Sentences with phrase «scc legal»

The note, authored by SCC legal counsel Anja Havedal Ipp and SCC Intern Elena Burova, also discusses the standard for arbitrator impartiality in SCC arbitrations and explains the procedure for challenges to arbitrators.

SCC legal counsel Natalia Petrik discusses key legislative proposals to the Swedish Arbitration Act in the article recently published in the Russian legal journal International Commercial Arbitration Review.

A recently published article by SCC Legal Counsel Anja Havedal Ipp highlights this seeming paradox, briefly discusses the Chinese investment treaty regime, and summarizes the distinguishing features of the most common investment arbitration fora.

SCC Legal Counsel Anja Håvedal Ipp will speak at a conference on international dispute resolution and diversity in Krakow 15 — 16 October.

SCC Legal Counsel Natalia Petrik is invited to speak about the EU sanctions at the conference on «International Dispute Resolution involving Russian and CIS Parties» in London next year.

SCC Legal Counsel, Celeste Salinas Quero will speak during a conference about Costs in International Arbitration.

A recently published article by SCC Legal Counsel Anja Håvedal Ipp provides both a background and an update.

On June 2 - 3, SCC Legal Counsel Anja Havedal Ipp spoke on multiparty and collective arbitration at a conference in Vienna, Austria.

One if the speakers, SCC Legal Counsel Anja Håvedal Ipp, reports from the event here.

In a just published blogpost at the Kluwer Arbitration Blog, SCC Legal Counsel Anja Håvedal - Ipp introduces the Stockholm Treaty Lab — how international law can promote green investment.

In a recently - published practice note, SCC legal intern Samuel Carey analysed mediation proceedings at the SCC between 2003 — 2017.

SCC Legal Counsels Natalia Petrik and Alison Tibell will give lectures in two separate panels that will address constitution of the Tribunal and commencement of proceeding.

In a newly - published article in China Business Law Journal, SCC Legal Counsel Anja Håvedal - Ipp highlights the new provisions in the 2017 SCC Arbitration Rules.

The speakers include SCC Board Member Bart Legum and SCC Legal Counsel Natalia Petrik.

In a recently - published practice note, SCC Legal Counsel Anja Håvedal - Ipp analyzed emergency arbitrator proceedings at the SCC in 2015 — 2016.

SCC legal counsel Natalia Petrik has recently participated as a panelist at two annual events in London dedicated to Russia / CIS disputes.

Among the speakers were SCC Board member Bart Legum; Boris Kasolowski, partner Freshfields Bruckhaus Derringer and Natalia Petrik, SCC Legal Counsel.

«The book has proved to be a useful tool for foreign professionals acting in Swedish international arbitral proceedings; this, combined with the importance of Sweden as preferred venue for dispute resolution involving parties from CIS countries, led the SAA and SCC to work on a Russian translation of the book», said SCC Legal Counsel Natalia Petrik.

SCC Chairperson Ulf Franke and SCC Legal Counsel Nina Berggren discussed the advantages of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms mentioning the speed, privacy, expertise, flexibility and enforceability of arbitration and mediation.

To find out more about the Swedish candidacy, contact SCC Legal counsel Nina Berggren, [email protected], or Jakob Ragnwaldh, [email protected], chairperson of the Organizing Committee for ICCA Stockholm 2020.

Not exact matches

Roger Bezdek was one of several witnesses sponsored by Peabody Energy, fighting a legal case on Minnesota's Social Cost of Carbon (SCC).

Richard Lindzen was one of several witnesses sponsored by Peabody Energy, fighting a legal case on Minnesota's Social Cost of Carbon (SCC).

If a SCC calculation is needed, it should be done through an agency with legal responsibilities for good science.

By entrenched I mean that SCC has been written into the legal framework for federal cost benefit analysis in ways that will make it difficult to remove.

Both TLABC and CBA BC morphed from interveners in earlier instances to in situ appellants at the SCC, and each participated through the able advocacy of their legal champions, Darrell Roberts, QC, and Chantelle Rajotte, co-champions for TLABC, and Sharon Matthews, QC and Dr. Melina Buckley on behalf of CBA BC.

The SCC used, in reading the provision, a very commonplace legal rule of interpretation: what did the people who enacted the legislation mean by the word in question.

The majority opinion, written by Justice Encarnación Roca, is not remarkably lengthy for an SCC decision; its «Legal Reasoning» section has 4 parts, the first one being introductory.

Part 2 of the Legal Reasoning section recalls that the SCC had referred three questions to the CJEU.

Furthermore, the SCC found that the primacy of EU law does not go against the supremacy of the Constitution; once the EU legal order is accepted into the Spanish system, and within the competences attributed to the EU, «the Constitution is not the standard of validity of Community law, but the Treaty itself», and the SCC may not generally control the legality of EU secondary law.

The SCC's landmark ruling could queue the next challenge to the gatekeepers of Ontario's legal profession: the cost of legal education

In recent months, the Spanish Constitutional Court (SCC) has issued a series of decisions related to EU law that show an interesting combination of both openness toward the European legal order and a certain degree of apprehension to the growing role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in constitutional matters.

Under Article 163 of the Spanish Constitution, ordinary judges may submit a «constitutional question'to the SCC when, in the midst of a case, they are confronted with an applicable and relevant legal provision that they think is inconsistent with the Constitution.

If a referral does not meet the relevance test (i.e. the judge has not explained why the questioned legal provision is relevant for the specific case), the SCC dismisses the question and remands the case back to the ordinary court.

You're overlooking (not really, I know) that you're talking to too many practitioners, here, who've learned, too well, from their Court of Appeal (and the SCC, too often) that it's not really a problem if nobody notices the absence of legal basis.

Although I'm not going to weigh in on the legal issues in Doré v. Barreau du Québec, 2012 SCC 12, the more interesting issue for me is how wound up lawyers (and judges) can get, as shown by the following passages from this case.

While providing an overview of SCC: s emergency caseload, Mrs. Petrik's presentation was focused on the emergency relief sought in treaty - based proceedings and specific legal issues arising in the context of investment arbitration.

Annette Magnusson, Secretary General SCC, will speak about innovation in practice and share some of the ongoing initiatives by SCC as well as the need for interdisciplinary legal innovation to meet challenges of the future.

The SCC's decision is based in part on Quebec contract laws that don't apply elsewhere in Canada, but also on general legal principles that do:

Having been involved in a car crash that orphaned and seriously injured a seven - year old boy, Ms. Nixon may not engender a high degree of public sympathy but her legal ordeal set the stage for a very significant precedent handed down by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) several weeks ago in R. v. Nixon 2011 SCC 34.

Joanna Birenbaum, director of litigation for the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund, an intervener in the case, says if the SCC orders N.S. to remove her niqab, it could have far - reaching implications for sexual assault victims.

At a recent CBA / SCC Liaison Committee meeting on Posting of Factums on the Web, the Supreme Court Justices raised questions concerning a number of legal and practical issues: * Who holds copyright in factums?

The evidence before the SCC indicated that repudiation had occurred only twice in the entire breadth of Alberta legal jurisprudence.

Challenges and opportunities for legal practitioners were in focus in the panel debate including Kate Davies, Archana Makol, Rikard Åkerman and Jim Runsten, moderated by SCC Deputy Secretary General Kristin Campbell - Wilson.

The SCC's decision in this case will have repercussions well beyond the legal principles involved.

By way of example, I hope to do a new edition of my Law of Independent Legal Advice (Carswell, 2000) to take into account some of the more recent law, including, for example, Miglin v. Miglin, 2003 SCC 24, but time is a huge factor).

Legal aid lawyers have recently embarked on another bid to create an association, relying on the SCC decision last year in Mounted Police Association of Ontario v. Canada (Attorney General).

[10] And, quite apart from avoiding the multiplicity of actions — the mischief sought to be avoided by s 8 of the Judicature Act and R 1.3 of the Alberta Rules of Court, a proposition for which there is also ample case authority — the chambers judge properly adhered to the urging of the Supreme Court of Canada in Hryniak v Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 (CanLII), [2014] 1 SCR 87 to the effect that courts are obliged to resolve legal disputes in the most cost - effective and timely method available, provided the process selected ensures fairness between the parties.

The 1999 SCC decision of M&H had already put the issue on the legal radar screen, and while the recognition of same - sex marriage wasn't at issue in that case (it dealt with rights as common law partners), it left little doubt as to where the court would go in the future, if need be.

This is just an alert until the other blog gets its post up, but the SCC just ruled out broad claims to ground a right to paid legal services within the Charter.

Civil Procedure, Competition, Class Actions, Criminal: Disclosure Imperial Oil v. Jacques, 2014 SCC 66 (35226, 35231) There was no factual or legal impediment to disclosure of the documents requested by the respondents under art. 402 C.C.P..