Sentences with phrase «russian arbitration awards»

Zavod Ekran Oao v Magneco Metrel UK Ltd [2017] EWHC 2208 (Comm); [2017] Lloyd's Rep. Plus 83 Action by the Claimant to enforce a Russian arbitration award of the International Commercial Arbitration Court.

Not exact matches

Acting for a Russian bank in relation to proposed enforcement proceedings relating to an LCIA arbitration award against an individual borrower in Cyprus and other jurisdictions, including asset freezing relief.

The Russian defendant objected and argued that the SCC lacked jurisdiction over the dispute, that the Russian party had not been duly notified of the arbitration, and that enforcement of the award would constitute a violation of Russian public policy.

Summary: The counterparty resisted enforcement against a Russian arbitral award on the grounds that it was not «duly» notified of the arbitration proceedings, as required by Section 54 of the...

The Russian Federation, the English proceedings relating to the US$ 50 billion arbitration awards obtained against Russia by the former majority shareholders of Yukos.

Elektrim SA v Vivendi Universal SA & Ors [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep 8: grounds for restraining by injunction an arbitration; as well as several leading cases dealing with interim relief in aid of international arbitral proceedings including Mobil Cerro Negor Ltd v Petroleos de Venezuela SA [2008] 1 Lloyd's Rep 684 (expropriation of Mobil's oil fields in Venezuela; successfully discharged worldwide freezing order for US$ 12 billion under s. 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996); ETI NV v Republic of Bolivia [2009] 1 WLR 665 (CA): (nationalisation of company; successfully discharged a freezing order obtained under s. 25 of the CJJA 1982 and s. 44 of the AA 1996 in aid of an ICSID arbitration); Telenor v Vimpelcom & Altimo Group (pre-arbitration interim relief in S$ 3bn telecommunications shareholder dispute); Yukos Oil v Rosneft (US$ 425m freezing order in support of enforcement of Russian arbitral awards);

In addition to having been instructed in major arbitrations, such as the Bermudan - based arbitration relating to the reinsurance of Arthur Andersen following the collapse of Enron and WorldCom, and Elektrim SA's long running dispute with Vivendi Universal over Polish telecommunications, he has particular expertise in relation to inter relief applications to the Court in relation to heavy arbitrations such as ETI Euro Telecom V Republic of Bolivia [2008](no pre-emptive relief in aid of an ICSID arbitration); Elektrim SA v Vivendi [2007] 1 Lloyd's Rep 693 (s. 68 of AA 1996 and awards obtained by fraud); Elektrim v Vivendi [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep 8 (injunction to restrain arbitration continuing) Telenor East Holding II AS v Altimo Holdings & Investments Ltd (multi-billion dollar shareholder dispute — interim injunction under s. 44 of the AA 1996); Steadfast v Baker Hughes (s. 9 (3) step in the action preventing a stay in favour of arbitration) and enforcement of arbitral awards (Yukos v Rosneft: US$ 500m and Yukos v Russian Federation US$ 50 billion.

It unanimously upheld the decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal, which in turn upheld the trial court, in all cases finding that the winner of the Russian arbitration was out of time to enforce the award in Alberta.

Dorothy Murray Qualified: 2005 Made partner: 2013 Key cases: Defending a major Russian telecoms group against the enforcement of an LCIA $ 220m arbitration award.

It found that it was common ground between the experts that under applicable Russian arbitration law at least one valid ground to set aside the award had been present, which related to the obligations on the arbitrators to disclose certain potential conflicts of interest.

Advising in the enforcement in England of a US$ 50 billion arbitration award against the Russian Federation.

Priya is currently representing the former shareholders of Yukos Oil Company in relation to the enforcement in England of a US$ 50 + billion arbitration award against the Russian Federation.

Representation of investor in expropriation claim against the Russian Federation in BIT arbitration in Stockholm that secured the first award holding that the Russian measures taken against Yukos Oil Company amounted to expropriation

Obtained a favorable arbitration award on behalf of a Dutch investor in a Russian steel mill in a dispute with its partner.

He has a wide range of experience in all key aspects of international arbitration and litigation, including enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and state court judgments in Russia and abroad as well as obtaining interim measures from Russian courts in support of foreign proceedings.

Representing the former shareholders of Yukos Oil Company in English proceedings to enforce a US$ 54 + billion arbitration award against the Russian Federation.