Sentences with phrase «russian arbitral award»

In this case the court refused to enforce a Russian arbitral award of almost nine billion roubles (RUB) which was subsequently set aside by the Russian courts.

Summary: The counterparty resisted enforcement against a Russian arbitral award on the grounds that it was not «duly» notified of the arbitration proceedings, as required by Section 54 of the...

Elektrim SA v Vivendi Universal SA & Ors [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep 8: grounds for restraining by injunction an arbitration; as well as several leading cases dealing with interim relief in aid of international arbitral proceedings including Mobil Cerro Negor Ltd v Petroleos de Venezuela SA [2008] 1 Lloyd's Rep 684 (expropriation of Mobil's oil fields in Venezuela; successfully discharged worldwide freezing order for US$ 12 billion under s. 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996); ETI NV v Republic of Bolivia [2009] 1 WLR 665 (CA): (nationalisation of company; successfully discharged a freezing order obtained under s. 25 of the CJJA 1982 and s. 44 of the AA 1996 in aid of an ICSID arbitration); Telenor v Vimpelcom & Altimo Group (pre-arbitration interim relief in S$ 3bn telecommunications shareholder dispute); Yukos Oil v Rosneft (US$ 425m freezing order in support of enforcement of Russian arbitral awards);

Not exact matches

In 2009 the arbitral tribunal found that it had jurisdiction over the dispute and in 2012 the arbitral tribunal delivered a final award on the merits, unanimously stating that the Russian Federation was guilty of expropriation and ordered Russia to pay compensation in accordance with the BIT.

An award on the merits against the Russian Federation was delivered by the arbitral tribunal in 2012, while the parallel proceeding with the Stockholm District Court dismissing the Russian Federation's plea for negative declaratory relief was not concluded until 2014.

Summary: The respondent, a Russian energy company, challenged a 2013 arbitral award that ordered it to pay damages to a U.S. oil company for breaches of a cooperation agreement relating to the...

Summary: The appellant appealed to a judgment of the Svea Court of Appeal, alleging that a Swedish arbitral award was invalid, as it resolved non-arbitrable issues breaching Swedish and Russian...

More recently, he has been instructed in relation to the enforcement of the arbitral awards in Yukos v Russian Federation (US$ 50 billion plus) involving issues of state immunity / lifting the corporate veil; PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov / Kolomoisky; Crescent Petroleum v National Iranian Oil Company (US$ 15 billion).

In addition to having been instructed in major arbitrations, such as the Bermudan - based arbitration relating to the reinsurance of Arthur Andersen following the collapse of Enron and WorldCom, and Elektrim SA's long running dispute with Vivendi Universal over Polish telecommunications, he has particular expertise in relation to inter relief applications to the Court in relation to heavy arbitrations such as ETI Euro Telecom V Republic of Bolivia [2008](no pre-emptive relief in aid of an ICSID arbitration); Elektrim SA v Vivendi [2007] 1 Lloyd's Rep 693 (s. 68 of AA 1996 and awards obtained by fraud); Elektrim v Vivendi [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep 8 (injunction to restrain arbitration continuing) Telenor East Holding II AS v Altimo Holdings & Investments Ltd (multi-billion dollar shareholder dispute — interim injunction under s. 44 of the AA 1996); Steadfast v Baker Hughes (s. 9 (3) step in the action preventing a stay in favour of arbitration) and enforcement of arbitral awards (Yukos v Rosneft: US$ 500m and Yukos v Russian Federation US$ 50 billion.

The published materials include three decisions from 2016 - 2017, in which Russian courts recognized SCC arbitral awards as enforceable on the territory of the Russian Federation.

He has a wide range of experience in all key aspects of international arbitration and litigation, including enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and state court judgments in Russia and abroad as well as obtaining interim measures from Russian courts in support of foreign proceedings.

Counsel for German, Russian and American companies in proceedings to enforce foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Ontario.