So even though it is officially only 20 percent of the G -
SIB score, is size, in fact, the dominant component in determining systemic importance?
Figure 2 plots the G -
SIB score against exposures, the measure of size used in the calculation.
So determining systemic risk may be largely a matter of size, at least to the extent that G -
SIB scores are an accurate measure, but that doesn't mean it's safe to ignore the other indicators.
While the dots do not line up exactly on a straight line, it is clear that larger banks also tend to have higher G -
SIB scores.
Not exact matches
My
sibs and I also did some serious damage with the after Christmas sales... and
scored some pretty good deals at Loft.