Sentences with phrase «scc said»

To that end, the SCC said that trial judges must consider alternative (even speculative) explanations that might account for the hearsay statement, before letting it in (Bradshaw, para 80).

The seminal reason why the BCCA view is the wrong interpretation of Snell is because the SCC said so in, in so many words, in 2003 in K.L.B. v. British Columbia, 2003 SCC 51, [2003] 2 SCR 403.

But looking at what the SCC said in its earlier decision, if I was in their shoes, I would have thought the chances of success to be slim.

what we also know is that the logic of what the SCC said in Fairchild requires that Resurfice mc apply to the one tortfeasor situation, not the least because the blood donor in Walker Estate wasn't necessarily negligent.

Professor Lisa Austin was there, and highlighted a comment made by the SCC in R. v. Mills in which the a majority of the SCC said, «Privacy is not an all or nothing right.»

The SCC said no:

I suppose if the «appeal» went only to whether there would be summary judgment rather than a trial based on the law as found by the court, then the whole SCC said «no summary judgment».

Even in the case of the Succoth hut on the condominium's balcony, where the SCC said that religious belief had only to be sincere to qualify for Charter protection (Linus van Pelt in Peanuts expressed that decades ago: it doesn't matter what you believe, as long as you're sincere), the religious person got to set up his hut contrary to the condo's by - laws because the court held it was no big deal for the condo.

In its decision, the SCC said «small - scale election activities» would not fall under the act's definition of sponsorship, and that those involved in sponsorship of election advertising under $ 500 would need to register.

The SCC says it considered factors such as prejudice to the accused, institutional delay, time for disclosure, and other inherent factors that can reasonably contribute to delay.

Anybody want to speculate about what'll happen, especially if the SCC says, in effect, «ahem, folks, you know we didn't actually overrule Athey material contribution.

However, SCC says they don't deal with the question of «how to make someone 100 % owner of the company.»

And, what the SCC says the law was is what we, when we're practicing law, have to take as the received truth as to what the law was, even if we know better and the SCC ought to have to known better to.

You're doing this over the next few months before the SCC says anything more on point, so the last 3 cases you that might help you decide what the current panel will do, bearing in mind we have new judges are Clements, Ediger and Benhaim.

It probably isn't what the SCC says the law is, at least if we take Athey's statements at face value: even a minor role is sufficient so long as it is a necesary role (Athey, para. 41.2).

Not exact matches

Taylor, the small church enabler at Small Church Connexion (SCC), a Baptist initiative to assist small churches, says: «In 2004, I went to talk to a big church about SCC.

«We believe that the complimentary roles of the bitter and sweet taste receptors in these SCCs keeps upper airway colonizing bacteria at optimal levels during periods of relative health,» Cohen says.

«No matter whether human being, mouse, whale or bacterium, nature does not constantly invent proteins for various living organisms anew, but varies them by evolutionary mutation and selection,» Alexander Schug of the Steinbuch Centre for Computing (SCC) says.

Members of President - elect Donald Trump's transition team have criticized the use of the SCC — saying it has been used to justify costly regulation — and have vowed to scrutinize how it is calculated.

SCC chief executive, Christina Siaw, said: «We are pleased to be able to launch this shuttle bus service so that ferry passengers can enjoy a fuss - free and seamless travel experience between Batam, Bintan and Changi Airport.

SCC chief executive Christina Siaw said: «We are deeply honoured to receive such a prestigious award for the third straight year.

The SCC commissioners will have the final say, however.

More precisely, the dispersion of results (measured say by the standard deviation) relative to the mean is larger for emissions, output, damages, and the SCC than for concentrations or temperature.

[So you could say that the SCC is basically what the authors determining / publishing it want it to be.]

In the past, when I've raised this international trade aspect here at CE (a paradigm used by leading World Economists), there has been no objective comments to this «big picture view» of the SCC — say, to discuss why China is implementing a carbon tax?

Peter, saying SCC is rubbish is a crucial step toward banning its use in federal cost benefit analysis, which is my preferred policy outcome.

Well, Peter, that's pretty much what I was saying earlier in this thread: although there may be some theoretical value in debating the merits or demerits of the SCC, there's no practical point when most of the world has no serious interest in reducing emissions and therefore is not going to make use of it.

And isn't it that reality that makes a nonsense of the US government's SCC estimates (the topic of David Wojick's article)-- whatever those «who know much more» than you may say?

Saying SCC is now entrenched is just as futile as saying the science is seSaying SCC is now entrenched is just as futile as saying the science is sesaying the science is settled.

That means that a SCC model that shows some harms in say, Bangladesh, can be used to impose a US tax, even if it shows some benefit in the US.

Even if one were to agree with all of the models used to create a SCC number, and all of the parameters inputted to said models, there is still the 300 year timeline required to produce a number that calls for action.

So David says that SCC is absurd, but also says that policies to address climate change are «Draconian.»

Note for Alarmists: there is no point saying the IAMs say so or SCC so estimated $ 37 / t CO2 or whatever unless you can show the empirical evidence to calibrate the damage functions used in the IAMs or other models.

Perhaps in response to the fact that they can't argue against what we have been saying, the Administration has finally capitulated and is opening up their determination of the social cost of carbon (SCC) for public comment.

That is to say, they fall short of the social cost of carbon (SCC), as estimated by economists.

The IPCC's Fourth Assessment, chapter three, says, «Due to considerable uncertainties and difficulties in quantifying non-market damages, it is difficult to estimate SCC [social cost of carbon] with confidence.

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) decision arrives amid criticism from industry groups and Republicans who say the Obama administration's May 2013 upward revision of the SCC earlier lacked public input.

As I have said before, if one set of people get the benefits of increasing CO2 and another set get the costs, it makes absolutely no sense to say these offset each other in the SCC unless you have a way to transfer money from the gainers to the losers.

Pal says if the SCC ruling had been in favour of the association, it could create problems tracking advertising through social media sites during Canadian campaigns.

Lead Paralegal Instructor Selina Dougherty said, «Not only is this a great honor, but this designation means that our students can continue on here at SCC, and we can continue to graduate the finest paralegals in the profession.»

unless this case goes to SCC it will be of no value to the rest of canada - a newsreel media story on Ivan Henrysaid «the judge intentionally labelled Henry vexatious so he would not have a chance to appeal to SCC - the SCC automatically reject the vexatious» i am trying to figure out how this is done - in my case the ns attorney general defence lawyer had been on my case for years then one week before i sent in my SCC appeal books she wrote me and said she had moved to the SCC office where my books would be ariving!!!!!!! i reported this to the SCC but my complaint was ignored - so did the NSAG lawyer get ahold of my books and change them so SCC judges never seen my arguements - thats how bad they do nt want SLR's to use the courts!!!!!!

For the Supreme Court of Canada, the SCC Rules say nothing regarding citation in the section about books of authorities.

Joanna Birenbaum, director of litigation for the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund, an intervener in the case, says if the SCC orders N.S. to remove her niqab, it could have far - reaching implications for sexual assault victims.

The majority decision, supported by four of the seven judges who heard the case at the SCC, said lower courts must consider, among other things, the harm that could come if Muslim women who wear the niqab feel discouraged from reporting offenses.

«Quebec (Attorney General) v A — Much Ado About Saying «I do»» - Quebec (Attorney General) v. A, 2013 SCC 5, [2013] 1 SCR 61, by Stephanie Voudouris, The Court

The Supreme Court of Canada says that a core aspect of a lawyer's duty of loyalty is the «duty of commitment to the client's cause (sometimes referred to as «zealous representation»)» (R v Neil 2002 SCC 70 at para. 19).

However, he says in both Jones and Marakah the SCC «really held that the expectation of privacy — or the privacy interests in text messages — is not in the phone or the account where they're found, but in the content of the message itself, the information contained in the text message.»

The SCC decision in AstraZeneca «reaffirms that Canada has a strong patent system, and as a jurisdiction it can be attractive in terms of IP rights: both law and remedies,» says Steven Garland, an intellectual property litigator and a patent and trademark agent with Smart & Biggar / Fetherstonhaugh in Ottawa.

Last Fall the SCC sent a similar message in the Vu case saying that a general search warrant for a home was not sufficient to search a computer found there.

Because the SCC upheld the Court of Appeal decision and said these communities can bring forward a damages claim, Bains says it will be interesting to see if they go ahead and pursue the claim against Rio Tinto or, if the parties will negotiate an out - of - court settlement.