Sentences with phrase «sabs does»

The Arbitrator found the reasoning in cases such as Sommerville and State Farm and Ramalingam and State Farm instructive on the point that the SABS does not contemplate two versions of housekeeping and attendant care benefits (pre-104 week and post-104 week) which have two separate applications and require two separate denials.

The new SABS does not clarify that the services are to be provided by a professional OR a family member.

Not exact matches

How did you learn about Save - a-Bull (SAB) and what made you decide to volunteer with us?

The SAB finds that the EPA did not support quantitatively its conclusion about lack of evidence for widespread, systemic impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources, and did not clearly describe the system (s) of interest (e.g., groundwater, surface water), the scale of impacts (i.e., local or regional), nor the definitions of «systemic» and «widespread.»

It appears likely that this is because the CIC does not believe there should be any real debate on climate science or any other science - based issue coming before EPA and that the SAB should only hear the views of those who closely support the tenets of those who are willing to overthrow science - based environmental regulation in favor of climate alarmism and environmental extremism.

But even with the «environmental» groups» strong influence, the Obama Administration may not have trusted the SAB to render the invalid scientific conclusions on climate alarmism they wanted in their Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding and failed to submit their GHG Endangerment Finding to the SAB for review despite the clear need for it to do so on such an important and influential issue.

Pruitt did not renew terms for a number of respected members and dismissed several independent scientists before their terms were up, shrinking the SAB from 47 to 42 participants and more than doubling the number of its polluter - friendly members.

Pursuant to the New SABS, if an insured party wishes to receive the AC benefit by a family member that does not provide the service in the course of their employment, occupation or profession, that family member must sustain an economic loss as a result of providing the AC services.

In the trial judgment in Broesky, Mackinnon J. dismissed the plaintiff's action after finding that she did NOT retain the solicitor to prosecute her tort action or her SAB claim, but rather only her action for disability benefits.

c) two Superior Court cases decided by Justice T.R. Lofchik in Cromwell V. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 3 and Vanderkop v. Personal Insurance Co. of Canada4 essentially concluding that lump sum payments pursuant to a settlement of a long term disability claim not specifically broken down do not constitute «a payment under any income continuation plan» in accordance with section 7 of the SABS, and consequently need not be deducted from an income replacement benefit that may be ongoing.

In other words, if a claimant does not meet the definition of «insured person» in the SABS under a particular policy, they are not covered under that policy for that loss.

The September 2010 legislative change to the definition of «insured person» in the SABS, requiring a claimant to be a spouse or a dependent of an individual, does not restrict a claimant from being a spouse or dependent of a regular user

The matter eventually made its way to the Court of Appeal, which agreed with Ms. Pastore's position that the SABS language did not require marked impairments in all four areas for a catastrophic impairment designation.

This raises a perplexing question: Why does section 36 of the SABS require a completed Disability Certificate to accompany an application for a specified benefit?

In Pastore v. Aviva Canada the Court of Appeal ruled that the language of the SABS (Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule) does not require that a claimant be considered markedly impaired in more than one area of life to be designated as catastrophically impaired.

Important Decision on Catastrophic Impairments May 2, 2013 In Pastore v. Aviva Canada the Court of Appeal ruled that the language of the SABS (Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule) does not require that a c....

He did not resolve his SABS claim with Dominion, and the claim remained open during these proceedings.