Sentences with phrase «scc allows»

Using front radar sensors, SCC allows a constant speed and distance to be maintained from the vehicle ahead without depressing the accelerator or brake pedals; it is automatically cancelled when speed drops to 10 km / h or below.

The SCC allowed the appeal.

In a split decision, the majority of the SCC allowed the appeal, and confirmed that employees governed by the Code can only be terminated for just cause.

A majority of the SCC allowed the Union's appeal, with the judgment being written by Justice Rosalie Abella.

In Sable, the SCC allowed the appeal and concluded that there was «no tangible prejudice created by withholding the amounts of the settlements which can be said to outweigh the public interest in promoting settlements».14 In light of

The SCC allowed the appeal, for reasons discussed below.

The SCC allowed the appeal, finding that, while the Privacy Act does not override the forum selection clause, the Applicant had established strong reasons not to enforce the clause.

For those who want to know what happened in the appeal: the SCC allowed the plaintiff's appeal, restored the trial judge's decision that the defendant was liable, and returned the case to the BCCA to deal with the parties» damages appeals which the BCCA hadn't considered since it dismissed the action.

Not exact matches

This capability allows the SCC to extract natural essences and oils.

As mentioned, of the three statistical models the EPA uses to estimate the SCC, only the FUND model allows the SCC to be negative.

Unlike the DICE model, however, the FUND model allows its estimates of the SCC to be negative.

Indeed, there are practical, real - world reasons for the carbon tax to start below the SCC — to allow households and businesses at least a little time to adjust to higher fossil fuel costs — but to soon rise to meet or even exceed the SCC, in order to counterbalance institutional barriers that prevent societies from responding to price signals fully and instantly.

Rate adjustment clauses (RAC) allow Appalachian to adjust parts of the bill annually — with SCC approval — for mandated, unplanned and other specified costs not included in base rates.

But whereas customers who have solar panels one their own roof get credited at full retail value and own the associated renewable energy credits, HB 618 allows the SCC to devise rules that could result in a much worse deal for solar garden subscribers, including allowing the utility to impose a «reasonable charge» to cover ill - defined costs.

re negative carbon prices: SCC calculations allow for a level at which (marginal) abatement costs exceed projected damages so the SCC is negative.

More broadly, as long as the tax is beneath the SCC, alternative uses of the revenue can a) achieve cost - effective emission reductions beyond what the tax achieves on its own, and / or b) loosen political constraints, allowing the carbon price to rise.

This necessarily results in an SCC determination that is higher than the best science could possibly allow.

The purpose of the «social cost of carbon» (SCC) estimates presented here is to allow agencies to incorporate the social benefits of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions into cost - benefit analyses of regulatory actions that impact cumulative global emissions.

The SCC had hinted that if Article 53 of the Charter allowed a higher level of protection, there would be no need for a doctrinal shift.

NOTE: This Court of Appeal Decision was over turned by the Supreme Court of Canada 2017 SCC 61 and the claim was allowed

The SCC decision allows two B.C. First Nations to file for damages against mining giant Rio Tinto.

In Imperial Oil v. Jacques, 2014 SCC 66 the court upheld the ruling of a trial judge that allowed the plaintiffs in a class action to access government surveillance materials during civil discovery proceedings.

This includes allowing contingencies for the possibility that the future may differ from what the evidence at trial indicates: Krangle (Guardian ad litem of) v. Brisco, 2002 SCC 9, at para. 21.

The use of headings, allows for quick - scanning so if you're litigating / advising / managing a particular file (s), you can quickly tell what issues the SCC is dealing with of relevance to your case.

Stacey says one of the most remarkable aspects of the SCC clerkship process was the fact each judge was able to select their own clerks, allowing each judge to look at applicants more personally and «take into account prior experience, working style, diversity, language ability, etc.» when selecting clerks for their chambers.

The public trust doctrine has not been widely discussed in Canadian case law with the only significant mention being by the Supreme Court of Canada in British Columbia v. Canadian Forest Products Ltd., 2004 SCC 38 at para. 74 where Binnie J. acknowledged that «The notion that there are public rights in the environment that reside in the Crown has deep roots in the common law» (however, the majority decision ultimately took a conservative approach to not allow the Crown to succeed in a general claim for damages for «environmental loss» [caused by a negligently undetected controlled burn of slashing and other waste by a logging company] in the absence of a statutory scheme permitting such a claim).

First, the SCC held that the Supreme Court Act, RSC 1985, c S - 26, s 6 could not be read so as to allow the appointment of someone who was at any time an advocate in the Quebec Bar for 10 years.

As the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) does not provide reasons for its decisions on who is allowed to intervene in a case, it is impossible for parties to know exactly what the... Read more

Apotex had moved to re-open validity to allow the Court to adjudicate the issue of «overpromising» in light of the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2017 SCC 36, which related to the same patent.

In my last post on Double Aspect, I wrote about the religious freedom issues addressed in the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ktunaxa Nation v British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations), 2017 SCC 54, which concerned the constitutionality of a ministerial decision to allow development on land considered sacred by an Aboriginal nation.

The SCC decided the provincial legislation and the federal BIA clearly conflict — and can't operate concurrently: one provides for the release of all claims provable in bankruptcy, while the other disregards this release and allows for the use of a debt enforcement mechanism to exclude a discharge in bankruptcy.

Another example may be found in the recent case of Brent Bish on behalf of Ian Stewart v Elk Valley Coal Corporation, Cardinal River Operations, SCC Case No 36636, leave to appeal granted from the judgment in Stewart v Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2015 ABCA 225 (CanLII), where Jennifer Koshan points to the missing voices of five human rights commissions (who had applied to intervene jointly), which, had they been allowed to intervene, could have contributed meaningfully by assisting the court in a case where the test for discrimination was a live issue.

The SCC recognized the benefits to allowing parties to reach a «mutually acceptable resolution to their dispute», «without prolonging the personal and public expense and time involved in litigation».9 The SCC further cited the benefits of settlement which were enunciated in Sparling v. Southam Inc., as follows:

A majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) allowed the IPC's appeal (per Justices McLachlin CJ, LeBel, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein), reinstating the adjudicator's order and remitting the matter to the chambers judge to consider the issues that were not dealt with in the original judicial review.

R. v. Koczab, 2014 SCC 9 (35411) The Chief Justice: «The appeal is allowed for the reasons of Monnin J.A., dissenting in the Court of Appeal.»

Canadian Artists» Representation v. National Gallery, 2014 SCC 42 (35353) Chief Justice: «The appeal is allowed, with reasons to follow.»

Kazemi Estate v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 2014 SCC 62 (35034) The current state of the law in Canada does not allow the appellants to sue the respondents for damages in a Canadian court.

In Bedford and Carter v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, [2015] 1 SCR 331, which dealt with the constitutionality of the provisions of the Criminal Code relative to prostitution and assisted suicide respectively, the evidence that was held to allow lower courts to revisit Supreme Court precedent came mostly from the social sciences.

The SCC's decision did not allow for much flexibility and went against one of the usual practices of appellate courts — to give deference to the Copyright Board in findings of fact (fairness in claims of fair dealings is one such finding of fact).

The webcast of the hearing in Canada (Attorney General) v. Kane, 2012 SCC 64, was barely up on the Supreme Court's website before the appeal was allowed.

Your conclusion is that the SCC will decide the appellate judge made errors sufficient to allow the SCC to allow the appeal.

In a 5 - 2 decision written by Justice Rosalie Abella, the SCC found that the immigration officer applied the guidelines so rigidly as to misconstrue them, ignoring the purpose of the provisions granting ministerial discretion in the first place — namely, to allow for compassion where appropriate.

According to the Virginia Highway Corporation Act, three conditions must be met in order for the SCC to allow TRIP II to raise the Greenway toll including: 1) It must be reasonable to the user in relation to the benefit obtained; 2) It should not discourage the use of the roadway by the public and; 3) It should provide the operator with a reasonable rate of return.