to extort financial benefits for Adam had to be overturned
because the jury charge didn't comply with a new Supreme
Court ruling narrowing federal anti-corruption laws.
Former Senate Leader Joe Bruno, who was convicted on mail and wire fraud in 2009, won on appeal — also
because of changes in federal law determined by another U.S. Supreme
Court ruling.
The Silver
ruling will not affect the federal corruption trials later this year
of nine former associates
of Gov. Andrew Cuomo, including Cuomo's former top aide, on bribery and bid - rigging
because those trials will take place after the Supreme
Court's McDonnell
ruling.
In 2008 the
courts ruled that using force for these purposes breaches children's human rights
because it can cause serious harm and was not shown to be necessary (the
court referred to evidence that in secure children's Homes restraint is not used to enforce good behaviour by children convicted
of an offence).
The high
court also
ruled against the home secretary over her decision to deport a former serving British soldier to Botswana
because of a speeding ticket.
A Manhattan appeals panel — in a first -
of - its - kind decision — overturned a lower -
court ruling that said you can't be fired
because of your gender but you could get the boot for being «too cute.»
Because in the Peskova
ruling of May 2017 the European
Court of Justice (ECJ) decided that a bird strike was an «extraordinary event» under EU flight compensation regulation 261 - with the result that airlines didn't have to pay compensation, just as they don't for delays caused by lightning strikes or severe weather events.
«One may also ask, is the DSS also keeping the head
of Nigeria's Islamic Movement, Ibrahim El - Zakzaky, who has been in detention since late 2015 despite that the
court ruled that he should be released
because he refused to cooperate with investigators?
Ministers said the change was brought in
because of court rulings that household items, costing no extra money, counted as aids and appliances.
Judges are expected to disqualify themselves from cases in which their impartiality «might reasonably be questioned»
because of social, familial or other ties to a defendant, according to New York state
court rules.
The
rules are illegal
because they would modify Verizon's existing spectrum licenses without its approval, the company said in a notice
of appeal filed on Friday at the US district
court of appeals in Columbia.
Because of a July Supreme
Court ruling on the «honest services» statute (often used to prosecute allegedly corrupt politicians), former State Senate Majority Leader Joe Bruno's two felony convictions will likely be overturned, federal officials conceded yesterday.