But, in 1972, after evaluating the data, she published a critical paper, Economy, Efficiency, Equality: The Myths of
Rural School Consolidation (later expanded into a book cowritten with colleagues).
Not exact matches
Better at When Than How As
school districts around the country grapple with turnaround strategies and fiscal realities,
school closure (and
consolidation) has become a popular option in districts from Baltimore to Detroit, from Boston to Denver, even in
rural places like Maine and North Dakota.
The fragmentation of districts and declining populations has led to a wave of
school consolidations in
rural America.
(p. 5) Tyack & Cuban: «In the firm belief that they were the trustees of the public interest, superintendents and other policy elites of the first half of the century tended to dismiss their opponents as ignorant or self - interested... They regarded the
rural foes of
school consolidation as backward yokels who did not know what was good for their children.»
Another dramatic problem facing
rural education is the issue of
consolidation of
schools.
The push for
rural consolidation is all the stranger given the movement in urban areas toward smaller
schools, including charter
schools, so that classroom sizes are smaller and there is more accountability among students, parents, and administrators.
But many
rural educators see
consolidation as a disaster: Since
schools are often the heart of small communities, there are devastating social implications when they are closed, including that parents and town leaders lose control and interest.