In many ways, Wednesday's Screen Actors Guild nominations went according to plan, with the 2,100 randomly - chosen voters on
the SAG Nominating Committee saluting the actors they were expected to salute and honoring the films they were supposed to honor.
* Late arriving films usually do not fare well with the large
SAG nominating committee.
Additionally, many of those screenings featured a significant number of no - shows of
SAG nominating committee members.
Doomsayers might be tempted to downplay «Wolf» on Wednesday if it doesn't show up in the Screen Actors Guild nominations, but Paramount didn't send out screeners to
the SAG nominating committee, and were barely able to screen the film for voters.
Early screeners were key for 2,000 +
SAG nominating committee, facetime and interviews are big for the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.
But having no SAG ensemble nomination, that says something about it, and what that something is is that they (
the SAG nominating committee) liked five other movies more for that ensemble award.
Like «The Post,» not enough members of
the SAG nominating committee saw the film in time to accord it nominations.
Not exact matches
Like «Phantom Thread,» «The Post» missed being seen by enough members of the
SAG Awards
nominating committee to land the coveted Ensemble or any other nominations.
Although the
SAG / AFTRA is now roughly 150,000 members, the
nominating committee is just a couple thousand.
Nominees chosen by their respective
SAG Awards film and television
nominating committees were announced on Dec. 9, 2015.
The
nominating committee for the
SAG is much smaller, obviously, than the 94,000 body.
With a
nominating committee of 2,000
SAG members, there is no assurance that the
SAG screenings that take place in Los Angeles and New York will be seen by these voters.